May 1999 - Zope - Zope lists

RE: [Zope] serve.py uses old 0.9.4 license
by Alexander Staubo 06 May '99

06 May '99

That would be http://www.wincvs.org/. Alexander Staubo http://www.mop.no/~alex/ mailto:redhand@mop.no >-----Original Message----- >From: zope-admin(a)zope.org [mailto:zope-admin@zope.org]On Behalf Of >Martijn Pieters >Sent: 6. mai 1999 16:12 >To: M.Faassen(a)vet.uu.nl >Cc: M.Faassen(a)vet.uu.nl; zope(a)zope.org >Subject: Re: [Zope] serve.py uses old 0.9.4 license > > >At 15:51 06/05/99 , Martijn Faassen wrote: >>Yeah, but due to the non linuxness of this PC here I haven't fiddled a >>lot with CVS - (weak excuse) it's just too much of a hassle. > >Try WinCVS: http://www.wincvs.com/ > >Works great. Be prepared to have to try and build your own >Windows version >though... > >-- >Martijn Pieters, Web Developer >| Antraciet http://www.antraciet.nl >| Tel: +31-35-6254545 Fax: +31-35-6254555 >| mailto:mj@antraciet.nl http://www.antraciet.nl/~mj >| PGP: >http://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8A32149 >------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Zope maillist - Zope(a)zope.org >http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope > >(For developer-specific issues, use the companion list, >zope-dev(a)zope.org - http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) >

1 0

MySQL and Zope 1.11
by Philip Aylesworth 06 May '99

06 May '99

I noticed on zope.org that there is a new MySQL database connector for Zope 1.11. The one I can find is dated Jan 11, 1999. Anybody know where it is? Is it required for Zope 1.11? Can the Data.bbb be moved directly into 1.11? If so, how do I update exixting MySQLDB connections? Thanks, Phil A

2 1

Adding a new data source to Zope
by Jody Winston 06 May '99

06 May '99

I have a data store that isn't SQL or pickles but a home grown object store. I'd like to be able to have Zope read the objects from the object store. What is the API that I need to use to do this? (Or put another way, what files should I read?) Jody Winston

1 0

RE: [Zope] Pb with lot of files in publication
by Rob Page 06 May '99

06 May '99

> We use zope 1.10.2 (under linux Red hat 5.2 with Apache 1.3.3) and we > publish html pages with communicator (composer v4.03 or 4.5 under > windows 98). > > When publishing a number of GIF files greather than 100 (for example > 121) the publication stop on a file and we have the message > "Ce document > ne contient aucune données" (document without any data). But > this file > is not empty ! And if we publish the 21 last files, it is OK. > > Is there a limit in publishing ? > > Please help... Have you been able to do this with a server other than Zope? --Rob

1 0

RE: [Zope] Pb with publication
by Rob Page 06 May '99

06 May '99

> We use zope 1.10.2 (under linux Red hat 5.2 with Apache 1.3.3) and we > publish html pages with communicator (composer v4.03 or 4.5 under > windows 98). > > When publishing pages which names already exists in the Zope > hierarchy, > this documents can not be see in the hierarchy browser. In fact these > pages overwrite those which have the same name higher in the > hierarchy > whithout any warning message. > > Any idea ? <out-on-a-limb> I think it's a known issue with Composer that you can't edit sites/pages with objects in subdirectories. I _think_ it's rather intent on flattening your structure when it PUTs to the server... </out-on-a-limb> --Rob

1 0

RE: [Zope] Could we migrate Zope email to a news group?
by Ken Manheimer 06 May '99

06 May '99

On thursday, a dragon wrote: > Martijn Pieters wrote: > > > I think I could live with a NNTP solution, provided it is a _three_-way > > solution: mail/news/web. I have build such systems, based upon Perl, > > majordomo, Netscape News Server and MHonArc > > (http://www.oac.uci.edu/indiv/ehood/mhonarc.html) Sorry about the Perl, I > > am a multi-linguist. > > Actually, there already is such a thing, and Digicool is alredy > using it! The MailMan list software has web archiving and a newsgroup > gateway build in! Yes - implementing the gateway is not the issue. (Though i haven't messed much with the mailman mail/news gateway, and it sounds from barry warsaw's reports that there's a bit of finagling to be done - it is quite doable.) The issue is whether or not to do it, and when. My view is that it's probably a good idea. And we at dc won't be able to do anything about it for another few weeks. Like i say, i'm leaning towards likeing a coupled mailing list/newsgroup We'd be opening the audience beyond the folks that have enough interest in zope to go out of their way to subscribe to the maling list, which is a good and a bad thing. We'd reach appropriate folks we otherwise might not, and we'd also reach inappropriate folks we otherwise might not. Along these lines, ty sarna wrote: > In order to be archived on Dejanews, I believe it would have to be > distributed along with the rest of USENET. The problem with this is that > it opens the forum up to spamming, off-topic threads, and all sorts of > other junk. If there was a comp.infosystems.zope, or what have you, the > volume would probably rise tenfold overnight, with most of it being > completely irrelevant. My only recent experience with usenet news is comp.lang.python - and though i can't regularly keep up with it, i don't find much to be off topic. (The occasional flame fests are obnoxious, but not completely off topic...-) My inclination is to gateway the zope(a)zope.org list, leaving zope-dev(a)zope.org for the hardcore folk. Someone wrote: |> As an ex-newsmaster, the idea of relying entirely |> upon USENET scares the willies out of me. This is one reason to use a gateway, so people have a choice. We'd be keeping both the current mailing lists as mailing lists - just possibly extending the zope(a)zope.org to also be accessible as a newsgroup. I haven't looked at the news hierarchies recently, so i'm not sure offhand where zope would best fit. comp.infosystems? Suggestions? In any case, in the short term we at dc (i keep wanting to say "digicool"-) are locked into development for the linux expo, so we won't be able to do anything until a bit after that happens (may 19-21).

1 0

RE: [Zope] How to know which user is seeing a page?
by Michel Pelletier 06 May '99

06 May '99

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jose G. Dinuncio F. [mailto:jdinunci@uc.edu.ve] > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 10:10 AM > To: zope(a)zope.org > Subject: [Zope] How to know which user is seeing a page? > > > Hi, everybody. > > I've developed an external method in the private part of my zope > site to do a job, but I need a log of who called it. > My Q: is any way that I could know the name(login) of the > user that > is accessing to a zope object? >  can be passed into your method. -Michel > Thanks in advance > JD > > > _______________________________________________ > Zope maillist - Zope(a)zope.org > http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope > > (For developer-specific issues, use the companion list, > zope-dev(a)zope.org - http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) >

1 0

RE: [Zope] Some written stuff, trying again
by Shaw, Howard 06 May '99

06 May '99

Sorry guys, that was meant for ZDP. Oops. Howard Clinton Shaw III St. Thomas High School > ---------- > From: Shaw, Howard[SMTP:ShawH@sths.org] > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 8:42 AM > To: 'Zope(a)zope.org' > Subject: [Zope] Some written stuff, trying again > > Well, it failed somehow, to actually include my Zip, so let's try a > plain text file. > This is a potential rewrite of the first portion. > Howard Clinton Shaw III > St. Thomas High School >

1 0

How to know which user is seeing a page?
by Jose G. Dinuncio F. 06 May '99

06 May '99

Hi, everybody. I've developed an external method in the private part of my zope site to do a job, but I need a log of who called it. My Q: is any way that I could know the name(login) of the user that is accessing to a zope object? Thanks in advance JD

1 0

serve.py uses old 0.9.4 license
by Martijn Faassen 06 May '99

06 May '99

Hi there, No biggie, but I see that serve.py in the new Zope 1.11 prelease for win32 still uses the old 0.9.4 license (with the attribution clause) instead of 0.9.7. That's all. Regards, Martijn

2 4