- Zope - Zope lists

SOME ITEMS THAT YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN OR BE ABLE TO ADVISE ME ON
by kriss rolo 24 Jan '02

24 Jan '02

These are the items that iam interested in selling.. Could you help me with some details on the goods, history, origin etc. are these worth anything and if so who would i contact with regards to selling them? and the best way to sell them ie auction etc APOLOGISE IF YOU HAVE ALREADY RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL JPEGS ARE AVAILABLE AT YOUR REQUEST MANY THANX kriss rolo tel: 0044 182760393 office (uk) 0044 1216864211 home (uk) 0044 7814294018 mobile (uk) return e-mail address krissrolo(a)aol.com UK ONLY VEHICLE REGISTRATION NUMBER N64 CON NINTENDO 64 CONSOLE item 1 hand carved round table with metal chain link in the middle item 2 magnum laurent perrier vintage 1988 champagne item 3 miniture football on stand from euro96 signed by pele and bobby charlton item 4 is a bit more interesting. its a protana minifon attache, as u will see ive enclosed notes from a web site regarding this and you will see back in the 50's it cost $340.00 so i could imagine this to be worth a bit. it also has an original tape inside i do not know what is on this tape, but judging by who made it and the cost of the machine, the tape could have some important information on it. heres the note..... The Minifon, developed in the early 1950s by Monske GMBH of Hanover(or by Protona GMBH- I'm not certain), was an ultra-miniaturized, battery operated magnetic recording device. It could not (initially at least) record the full range of sounds and was thus limited to voice recording, but it did offer easy portability in a very small package. The idea of offering a pocket dictating machine was novel, since dictation had previously been done in the office. However, it was thought that people like salesmen could take the machine "on the road" with them. Once on the market, the Minifon's promoters discovered that many people took advantage of the recorder's small size to make secret recordings to be used as evidence, as in court.<BR> <BR> The "legitimate" use of the Minifon, as a dictating machine, was somewhat problematical. Recordings made on regular dictating equipment were usually letters, and thus were normally sent almost immediately to a typist. The Minifon offered no obvious advantages over standard dictation equipment for office use, but its developers hoped to cultivate new uses for dictation equipment, such as stock taking in warehouses, or the use of the machine as a substitute for note-taking by reporters, insurance adjusters, salesmen, and others. In its original form, the Minifon was a wire recorder, using a type of wire medium developed by the Armour Research Foundation of Chicago and employed in many similar devices since the late 1940s. The machine at its introduction in 1952 had a recording time of one hour, which was remarkably long, and weighed only about 3 pounds at a time when a typical office dictating machine weighed upwards of 10 pounds. It accomplished this small size and light weight in part through the use of miniature tubes and clever mechanical design. The basic machine cost $289.50-- a price that sounds high today but was very much in line with competing office dictating machines. The parent company attempted to set up distribution, sales and service networks in the United States. It established a business office called the Minifon Export Corp in New York, and an existing company, Harvey Radio in New York City became the main distributor. Although smaller tape recorders appeared at about the same time, the main competition in the voice recording field was from an American company, Mohawk, which made a small, battery-operated cartridge tape recorder called the Migetape. Both products sold less than 10,000 units per year in the U.S.<BR> After a few years, the Minifon was modified to use transistors and magnetic tape, further lowering its weight and cost. By 1962 the basic machine weighed in at only 1.5 pounds. Competition by this time had helped bring the cost down to $249.50. The Minifon after about 1962 was distributed by the international conglomerate ITT through its subsidiary in the U.S., Federal Electric Corp. A little later, distribution was taken over by the ITT Distributor Products Division in Lodi, New Jersey. (I don't know whether these were the same company with different names) By the time ITT became associated with this product, it had taken on the name of Minifon "Attache," and a new line of models and options appeared. These included a hi-fi model, the 978H, which sold for $330.50.Usinga two-track, 1/4 inch tape cartridge operating at 1 7/8 inches per second, the machine claimed a frequency response of up to 12,000 Hz, plus or minus 3db. The coming of magnetic tape did not completely displace wire. The Model 240 series of recorders introduced in the early 1960s were probably the last wire recorders in regular production. The 240L, at a price of $269.50 used a special long-playing wire cartridge that held 4 hours of wire. Otherwise it looked like both the tape model and the 240S, which used a 2-hour wire cartridge and sold for $249.50. Another innovation was the introduction of more conventional recorders. After years of offering only "half" of a complete dictation system, Minifon finally developed a restyled, non-portable "office" machine, mainly for use by a transcriber, with pedal controls. By the mid-1960s, Minifon was trying to market its machines as multi-purpose devices suitable for nearly any recording need. In addition to the hi-fi and long-playing machines, the company offered an astounding variety of optional equipment such as foot controls, microphones, external amplifiers and loudspeakers, headsets, external power supplies, telephone recording attachments, conference recording adapters. One of the most interesting options were the miniature microphones intended to allow users to make "spy" recordings. In addition to a small tie-clip microphone, the Minifon could be equipped with a microphone disguised as a wrist- watch.

1 0

Re: [Zope-Annce] GraphMethod 0.3.0 released
by Joachim Schmitz 24 Jan '02

24 Jan '02

Hi Stephan, when I startup my Zope-2.4.3 after installing GraphMethod, I get a broken Product with: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/ZopePark/ZopeVersions/Zope-2.4.3/lib/python/OFS/Application.py" , line 563, in import_product product=__import__(pname, global_dict, global_dict, silly) File "/usr/local/ZopePark/tozo2.aixtraware.de/ZInstanceHome/Products/GraphMethod /__init__.py", line 8, in ? import GraphMethod, Plugins File "/usr/local/ZopePark/tozo2.aixtraware.de/ZInstanceHome/Products/GraphMethod /GraphMethod.py", line 17, in ? from Products.GraphMethod.Plugins.PluginRegistry import PluginRegistry File "/usr/local/ZopePark/tozo2.aixtraware.de/ZInstanceHome/Products/GraphMethod /Plugins/__init__.py", line 1, in ? from PluginRegistry import PluginRegistry ImportError: No module named PluginRegistry Mit freundlichen Grüßen Joachim Schmitz -------------------------------------------------------------------- AixtraWare Ingenieurbüro für Internetanwendungen Hüsgenstr. 33a, D-52457 Aldenhoven Telefon: +49-2464-8851, FAX: +49-2464-905163 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Key fingerprint = DA10 CC82 62F8 1DBB 39A1 1EDC 725B 3317 A8D7 C3A6 Keyserver: http://germany.keyserver.net/en/

1 0

Accessing list elements
by Smith, Neil 24 Jan '02

24 Jan '02

Is there a way of accessing a specific element from a list within a dtml method. I have tried multiple formats of syntax that I thought might work, but I can't find the right one. I have got something working by using a dtml-in with a start and end set to the same value, but surely there is a better way. ********************************************************************** The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and intended only for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this e-mail in error and you must not copy, disseminate, distribute, use or take any action as a result of the information contained in it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify postmaster(a)npower.com (UK 01384 275454) and delete it immediately from your system. Neither Npower nor any of the other companies in the Innogy group from whom this e-mail originates accept any responsibility for losses or damage as a result of any viruses and it is your responsibility to check attachments (if any) for viruses. Npower Limited Registered office: Windmill Hill Business Park, Whitehill Way, Swindon SN5 6PB. Registered in England and Wales: number 3653277 This e-mail may be sent on behalf of a member of the Innogy plc group of companies. **********************************************************************

2 1

Doing Date Based Publishing of documents
by Sidnei da Silva 24 Jan '02

24 Jan '02

Hello, Again I`m posting, cause no one seems to have read my previous email. Im trying to do, as the subject says, date based publishing. That is, i have a property that says that a document is to be public just after some date, and im having problem on doing the check. What im trying to do is to remove the view permission from anonymous user if date its outside range. Im doing this on the __before_publishing_traverse__ and i tried too the __bobo_traverse__. Apparently, the view permission works fine, but when i remove the Access contents information permission, it keeps showing on my menu, even if i just show it if the Access contents information is valid por the current user. The strange thing, is that if i click on the security tab, logged as admin, suddenly it disappears from the menu, like if the changes were committed only when i click the security tab. So, HELP! PLEASE! -- Sidnei da Silva X3ng Web Technology sidnei(a)x3ng.com.br

2 1

Re: [Zope] Difference between dtml-let & dtml-in
by Jean Lagarde 24 Jan '02

24 Jan '02

I wouldn't call me a Zope expert yet, but I'm pretty sure that I know what is going on. In your dtml-let, sql is not set to the RESULT of calling the zsqlmethod, but to a REFERENCE to the method (and Python does not complain about that). The method is subsequently called in your dtml-in tag (you don't need the brackets because you called it with the variable syntax; if you use the expression syntax instead (sql in double quotes), you should get the same error). In the second case, collapsed to the dtml-in, you are using the expression syntax, so you need the brackets. Cheers, Jean On 23 Jan 02, Gabriel Genellina wrote: > Hi > > This piece of code works fine: > > <dtml-let sql="restrictedTraverse(PathToSqlMethod)"> > <dtml-in sql> > <dtml-var AnyFieldName>, > </dtml-in> > </dtml-let> > > where PathToSqlMethod is a path to any SQLMethod, and AnyFieldName is a > column name in that SQLMethod. > > Then, I didnt like the dtml-let, so I collapsed both lines, and wrote: > > <dtml-in "restrictedTraverse(PathToSqlMethod)"> > <dtml-var AnyFieldName>, > </dtml-in> > > and I got a KeyError in __getitem__, Error Value: 0 (zero). > After several attempts I got the right way of doing it: > > <dtml-in "restrictedTraverse(PathToSqlMethod)()"> > <dtml-var AnyFieldName>, > </dtml-in> > > So I need to call the SQLMethod explicitly, and then it returns a > sequence > that <dtml-in> can handle (at least, this is what I guess.) > > But now, I don't understand why the ()'s arent needed using > <dtml-let>, and > then, why are them really necessary using <dtml-in "">. > I would expect both tags to behave similarly. > Perhaps someone can explain me the difference. > > > Gabriel Genellina > Softlab SRL

1 0

Re: [Zope] cannot import library driving me mad!
by Fabiano Weimar dos Santos 24 Jan '02

24 Jan '02

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Greg, in order to a best system administration, you have to do a choice. Or you install tarballs or rpm packages. Do no mix or ... you could be have some problems of compatibility. Don't mix versions too. Thus, to install tarballs when you already have rpms instaled, unistall the packages. # rpm -e mysql-devel # rpm -e mysql-client and, after that, install the tarballs by your "hands". If you don't like to compile code, you could upgrade the version of the instaled packages. # rpm -Uvh mysql-devel*.rpm # rpm -Uvh mysql-client*.rpm If you use tarballs, you have only to reinstall from the sources, but, with mysql, you need to take care about the database data (in doubt, make a backup :-). PS: Don't worry madman. Any one that uses Zope and Python is a litle crazy (it's includes myself). - -- Fabiano Weimar dos Santos X3ng Web Technology Consultoria e Desenvolvimento Celular: 54 9114-7230 ICQ: 40187432 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8UANZTqbDpNXhEbERAof8AJ9YLccajqIAQUBxAGN/i2+3mCHrHQCeKoOt wimLX6n4zwKdGvzwcMGfCuA= =E0J6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Why does upload times differ when using FTP or the management interface?
by Ausum 24 Jan '02

24 Jan '02

These are times of single file uploads, from the local file system: A tiff file of 4.7 MB: Using the management interface: 2'10" Using FTP: 25 seconds A jpeg of 478Kb: MI: 14 seconds FTP: 3 1/2 seconds An mp3 of 3.6MB: MI: 1'40" FTP: 17 seconds Why is this happening? Times were measured from pushing the required button until the page response (in the case of the MI), and until the "transfer complete" message in FTP. The test box was a Pentium 200 running Windows 2000, Zope 2.5b4, IE 5.5, and WS_FTP95. Moreover, when using Netscape 4.75 the times were even longer, unless playing around with the browser window (meaning resizing it several times during the upload) wich "fasten" the upload by apparently forcing the page to respond. (It looks more like a Netscape's bug this sort of response laziness) . Nonetheless FTP was still faster, and doing the same trick in IE didn't change the times above. Is it known that FTP is faster even for single uploads? If so, why does it have to be that way? Thanks in advance, Ausum p.s. As a funny coincidence, the mp3 file had this filename: "Marvin Gaye - What's Going On.mp3" :)

2 1

RE: [Zope] Temp files and disk space issues
by sean.upton＠uniontrib.com 24 Jan '02

24 Jan '02

Sounds like subtransactions are being committed or some other use of tempfile. Install "lsof" on your server to view a table of your file descriptors, and you should be able to see the open files, which you can grep through to find what you want (i.e. grep for Zope's pid). Sean -----Original Message----- From: Chris Muldrow [mailto:cmuldrow@fredericksburg.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:43 AM To: zope(a)zope.org Subject: [Zope] Temp files and disk space issues What are the implications if tempfile.py creates a temporary file and then runs out of space before it's done? Does it create a named file that we'd be able to watch throughout certain operations? Basically, we're noticing our var directory (which is a partition on our server) bloat and then shrink, and we suspect it's some sort of temp file that's being created. It appears to be filling up entirely at times. - Chris cmuldrow(a)fredericksburg.com _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope(a)zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

2 1

Upgrading from Zope 2.4.1 to Zope 2.4.3 on Windows
by John_Knutson＠candle.com 24 Jan '02

24 Jan '02

Hi, I'm using zope 2.4.1 for an intranet site and wish to upgrade to 2.4.3 so that I can try out the CMF. I downloaded the binary upgrade file called Zope-2.4.x-to-2.4.3-win32-x86.gz . When I unpack this using Winzip, all I get is a single file called Zope-2.4.x-to-2.4.3-win32-x86. I place this file in the root directory but Control Panel still shows the release as 2.4.1. I think that the winzip operation should give me more than the single file. What is going wrong? Cheers, John John Knutson Business Development Manager Candle Service Ltd Telephone: +44-1276-414836 Mobile: +44-7770-816157 Home office: +44-1962-844719

1 0

how to send HTML and attachment mail?
by Water Leung 24 Jan '02

24 Jan '02

<dtml-sendmail mailhost=MailHost> To: nobody(a)nowhere.com From: Zope Server Subject: Requested Report <dtml-if "emailtype=='1'"> <dtml-mime type=text/plain encode=7bit> Attached is the document you requested. <dtml-boundary name=report.htm type=text/html disposition=attachment encode=7bit><dtml-var "_[reportid]"> </dtml-mime> </dtml-if> </dtml-sendmail> _________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SMS Messenger 手機電腦互動新趨勢 Instant messaging between PC and mobile http://hk.mobile.yahoo.com/sms_msgr.html

1 0