October 2007 - Zope-Dev

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 06 Oct '07

06 Oct '07

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Oct 5 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Sat Oct 6 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Fri Oct 5 20:54:37 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008446.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Fri Oct 5 20:56:07 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008447.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Fri Oct 5 20:57:38 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008448.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Fri Oct 5 20:59:09 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008449.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Fri Oct 5 21:00:39 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008450.html

1 0

Changing DateTime to use pytz
by Amos Latteier 05 Oct '07

05 Oct '07

Hello, I'm working on changing DateTime to use pytz for timezone information. The motivation is that DateTime doesn't have up to date daylight savings time information. Rather than maintaining this stuff in DateTime it seems easier to delegate this work to a package that does this jobs better and is kept up to date. My approach is to use timezone information from pytz if it is importable, otherwise, the existing DateTime timezone information is used. I haven't made other changes to DateTime, and all existing timezones that DateTime defines are still supported (even though pytz doesn't know about some of the weird timezone names that DateTime defines.) I wanted to see if people are interested in seeing this go into Zope. One issue is that there is a daylight savings change coming up in a few weeks and so it might be nice to make these changes available to folks before then if possible. Thanks! -Amos

7 16

WSGI2
by Jim Fulton 05 Oct '07

05 Oct '07

There's work going on to create a second version of WSGI. Last time, we didn't pay much attention until WSGI was a done deal. This time, I think it would be better if we were involved earlier. Unfortunately, I don't have time to pay attention. Does anyone else? Jim P.S. I'd lobe to avoid typos. Especially in subject lines. :/ -- Jim Fulton Zope Corporation

2 1

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 05 Oct '07

05 Oct '07

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Oct 4 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Fri Oct 5 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Oct 4 20:51:55 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008441.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Oct 4 20:53:26 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008442.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Oct 4 20:54:56 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008443.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Oct 4 20:56:26 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008444.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Oct 4 20:57:56 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008445.html

1 0

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 04 Oct '07

04 Oct '07

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Oct 3 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Thu Oct 4 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Oct 3 20:51:44 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008436.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Oct 3 20:53:14 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008437.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Oct 3 20:54:45 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008438.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Oct 3 20:56:15 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008439.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Oct 3 20:57:46 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008440.html

1 0

zope.fssync in Zope 2.11
by Thomas Lotze 04 Oct '07

04 Oct '07

I just realized that Zope 2.11.0-a1 contains zope.app.fssync but not zope.fssync. This doesn't make much sense to me given that the former depends on the latter. Is there a good reason for it, should both be included, or none of the two? -- Thomas

2 2

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 03 Oct '07

03 Oct '07

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Oct 2 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Wed Oct 3 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Oct 2 20:55:34 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008431.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Oct 2 20:57:05 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008432.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Oct 2 20:58:36 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008433.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Oct 2 21:00:06 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008434.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Oct 2 21:01:37 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008435.html

1 0

Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ Merge r80451 from trunk
by Philipp von Weitershausen 02 Oct '07

02 Oct '07

According to CHANGES.txt, you're fixing a bug. Where's the test that exercises that the bug fix code? (Yes, I'm going to get anal about this.) To anybody, the fix will look a bit dubious. At least I personally am wondering how simply changing the datatype in the ZConfig schema will work... A comment explaining *why* this fixes the problem would clear up any doubts. Such a commonent could very well have been placed in the above mentioned test that's missing. Please provide it. Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Log message for revision 80452: > Merge r80451 from trunk > > Changed: > U Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt > U Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Zope2/Startup/zopeschema.xml > > -=- > Modified: Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt > =================================================================== > --- Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt 2007-10-01 19:48:13 UTC (rev 80451) > +++ Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt 2007-10-01 20:05:49 UTC (rev 80452) > @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ > > Bugs fixed > > + - Launchpad #147201: treat container-class in zope.conf as a string, > + making it possible to use types from extra products directories. > + > - Collector #2358: backported fix making 'Products' package a real > "namespace package" from the trunk. > > > Modified: Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Zope2/Startup/zopeschema.xml > =================================================================== > --- Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Zope2/Startup/zopeschema.xml 2007-10-01 19:48:13 UTC (rev 80451) > +++ Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Zope2/Startup/zopeschema.xml 2007-10-01 20:05:49 UTC (rev 80452) > @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ > </description> > </key> > > - <key name="container-class" datatype=".python_dotted_path"> > + <key name="container-class" datatype="string"> > <description> > Change the contiainer class a (mounted) database uses on a > per-database basis to support a different container than a plain -- http://worldcookery.com -- Professional Zope documentation and training

1 0

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 02 Oct '07

02 Oct '07

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Oct 1 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Tue Oct 2 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Mon Oct 1 20:52:19 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008426.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Mon Oct 1 20:53:50 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008427.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Mon Oct 1 20:55:20 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008428.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Mon Oct 1 20:56:51 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008429.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Mon Oct 1 20:58:21 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-October/008430.html

1 0

products not found when initializing zodb
by Wichert Akkerman 01 Oct '07

01 Oct '07

(I've filed this at https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/147201 as well) For a Plone site I am using a separate ZODB for the catalog so I can tune it a bit. I do this using the standard method in zope.conf: <zodb_db catalog> mount-point /plone.org/portal_catalog container-class Products.CMFPlone.CatalogTool.CatalogTool <zeoclient> server 127.0.0.1:5010 storage 2 name catalogstorage var /srv/plone.org/buildout/parts/instance1/var </zeoclient> </zodb_db> This works perfect in a normal Zope2 instance. But when I use buildout CMFPlone is stored in a separate directory that is listed in a products line in zope.conf: instancehome /srv/plone.org/buildout/parts/instance1 products /srv/plone.org/buildout/products products /srv/plone.org/buildout/parts/productdistros products /srv/plone.org/buildout/parts/plone the result is that Zope no longer starts: Error: The object named by "Products.CMFPlone.CatalogTool.CatalogTool" could not be imported Traceback (most recent call last): File "/srv/plone.org/buildout/parts/zope2/lib/python/Zope2/Startup/datatypes.py", line 94, in importable_name package = __import__(n, g, g, component) ImportError: No module named CMFPlone which is a bit of a showstopper for this deployment. Does anyone know how this can be fixed or worked around? There is a fair amount of deep magic to the way Zope handles Products.* so I'ld like a few suggestions before I delve into the deep. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <wichert(a)wiggy.net> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.

3 2