March 2007 - Zope-Dev

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 14 Mar '07

14 Mar '07

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Mar 13 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Wed Mar 14 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Mar 13 21:54:48 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007438.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Mar 13 21:56:19 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007439.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Mar 13 21:57:49 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007440.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Mar 13 21:59:19 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007441.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Mar 13 22:00:49 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007442.html

1 0

mvcc related error?
by Chris Withers 14 Mar '07

14 Mar '07

(I tried to send this to zodb-dev(a)zope.org but got a relay error from ns2.zope.com :-S) Hi All, One of the users on one of my projects saw this error under high load: Module Products.QueueCatalog.QueueCatalog, line 458, in reindexObject Module Products.QueueCatalog.QueueCatalog, line 341, in catalog_object Module Products.QueueCatalog.QueueCatalog, line 284, in _update Module ZODB.Connection, line 732, in setstate Module ZODB.Connection, line 765, in _setstate Module ZODB.Connection, line 791, in _load_before_or_conflict Module ZODB.Connection, line 814, in _setstate_noncurrent AssertionError This is on Zope 2.9.4. Any ideas? cheers, Chris

2 2

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Google Summer of Code
by Martijn Pieters 14 Mar '07

14 Mar '07

On 3/14/07, Baiju M <mbaiju(a)zeomega.com> wrote: > I think you added (by mistake?) this link instead: > http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/863.html Whoops, indeed, that's not the right one. Blame late night inattention, brought on by a better half asking when I was going to be done. ;) > I found this one also useful: > http://primates.ximian.com/~federico/docs/summer-of-code-mentoring-howto/in… That's the correct link! Corrected on the Wiki. :) Thanks! -- Martijn Pieters

1 0

Re: [Zope3-dev] Google Summer of Code
by Stephan Richter 13 Mar '07

13 Mar '07

On Sunday 04 March 2007 20:02, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > a) mentors. > > It'd be great if some of the Zope core committers would volunteer to > mentor a student. This doesn't mean you will definitely end up > mentoring one, just show your willingness. I offer to mentor any student that is interested in participating. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training

3 4

Zope Tests:
by Zope Tests Summarizer 13 Mar '07

13 Mar '07

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Mar 12 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Tue Mar 13 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were no messages.

1 0

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 9 OK, 2 Unknown
by Jens Vagelpohl 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Subject: UNKNOWN : CMF-2.1 Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux > From: CMF Unit Tests > Date: Sun Mar 11 22:42:15 EDT 2007 > URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2007-March/004319.html > > Subject: UNKNOWN : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux > From: CMF Unit Tests > Date: Sun Mar 11 22:45:16 EDT 2007 > URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2007-March/004321.html I've taken a quick look at the cause of failure, which is the testrunner module in <zope>/lib/python/zope/testing/testrunner.py. I compared it to the code on the Zope 2.10 branch and to my untrained eye it looks like some patches applied to the 2.10 branch have not been ported to the zope.testing package used on the Zope 2 trunk. These svn log entries from the Zope 2.10 testrunner.py module look like candidates: - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r68925 | Zen | 2006-06-30 13:49:37 +0200 (Fri, 30 Jun 2006) | 3 lines Fix ordering of testSetUp and testTearDown calls, and allow new style classes to be used as Layers by explicitly ignoring the object baseclass. - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r68745 | Zen | 2006-06-19 08:55:27 +0200 (Mon, 19 Jun 2006) | 1 line Merged /zope.testing/branches/stub-testSetUp_in_layer 68684:68744 I'm not exactly sure how to proceed, maybe the patch author can comment? jens -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFF9UN7RAx5nvEhZLIRApL3AJ0cX2A6tS0g3VakOoQnRYreaMFSJwCfdt2r 2LkEjCeJEhunZb/D2fIgzjs= =7UlC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Mar 11 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Mon Mar 12 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Mar 11 21:58:04 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007433.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Mar 11 21:59:34 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007434.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Mar 11 22:01:04 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007435.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Mar 11 22:02:34 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007436.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Mar 11 22:04:04 EDT 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007437.html

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] Upcoming Zope releases (fwd)
by Andreas Jung 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

Please stay on the list! Bugs that are not reported through the bugtracker don't exist by definition :-) So the answer is: no. -aj ------------ Forwarded Message ------------ Date: 12. März 2007 12:16:15 +0100 From: "M. Krainer" <mkrainer05(a)gmail.com> To: Andreas Jung <lists(a)zopyx.com> Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Upcoming Zope releases On 3/10/07, Andreas Jung <lists(a)zopyx.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to release in about two weeks: > > - Zope 2.8.9 Will 2.8.9 include a fix for the problem with the zeo server conflict resolution? For details and solution please see: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2006-June/027573.html http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2006-June/027583.html -- Markus ---------- End Forwarded Message ---------- -- ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: info(a)zopyx.com - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376 Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, Handelsregister A 381535 Geschäftsführer/Gesellschafter: ZOPYX Limited, Birmingham, UK ------------------------------------------------------------------------ E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting

1 0

Zope Tests: 7 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 11 Mar '07

11 Mar '07

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Mar 10 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Sun Mar 11 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.6 Python-2.1.3 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sat Mar 10 21:03:30 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007426.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.6 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sat Mar 10 21:05:00 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007427.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sat Mar 10 21:06:30 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007428.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sat Mar 10 21:08:00 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007429.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sat Mar 10 21:09:31 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007430.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sat Mar 10 21:11:01 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007431.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sat Mar 10 21:12:31 EST 2007 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007432.html

1 0

Proposal for optimized Blob handling
by Christian Theune 11 Mar '07

11 Mar '07

Hi, [modified slightly from a similar proposal to zope3-dev to match Zope 2's publisher] I'm writing up a proposal for the ZODB to make even more efficient Blob handling possible. This includes not copying the data from an uploaded file, but using a `link` operation when possible. However, the HTTPRequest class currently uses the default implementation of the cgi module's FieldStorage. I propose to create a small subclass to override the `make_file` method to use `NamedTemporaryFile` instead of `TemporaryFile` to allow the file being accessible from a filename so I can apply a `link` operation. Notice: The FieldStorage explicitly provides the `make_file` method to allow overriding in this sense. Does anybody feel like this would be a bad idea? Christian -- gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany www.gocept.com - ct(a)gocept.com - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 - fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development

9 20