July 2006 - Zope-Dev

buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin6
by buildbot＠zope.com 09 Jul '06

09 Jul '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin6. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6544 Blamelist: andreasjung,benji,benji_york,jim BUILD FAILED: failed compile sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
by buildbot＠zope.com 09 Jul '06

09 Jul '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6544 Blamelist: andreasjung,benji,benji_york,jim BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

Re: [Zope3-dev] pkg_resources or pkgutil?
by Fred Drake 09 Jul '06

09 Jul '06

On 5/25/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <philipp(a)weitershausen.de> wrote: > I think they do pretty much the same thing (but I could be mistaken). > Are they interchangeable? If not, are they compatible so that we just > add both ways to both files? If they're not compatible, which one should > we use in the future? Looks like no one bothered to answer this. :-( No, they aren't equivalent. The pkg_resources flavor is only effective if pkg_resources is available; I don't think that should be assumed. The pkgutil.extend_path version should be used as the fallback when pkg_resources is not available. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "Every sin is the result of a collaboration." --Lucius Annaeus Seneca

1 0

Re: Through-the-web reStructuredText
by Tres Seaver 08 Jul '06

08 Jul '06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > Tres Seaver wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Michael Haubenwallner wrote: >>> Tres Seaver wrote: >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> Jim Fulton wrote: >>>> >>>>> Zope 3, as releases is not affected by the security hole that >>>>> has plagued Zope 2, however, Michael Haubenwallner has pointed >>>>> out that some add-on-products, such as zwiki and bugtracker, may >>>>> provide TTW reST. >>>> They appear to be "safe" for the moment, but not because they >>>> intentionally disable file inclusion: rather, they have a bug (they >>>> set >>>> the 'encoding' to 'unicode', which then causes an exception). >>>> >>> Both restructuredText directives 'include' and 'raw' have an 'encoding' >>> option to set the name of text encoding of the external data file/raw >>> data (file or URL), it defaults to the document's encoding (if >>> specified). >>> >>> .. include:: filename.ext >>> :encoding: utf-8 >>> >>> .. raw:: html >>> :file: filename.ext >>> :encoding: utf-8 >>> >>> should work as expected >>> >>> Michael >> >> >> Verified. Both wikis and bugtracker issues are capable of including >> arbitrary files using that spelling (in an instance created from today's >> Zope3 trunk, anyway). >> >> > > Zope3 accesses docutils in a single point atm: > zope.app.renderer.rest.ReStructuredTextToHTMLRenderer.render() > > All objects created from the factory zope.source.rest are rendered here. > It should be possible to configure the docutils parser (and its > directives) by adjusting the 'settings_overrides' values. > > I think the same can be done (and is done already) for Zope2.x in > lib.python.reStructuredText.render() with the 'settings' dictionary. > > That way it would be possible to make the parser usage configurable and > no need to use a patched docutils. In Zope2 land, the module is still available, and can be used by other code (which may not know of that issue). I'm *not* in favor of shipping an un-patched docutils until we work this out. For instance, perhaps we should be patching docutils to make the *default* settings disable file inclusion and 'raw'; then the trusted code which wanted to render reST which legitimately needed those features could enable them explicitly. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEr6pm+gerLs4ltQ4RAhquAJ4yotGOLN5778NdQ5Fh2oO7wCRNIACfcZ3N //xqhLuWYrUAGEU5j8B214c= =CHum -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin6
by buildbot＠zope.com 08 Jul '06

08 Jul '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin6. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6527 Blamelist: chrisw,hdima,oestermeier,philikon,srichter,tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed compile sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
by buildbot＠zope.com 08 Jul '06

08 Jul '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6527 Blamelist: chrisw,hdima,oestermeier,philikon,srichter,tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
by buildbot＠zope.com 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6524 Blamelist: chrisw,hdima,oestermeier,philikon,srichter BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin6
by buildbot＠zope.com 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin6. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6510 Blamelist: tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed compile sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
by buildbot＠zope.com 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6510 Blamelist: tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
by buildbot＠zope.com 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 6509 Blamelist: tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0