- Zope - Zope lists

RE: [Zope] - Zope running with Apache
by Jeff Bauer 14 Dec '98

14 Dec '98

> I am hoping to run Zope with Apache on regular > port 80 and so I restart httpd and try > > http://mymachine/cgi-bin/Zope/manage > > I did get the authenticate box, and I got thru > and the browser runs for about 15 secs and then > I got a resource unavailable (102) fail to connect > error. Things to check: - Are you sure you have mod_rewrite compiled in your Apache? Use httpd -l to check. - What do your Apache error logs say? - What does var/pcgi.err say? - Use pcgifile.py to verify Zope.cgi settings Regards, Jeff Bauer Rubicon, Inc.

2 1

RE: [Zope] - Re: [XML-SIG] Re: [Zope] - Zope, DTML and XML
by Jeffrey Shell 14 Dec '98

14 Dec '98

> Right, but DTML code is not valid XML code. It can't be > edited in an XML > editor, stored in an XML repository, routed through XML-based > workflow, > etc. etc. But using DTML you can generate any kind of XML that you want, and get the level of effectiveness that you are stating. And then that generated XML can be routed through all the XML based workflow that you want. I've done a couple of relatively small experiments with this, once using DTML over a sequence of Tabula records to generate a good size XML file to test an XML parser. So it was an XML expression of objects in the database, but using DTML allowed me to make the XML structure that I wanted independant of the structure of the Zope database or the Tabula database or what-have-you. And even that doesn't stop you from using XSL directly in Zope. On NT *twitch* with IE5 *twitch* you could make a Zope object to call Microsofts XSL processor. Then you could have a DTML page that goes over some sort of query to return an XML document linked to the XSL style sheet. Add another document that calls the XSL processor and passes in the rendered XML document, and Walla! > > > I would suggest that Zope should use > > > XSL template syntax for DTML templates as far as is possible. > > > > It appears to me that DTML and XSL represent two very different > > approaches to solving the same or similar problems. They are > > both intended for generating text from objects. DTML generates text > > from Python objects. XSL generates text from XML objects. > > Not quite. XSL generates XML objects (technically speaking, > "nodes") from > other XML objects (other nodes). Using XML to go through XML and generate XML? :) > The big difference, of course, is that XSL's set of > expressions is quite > limited where as Python is quite flexible. That's why I > propose using the > same syntax but changing the expressions to be Python expressions. Doesn't this kill off any sort of 'XSL portability'? I can imagine a system where both Zope and, say, Access *twitch* (independantly of Zope) could generate XML documents of the same or similar DTD and have the same XSL document(s) be able to render them both on an entirely different machine. > > Given the very different natures of DTML and XSL, I don't see much > > point in making the syntaxes all that consistent. > > Do you have another XML-compliant syntax in mind or have you > decided that > XML compliance isn't critical? It's easy to write some DTML to generate XML. There's a big piece of compliance right there. Currently, there's no XML on the intake side. I think this is a _far_ more important thing to do than spend a bunch of time writing yet another XSL parser. I would rather be able to generate that phone book file as XML and be able to upload it into Zope as intelligent-ish Zope objects (into a Tabula, as Zope Folders, or who-knows-what) and write a simple  <TR> <TD></TD><TD></TD> </TR>  DTML document rather than the complex XSL involved. Then I can add the ability for people to add new phone numbers and modify their entries in this dataset and re-export it to a new updated XML file, and use some other XSL parser to generate a printable phone book, PDF, RTF, and HTML from that. The XML file can be easily done in DTML by: <?xml version="1.0"> <phonebook zip="">  <listing for=""> <fullname></fullname> <phone> </listing>  </phonebook> > > It may very well. If Zope made it easy to generate XML from > Zope (ie Python) > > objects, then people who like XSL could apply XSL > transformations to the > > resulting XSL, bypassing DTML altogether. > > Sure, but how do I specify the objects that I want to work on > from the XSL > stylesheet? You can't [*] export the database as a single XML > document, so > you must allow a syntax that allows drilling into Python > objects: Python > syntax. See above. There's a few variations that can be done. > I don't really see the difference. Either an extended XSL > replaces DTML or > an XSL-syntax DTML replaces DTML. All I'm saying is that the next > generation templating syntax should be XSL-based. XSL is _much much much_ tougher for beginners to Grok. It's very very powerful, yes, but sometimes just to do a simple tabular based report in it is waaaay too much of a headache. We discussed this a long time ago here at digicool with just an XML based replacement for DTML (XSL was just barely off the drawing board at the time of these discussions). I still emphasize that it's (a) not that hard to generate complient XML using DTML (the DTML document itself doesn't have to be XML complient, just the document as rendered), and (b) importing XML should be a bigger priority. just my <CURRENCY STYLE="cents">.02</CURRENCY>.

1 0

- List test
by Dave Goodrich 14 Dec '98

14 Dec '98

Testing to see if I can get through our Exchange server. DAve.

1 0

RE: [Zope] - Comments on SSL issues
by Jeff Bauer 14 Dec '98

14 Dec '98

> OK, one other thing that just struck me regarding SSL > issues, at least in the HTTP world... Verisign won't > issue a server sert (x.509) for just "any" server, it > has to be examined and approved (Apache finally got > this), I believe Thawte Consulting, while more freewheeling, > is also in a similar case. The reality is, you have to > have a cert from someone who is pre-registered as a root > server, or you're going to confuse your users.... sad > but true. Thawte will issue a type of certificate that can be used on any server on your domain (in addition to server certificates). Netscape accepts this type of certificate, but Microsoft Internet Explorer doesn't AFAIK. For testing purposes, we've issued our own certificates and dropped in Verisign or Thawte certificates afterwards. Regards, Jeff Bauer Rubicon, Inc.

1 0

- win95 TCP/IP
by Paul Prescod 14 Dec '98

14 Dec '98

I want to develop Zope apps on my Win95 notebook computer without being connected to the Internet. When I do so, I get the following message: File "C:\Temp\Paul's Site/lib/python1.5\BaseHTTPServer.py", line 97, in server_bind hostname, hostnames, hostaddrs = socket.gethostbyaddr(host) socket.error: host not found I think that on WinNT there was some kind of loopback adapter I could install. I can't find an equivalent for Windows 95. Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco "Sports utility vehicles are gated communities on wheels" - Anon

3 2

- Comments on SSL issues
by Christopher G. Petrilli 14 Dec '98

14 Dec '98

OK, one other thing that just struck me regarding SSL issues, at least in the HTTP world... Verisign won't issue a server sert (x.509) for just "any" server, it has to be examined and approved (Apache finally got this), I believe Thawte Consulting, while more freewheeling, is also in a similar case. The reality is, you have to have a cert from someone who is pre-registered as a root server, or you're going to confuse your users.... sad but true. Now, SSL for backend connectivity is another question :-) Chris -- | Christopher Petrilli | petrilli(a)amber.org

1 0

- Patch and some other questions
by Andy Dustman 14 Dec '98

14 Dec '98

I created a unified diff patch for ZopeHTTPServer which incorporates the improved exception handling. It is diffed against 1.9.0b2. You'll need to go into the ZopeHTTPServer directory to apply it. The other thing is: Upgrading. It looks like from the install program that if you do install over the old installation that it won't nuke your Data.bbb, which is good, but raises some other questions: 1) Generally, can you merge or otherwise transfer data from Data.bbb to another? I suspect the answer is going to be something like "loop over the keys". 2) How do you safely back up the database wrt things like locking and transactions? I also suspect a similar answer to #1... I'm not a previous Bobo user, as you can probably tell... -- Andy Dustman You should always say "spam" and "eggs" ComStar Communications Corp. instead of "foo" and "bar" (706) 549-7689 | PGP KeyID=0xC72F3F1D in Python examples. (Mark Lutz) --- ZopeHTTPServer.py.orig Fri Dec 11 16:14:29 1998 +++ ZopeHTTPServer.py Fri Dec 11 20:35:35 1998 @@ -349,24 +349,21 @@ def handle_request(self): """Handle one request, possibly blocking.""" - request, client_address = self.get_request() - if self.verify_request(request, client_address): - try: + request, client_address = None, None + try: + request, client_address = self.get_request() + if self.verify_request(request, client_address): self.process_request(request, client_address) - except SystemExit: - self.handle_error(request, client_address) - sys.exit(0) - except: - self.handle_error(request, client_address) + except SystemExit: + self.handle_error(request, client_address) + sys.exit(0) + except: + self.handle_error(request, client_address) class ThreadingHTTPServer(SocketServer.ThreadingMixIn, - BaseHTTPServer.HTTPServer): + NonThreadingHTTPServer): "A threading HTTPServer with some socket tweaks" - def server_bind(self): - self.socket.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET,socket.SO_REUSEADDR,1) - return BaseHTTPServer.HTTPServer.server_bind(self) - def try_to_become_nobody(): # from CGIHTTPServer

2 1

- Zope and SSL
by Ronald Offerman 14 Dec '98

14 Dec '98

I can run a secure Zope using pcgi and Apache-SSL. Anyone know of a way how to have ZopeHTTPServer do SSL? I don't want to allow management over insecure channels so is it possible to use a rewrite/URL refresh rule in Zope for /manage (it should redirect to https:) -- <- Ronald Offerman | ron(a)gjt-it.nl <- Root Powered Carrot Munchers Ltd. Inc. SA AG BV "Daddy, why do those people have to use Microsoft Windows?" "Don't stare, son; it's not polite." "M$ Windows NT, an accident waiting to happen" "What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator."

5 11

- Bug in sample product?
by The Dragon De Monsyne 14 Dec '98

14 Dec '98

There's either a small bug in SampleProduct, or my zope install is loopy. I had to change this: > > from Globals import HTMLFile, MessageDialog > import OFS.SimpleItem, Persistence, Acquisition, AccessControl.Role > to this: < < from Globals import HTMLFile, MessageDialog < from BoboPOS import Persistence < import OFS.SimpleItem, Acquisition, AccessControl.Role < ... in sample/Product.py to get things to work. -The Dragon De Monsyne

2 1

RE: [Zope] - 1.9b2 win32 feedback
by Brian Lloyd 14 Dec '98

14 Dec '98

> The installer ran flawlessly on NT4 Sp3 > > I chose to integrate Zope as a service w/ my Apache config. > > The doc/INSTALL.txt needs to be changed-- start.bat does not > exist, but > serve.bat does -- furthermore, serve.bat is not the right way > to starrt > Zope as a service -- instead, one needs to go to Control > Panels/Services/ > and select the name of the Zope install and click 'start'. 'serve.bat' should have been 'start.bat' -- that's my bad (forgot to update the installer). > > Running under Apache 1.3.0, /QuickStart and /manage don't > work, but I'm > not surprised -- Jeff Bauer has told me that 1.3.0 is broken in > authentication. > > A note pointing out that the authentication of Apache 1.3.0 is broken > w.r.t. Zope might save a bunch of complaints. I think we better documentation on integrating with existing servers generally - I hope to propose some things that might help this situation today. Brian Lloyd brian(a)digicool.com Software Engineer 540.371.6909 Digital Creations http://www.digicool.com

1 0