- Zope - Zope lists

Zope release numbers 1.9 to 2.1
by Robert OConnor 18 Feb '99

18 Feb '99

Paul wrote: >By the way, I'm remiss in letting people know the >schedule for 1.10. We wrapped it up yesterday, >checking in Amos' changes for officially >blessing import/export and putting it in the interface. >We are going to use 1.10 in a consulting gig this >week for which the customers are onsite here. >If it passes muster we'll make binaries early next >week and get them on the website. So your going from version 1.9 to 1.10. ***Consider going from version 1.9 to 2.1*** >From a marketing perspective and user perception. Version 1.9 seems "later" than version 1.10. and >Since 1.10 corrects a lot of bugs, we hope to >annoint it as the official stable release for quite a while. Why not go to a 2.1 release? (Skip 2.0 for the obvious reason that many people have angst about .0 releases) >This will allow us to roll out, as experimental work, >the advanced but risky stuff we're finishing up in >Zope Classes, WebDAV, and ZServer. Great -bobo connor

4 3

RE: [Zope] Apache and ZServer
by Paul Everitt 18 Feb '99

18 Feb '99

Chris wrote: > > Sounds good to me. Can anyone see any problems with doing > this? Would Zope > > care if both the Apache and ZServer parts were running side-by-side? > > Can you say lock management? :-) RIght now the POS doesn't support > multiple writers, and I don't think there's any way for ZServer NOT to > write to the database. (I mean guarantee it). So either > you'd need to > wait for Zbase3 (is this the right name? :-) which has > concurrent writer > support in theory, or figure out a way to guarantee that the > apache side > of it not to touch it. Also, you'd have caching issues, I'd think. Hate to do this to you buddy, but you're wrong. ZServer implements HTTP, FTP, *and* PCGI in the same publishing system (which also happens to be threaded now). Thus you *can* have one process listening simultaneously for connections of through Apache and FTP. --Paul

1 0

RE: [Zope] Getting started questions...
by Paul Everitt 18 Feb '99

18 Feb '99

James wrote: > Not all of the servers will have full time internet connections, so I > can't rely on accessing them via the web. I think that > copying a specific Zope 1.10's (documented) import/export facility enables this. Later we will look at an offline synchronization feature, though this is open source and someone should easily be able to grok import/export and extend it. > server's database over the previous Zope database, restarting Zope, > editing properties and then repeating the process for the next server > would be a pain. I'd much rather pull up pico and edit a static > configuration file. As mentioned later, Zope has a simple RPC mechanism -- it's called HTTP! ZClient is a package in Zope that automates this. It makes it convenient to connect to Zope and communicate with it from a scripting, non-interactive environment. As for going into a text file and making edits that affect the behavior of a number of Zope sites, this isn't very object oriented at all and is the kind of anti-Zen Zope strives against. Just my $0.02. If you want to edit a file and have it take effect in many Zopes, I don't think it should be too hard to make it do it. --Paul

1 0

WebDAV is:
by Robert OConnor 18 Feb '99

18 Feb '99

I didn't know what WebDAV was but a quick click to this link gives the details: http://www.webdav.org -bob o connor

1 0

Re: [Zope] manage_users - Error in acl_users
by Martijn Pieters 18 Feb '99

18 Feb '99

At 13:56 18/02/99 , you wrote: >Hi, > >I have a DTML page that adds users to a folder, (trying to) give them only >a specific, limited role. The code in question looks like this. I know it is >overkill, but it is more clear this way. (inId passes the folder to give >access to): > > > > > > > > Domains and Roles are both lists, so do this:       and you're home free. The hint is the source for manage_users: domains is listed as domains:tokens, and roles as roles:list. This means Zope will parse the incoming CGI data expecting a token string for domains and a list for roles, and will put a nice list for both into the REQUEST object. manage_users doesn't check wether this is actually the case, and just accepts your strings, which later on give you errors. -- M.J. Pieters, Web Developer | ATMM http://www.atmm.nl | Tel: +31-35-6254545 Fax: +31-35-6254555 | mailto:mj@atmm.nl http://www.atmm.nl/~mj | PGP: http://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8A32149 ------------------------------------------

1 0

Easy DTML question
by Stefan Franke 18 Feb '99

18 Feb '99

Is there a predefined Zope variable to be used in DTML documents that contains the parameter part of a request. Say, the requested URL is http://somewhere:9674/folder1/folder2/object?param1=values1&param2=value s2 The variable URL0 contains then http://somewhere:9674/folder1/folder2/object But is there any for the param1=values1&param2=values2 part? I guess there's a Dictionary somewhere around, but I'm right now too busy to look for it. Thanks in advance Stefan

4 3

Getting started questions...
by James A. Hillyerd 18 Feb '99

18 Feb '99

Hi, I'm new to Python (have done lots of Perl and Java on Unix though) and to Zope. I really like what I have seen of Zope, and would like to try and use it for my next project. The project has an interesting requirement, and I'm not sure how to accomplish it using the Zope Platform. I need to be able to package up the project and distribute it to multiple web servers automatically. If I did this project using cgi/perl and html I would probably just tar everything up and put it on an ftp server, which the other servers could check daily and update their code/html when a new tarball was available. How can I do something like this with Zope? I'd like to keep all my dtml/html/python code in normal text files, not in the object database. All the application data will be kept in some sort of SQL server, so if I can't eliminate the need for the object database entirely it would make my life easier. From what I've read on zope.org it sounds like I want Bobo, without Principia. In other words, I'd like to be able to walk over to a machine with my SQL database and apache installed on it and type: rpm -i zope-ver.rpm rpm -i zope-pcgi-ver.rpm tar xzf my_project.tgz Then be able to use my project from a web browser, without having to go in and configure it as a product or extention in Zope. Thanks for any help. -james [] James A. Hillyerd <jamesh(a)altavista.net> Java Developer [] HyperGlyphics: http://www.hyperglyphics.com/ [] GPG Public Key Fingerprint for 1024D/9F956CDE (Expires 2000-02-01): [] C86F B073 92DF 1E24 EF0B 0118 6061 0FEC 9F95 6CDE

3 4

Re: [Zope] Apache and ZServer
by Phil Harris 18 Feb '99

18 Feb '99

Boom, me and boat straight out of the water 8^) See ya Phil ----- Original Message ----- From: Christopher G. Petrilli <petrilli(a)amber.org> To: <zope(a)zope.org> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 1999 4:11 PM Subject: Re: [Zope] Apache and ZServer >On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 08:50:00AM -0000, Phil Harris wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm sat here thnking to my self, 'surely I could use the apache version of >> Zope for HTTP and use the ZServer for FTP'ing all content to it'. > >Great idea... but... > >> Sounds good to me. Can anyone see any problems with doing this? Would Zope >> care if both the Apache and ZServer parts were running side-by-side? > >Can you say lock management? :-) RIght now the POS doesn't support >multiple writers, and I don't think there's any way for ZServer NOT to >write to the database. (I mean guarantee it). So either you'd need to >wait for Zbase3 (is this the right name? :-) which has concurrent writer >support in theory, or figure out a way to guarantee that the apache side >of it not to touch it. Also, you'd have caching issues, I'd think. > >Chris >-- >| Christopher Petrilli >| petrilli(a)amber.org > >_______________________________________________ >Zope maillist - Zope(a)zope.org >http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope >

1 0

Apache and ZServer
by Phil Harris 18 Feb '99

18 Feb '99

Hi all, I'm sat here thnking to my self, 'surely I could use the apache version of Zope for HTTP and use the ZServer for FTP'ing all content to it'. What this would mean is that for straight DTML content I could use, let's say Homesite, an HTML editor on Win32, that has it's own FTP site management facility. Sounds good to me. Can anyone see any problems with doing this? Would Zope care if both the Apache and ZServer parts were running side-by-side? TIA Phil

2 1

Re: [Zope] (Fwd) Zope musings
by Phil Harris 18 Feb '99

18 Feb '99

Not quite, I am lookinginto using ZServer/Apache together to facilitate this, My thinking is, use Apache/PCGI to manage http access and use ZServer to manage FTP access, this would then mean that users of FP could create a web locally and then when finished 'publish' it to the web via FTP. Theory seems sound to me, now all I need to do is get the ZServer to work 8^) HTH Phil ----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Everitt <paul(a)digicool.com> To: Scott Robertson <sroberts(a)codeit.com> Cc: The Zope Group <zope(a)zope.org> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 1999 12:20 PM Subject: Re: [Zope] (Fwd) Zope musings > >Scott Robertson wrote: >> Oh God, I can't belive I'm about to suggest this but... How hard would it > >You need a refresher course at the Reeducation Center :^) > >> be to support the frontpage extensions through Zope? (I feel so dirty) >> Unfortunatly some of our clients use frontpage. Which at the moment keeps >> me from moving them into Zope. > >Last I looked into this, MS provides only binary extensions to integrate >with the web server. It really isn't possible to integrate it into Zope >-- it specifically diddles files on the filesystem through a CGI script. > >--Paul > > >_______________________________________________ >Zope maillist - Zope(a)zope.org >http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope >

1 0