- Zope - Zope lists

Zope - NT- DBF
by manini＠ies.it 25 Feb '99

25 Feb '99

Hi, I'm just starting trying out Zope. I've downloaded and installed Zope-1_9_0-win32-x86.exe I works and I've started making changes to have a grasp on the capabilty. Now I would like to add "something" to make a dynamic page with data coming from a table (say a DBF file). Which "pieces" do I need ? I've heard something about Tabula or ZTable but there aren't present in the distribution (not even in1.10). Any hint ? P.S. I can do some basic Pythoning if need arise :-) ----------------------------- Luca Manini GIS and Database Developer ArcView and Delphi Programmer mail: manini(a)ies.it ----------------------------- Informatica e Servizi via IV Novembre, 100 38014 Gardolo (Trento) Italy tel: +39 (461) 992 040 fax: +39 (461) 991 666 www: www.ies.it -----------------------------

1 0

Re: Zope performance ?
by Paul Everitt 25 Feb '99

25 Feb '99

"M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > > With all this hype about Zope being high performance, I was wondering: > how well does Zope perform in hits/second using an average setup, e.g. > Apache, P266, Linux ? > > As reference I'd suggest using a page with some dynamic HTML > generation not too far down the site's path. I've never been too good at test methodologies. There are so many things to take into account: interference of the client, interference of the network, getting enough clients involved, etc. Just for grins I logged into the zope.org site which is a PII-350, RedHat 5.1, and Apache. I ran a little Python script that requested a URL ten times in a row and measured the elapsed time. The URL was two hops into the site and is pretty dynamic (standard header/footer, sidebar menu computed from a Folder property, etc.). The elapsed time for ten requests was 1.3-1.4 seconds. This included connecting to Apache, which forked/fired up PCGI, which connected to Zope, which ran the requests and sent data back to PCGI, which read it off the domain socket and returned it to Apache, which returned it to my Python script. Just for grins I fired up a ZServer (Zope woven tightly with Medusa, no Apache). The elapsed time for ten requests dropped to 0.7 seconds! I'm just as surprised as the next guy by that. *If* it's true, it probably means that a mod_pcgi Apache module, or a switch to mod_fastcgi, is in the future. I did a test a while ago of our full-text search speed. On my laptop -- P166, 64 Mb, NT 4 -- I loaded a 24 Mb, 27,000 record copy of the Internet movie database into a Z Table (Tabula). I did a search that combined a keyword, year, and full-text searchterm (actor AND actress AND star). The search came back in under a second, formatting the first 20 of around a thousand matches. Anyway, none of these tests are rigorous. --Paul

3 2

RE: [Zope] Re: Zope performance ?
by Michel Pelletier 25 Feb '99

25 Feb '99

> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Everitt [mailto:paul@digicool.com] > > Just for grins I logged into the zope.org site which is a PII-350, > RedHat 5.1, and Apache. I ran a little Python script that requested a > URL ten times in a row and measured the elapsed time. The URL was two > hops into the site and is pretty dynamic (standard header/footer, > sidebar menu computed from a Folder property, etc.). Paul's allways living in the past. We use RedHat 5.2. -Michel > > Anyway, none of these tests are rigorous. > > --Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Zope maillist - Zope(a)zope.org > http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope >

1 0

deleting variables in DTML
by julian＠zereau.net 25 Feb '99

25 Feb '99

How would I delete variables from the DTML namespace, from within DTML? --- Julian Morrison Programmer (Zereau Ltd)

1 0

Problems requesting SQL date fields
by Alexander Schad 25 Feb '99

25 Feb '99

I have connected my zope server with a SQL-Server but when i'm requesting a date field a get an error. Can anybody tell me what might went wrong? Alex

1 0

RE: [Zope] Re: Zope performance ?
by Paul Everitt 25 Feb '99

25 Feb '99

Chris wrote: > Given a "snapshot" of the Zope site, you could run webstones > (from SGI) > against it with a reasonable subset of pages, but again, it's all > hand-waving in it's relation to reality---but that's the joy of > benchmarks, they're only useful for proving that it's fast doing THAT. Last time I looked at that benchmark (about 2 years ago), installing and using it was about 50 times harder than installing and using our server. [snip] > increases. mod_pcgi is probably the best option for glueing into > Apache, in my opinion, and probably would reduce the problems 10 fold > with authentication, etc. OK, when can we have it? :^) Of course, while it reduces the current set of problems ten fold, it might just well create the same amount of new problems. --Paul Paul Everitt Digital Creations paul(a)digicool.com 540.371.6909

2 1

hiding tracebacks, and catching exceptions
by julian＠zereau.net 25 Feb '99

25 Feb '99

The persistent-CGI version of Zope always seems to append tracebacks to error pages, and it makes for a messy-looking site. 1) is there any way of setting it so it sends these to web server logs (on stdout) and not to the HTML? 2)Is there any way of catching and handling exceptions from within DTML? --- Julian Morrison Programmer (Zereau Ltd)

1 0

RE: [Zope] [Q] About sessions and Zope
by Shaw, Howard 25 Feb '99

25 Feb '99

Everitt's suggestion is good, but I suspect that you will probably have to write an External Method to automatically create and enter the session... Go to lib/python/Products/OFSP/Session.py and browse the source for the functions and their parameters. In particular, on the Folder object you have created you need to execute .manage_addSession, then For example, if I was in the parent folder which will contain your newly created Folder, my DTML might call:  where 'folder' is obtained from a form, and PARENTS[0] is the form-response's immediate parent (i.e. the containing folder), and newSession is an External Method something like this: def newSession(parent,foldername): parent.manage_addFolder(foldername) current=getattr(parent,foldername) #now current is 'inside' the new folder current.manage_addSession('session_id','ActiveSession') current=getattr(current,'session_id') current.enter() return 'some DTML snippet' Note: This is untested code! > ---------- > From: Max Murdock[SMTP:ffelici@gol.grosseto.it] > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 1999 4:32 AM > To: zope(a)zope.org > Subject: [Zope] [Q] About sessions and Zope > > Zope is surely a great system to develop dynamic html sites, and even > a > novice like me can learn how to use it. > > My problem is that I've got to be able to make users able to manage > sessions in a transparent way: people who get in the site should open > a > session, create a folder, put there their material and leave to tehe > site > manager the task to verify what they sent and close the session. > And all this should be done seamlessly by the user, possibly with a > single > form, without having the task to "click to add session", the enter the > name, then go to the session and make ti active, create the folder and > upload there the files... > The main.dtml suggests me to present the user a form with the > "manage_addSessionForm" button to press... then he can put the session > name > and click "add". So he automatically returns to the folder view, and > that's > not exacltly what "transparent to the user" means, understand me... > So I guess I have to reprogram the routine that makes the form: > instead of > showing the folder it should automatically start the session and ask > for a > new folder to be created. > The PROBLEM: where's that routine? Where's the script that makes the > form? > Where is it going when I select the "manage_addSessionForm" action? I > ain't been able to find it, even with the "find" command, ain't got > other > ideas... > > I understand maybe this Q requires a bit of answer... if anyone wont' > take > this labour I can perfectly understand; otherwise: can someone point > me a > doc explaining all this? I've downloaded most of the docs in the Zope > site, > and I can dnload more... > > TIA! > Max Murdock > > _______________________________________________ > Zope maillist - Zope(a)zope.org > http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope >

1 0

RE: [Zope] [Q] About sessions and Zope
by Paul Everitt 25 Feb '99

25 Feb '99

Max wrote: > My problem is that I've got to be able to make users able to manage > sessions in a transparent way: people who get in the site > should open a > session, create a folder, put there their material and leave > to tehe site > manager the task to verify what they sent and close the session. For what it's worth, we're working on weaving the capability deeply into Zope. That is, having roles of users whose changes must be reviewed before they are live or go into the site-wide catalog/index. We've done several rough versions of this for customers and for demos. Making it a general facility takes some thinking though. Also, you have to give the reviewers a productive interface for looking at a large amount of data quite quickly. I'm not completely convinced that we can come up with a single, general-purpose, works-with-all-objects facility for reviewing. If we can, though, it will pretty radically change website development, as it will apply to all content (calendar entries, HTML files, package uploads, used car listings, etc.) For now, your approach was a pretty good one. Take the people to a "login" page that automatically puts them in a session and perhaps authenticates them with the cookie-authentication from UserDB. --Paul

1 0

Re: [Zope] Splitting the Zope mailling
by Phil Harris 25 Feb '99

25 Feb '99

You have a good point, I belong to another list, PHP3, where the same discussion has been raging for months. The basic feeling there is that if the list was split, the 'experts' would leave thereby the questions on the list would be answered by 'less well informed humans' :). This would then 'force' the 'mere mortals' on the original list to migrate. Thereby creating the problem all over again. The PHP3 list btw has about double the traffic of this list. Recently, the list came up with a very simple method to make the list easier to digest. All posts should have a 'topic indicator', for example, all posts about installing should be marked as [INSTALL]. All development posts marked as [DEVEL] and etc. Seems to be working a treat. my 2c See ya Phil ----- Original Message ----- From: Martijn Faassen <faassen(a)vet.uu.nl> Cc: <zope(a)zope.org> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 1999 9:19 AM Subject: Re: [Zope] Splitting the Zope mailling >Ken Manheimer wrote: >[snip] >> zope(a)zope.org zope-dev(a)zope.org >> ------------- ----------------- >> installation and operation dtml coding questions and hints >> content management using the programmer APIs >> desired user-level features new and existing architecture design >> business decisions contributed widgets >> w.r.t. open source >> public relations in general >> >> These are off the top of my head - and i'm relatively new to the >> community, so i'm quite open to suggestions about what belongs where. >> Overall question is, does the split make sense in principle? > >I'm not against this split. However, I'll end up subscribing to both >anyway, as both areas interest me. I suspect the same would happen with >most of us, as I think most of us are interested in desired user level >features and business decisions on how to proceed with Zope as well as >the coding side of things. > >I'm also a bit vague about the two 'categories' we're looking at. That >is, 'zope-dev' is fairly clear, but 'zope' is everything left over (and >it could be argued desired user-level features also belongs on >zope-dev). Perhaps this is the intent, anyway? > >It is however unlikely you can do a mailing list split that will allow >many people to unsubscribe from one or the other right now, and a split >is useful to me anyway in that there'll be more structure in my mailbox >(with the appropriate mail filters). > >Regards, > >Martijn > >_______________________________________________ >Zope maillist - Zope(a)zope.org >http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope >

2 1