Zope-Dev February 2008

zope-dev@zope.dev

46 participants
66 discussions

Directory resource factories
by Malthe Borch 10 Mar '08

10 Mar '08

The z3c.pt-package now provides a template class for plain text files like .css and .js---using the ${<python expression>}-syntax. I'd like to integrate it with browser resources such that filename.css.<some extension for z3c.pt text templates> would be sent through the template engine. Now, the DirectoryResource-class defined in zope.app.publisher.browser.directoryresource provides a dictionary of resource factories for a number of standard file extensions. Shouldn't this be pluggable using the component architecture? It would adapt to IResourceFactory. \malthe

2 5

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 29 Feb '08

29 Feb '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Feb 28 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Fri Feb 29 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Feb 28 21:59:19 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009180.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Feb 28 22:00:49 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009181.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Feb 28 22:02:20 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009182.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Feb 28 22:03:50 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009183.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Feb 28 22:05:21 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009184.html

1 0

Re: SVN: zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/ Removed 'shared-blob-dir' from blobstorage section
by Christian Zagrodnick 28 Feb '08

28 Feb '08

Hi On 2008-02-27 21:00:39 +0100, Nikolay Kim <fafhrd(a)datacom.kz> said: > Log message for revision 84351: > Removed 'shared-blob-dir' from blobstorage section could you tell me why you've removed the shared-blob-dir option? One could argue to remove the whole blob support from the recipe, but just removing the shared option is not useful IMHO. > > Changed: > U zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/CHANGES.txt > U zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/zc/recipe/filestorage/__init__.py > > -=- > Modified: zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/CHANGES.txt > =================================================================== > --- zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/CHANGES.txt 2008-02-27 19:49:55 UTC (rev 84350) > +++ zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/CHANGES.txt 2008-02-27 20:00:37 UTC (rev 84351) > @@ -2,6 +2,12 @@ > CHANGES > ======= > > +1.1.0 (2008-??-??) > +------------------ > + > +- Removed 'shared-blob-dir' from blobstorage section. > + > + > 1.0.0 (2007-11-03) > ------------------ > > > Modified: zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/zc/recipe/filestorage/__init__.py > =================================================================== > --- > zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/zc/recipe/filestorage/__init__.py 2008-02-27 > 19:49:55 UTC (rev 84350) > +++ > zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/zc/recipe/filestorage/__init__.py 2008-02-27 > 20:00:37 UTC (rev 84351) > @@ -41,12 +41,10 @@ > blob_dir = os.path.join(buildout['buildout']['directory'], > blob_dir) > options['blob-dir'] = blob_dir > - shared = options.get('shared-blob-dir', 'no') > > options['zconfig'] = template % dict( > path=path, > - blob_dir=blob_dir, > - shared=shared) > + blob_dir=blob_dir) > > def install(self): > if self.make_part: > @@ -70,7 +68,6 @@ > <zodb> > <blobstorage> > blob-dir %(blob_dir)s > - shared-blob-dir %(shared)s > <filestorage> > path %(path)s > </filestorage> -- Christian Zagrodnick gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstrasse 29 · 06112 halle/saale www.gocept.com · fon. +49 345 12298894 · fax. +49 345 12298891

1 0

buildout 'versions' and 'develop' conflict
by Christophe Combelles 28 Feb '08

28 Feb '08

Hi, It seems that the 'versions' information in a buildout has a priority over 'develop'? What I wanted is to use the exact versions of the KGS: extends = http://download.zope.org/zope3.4/versions.cfg versions = versions Then for a particular egg (say, z3c.menu), use a develop-egg instead: develop = . z3c.menu However the develop-egg is never used, because of the version information. Shouldn't the 'develop' directive have a priority? Or is there another way to to what I want? thanks, Christophe

12 46

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 28 Feb '08

28 Feb '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Feb 27 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Thu Feb 28 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Feb 27 20:57:40 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009175.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Feb 27 20:59:10 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009176.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Feb 27 21:00:40 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009177.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Feb 27 21:02:10 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009178.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Feb 27 21:03:41 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009179.html

1 0

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 27 Feb '08

27 Feb '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Feb 26 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Wed Feb 27 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Feb 26 20:59:59 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009170.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Feb 26 21:01:29 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009171.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Feb 26 21:02:59 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009172.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Feb 26 21:04:29 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009173.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Feb 26 21:06:00 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009174.html

1 0

Re: buildout 'versions' and 'develop' conflict
by Fred Drake 26 Feb '08

26 Feb '08

[Originally sent to Martin only; meant to send to the list.] On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Martijn Faassen <faassen(a)startifact.com> wrote: > Meanwhile, you're satisfied already with actually looking at setup.py of > the develop package and then repeating the version number *too*. It's > fascinating how people look differently at these things, isn't it? Heh. We have buildouts where multiple versions of a package are used by different parts of what's built. There's a real value in separating the meanings of "develop" and version requirements. We also typically work with the following settings, just to make sure we don't leave any information out of our build configuration: [buildout] allow-picked-versions = false use-dependency-links = false Having to repeat on ocaission isn't wonderful, but it's actually pretty unusual, and far better than leaving something out that can't be recovered later. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller

1 0

Zope Tests:
by Zope Tests Summarizer 26 Feb '08

26 Feb '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Feb 25 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Tue Feb 26 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were no messages.

1 0

zc.recipe.filestorage bug
by Nikolay Kim 26 Feb '08

26 Feb '08

Hello, Seem zc.recipe.filestorage has bug in blob-dir for this buildout config [var] recipe = zc.recipe.filestorage blob-dir = parts/varblobs zc.recipe.filestorage generates <zodb> <blobstorage> blob-dir ../parts/varblobs shared-blob-dir no <filestorage> path ../parts/var/Data.fs </filestorage> </blobstorage> </zodb> But 'shared-blob-dir' defined only for 'zeoclient'

1 0

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 25 Feb '08

25 Feb '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Feb 24 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Mon Feb 25 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Feb 24 21:17:21 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009165.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Feb 24 21:18:51 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009166.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Feb 24 21:20:21 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009167.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Feb 24 21:21:51 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009168.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Feb 24 21:23:21 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009169.html

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Zope-Dev February 2008