December 2008 - Zope-Dev

Zope Tests: 3 OK, 3 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 06 Dec '08

06 Dec '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Dec 5 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Sat Dec 6 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=7) : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Dec 5 20:36:57 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010600.html Subject: FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Dec 5 20:38:28 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010601.html Subject: FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Dec 5 20:39:58 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010602.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Dec 5 20:32:27 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010597.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Dec 5 20:33:57 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010598.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Dec 5 20:35:27 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010599.html

1 0

Show Stopping Bug
by Tim Cook 05 Dec '08

05 Dec '08

Hi All, I started a conversation on the Zope Users list back in October about an issue I had with the Object field in zope.schema. http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-users/2008-October/008215.html After comments acknowledging that this is a real problem there still wasn't any activity on it. I did some investigation myself and "I THINK" I found the problem. So I filed this bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/301226 I am not a great Python programmer nor do I know a lot about the ZCA internals. I did make a suggestion as to the solution and it seems to work for me but it really needs an expert to look at it and see what ramifications it may have on other aspects of the ZCA. I will REALLY appreciate someone with expertise in this area taking a look at this. I have spent nearly one year on this project http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/dev/OSHIP+Developer%27s+Wiki (completely open source) and I think it is a serious black eye to have to tell users of my platform that they have to replace, by hand, a portion of the Zope core in order to make it function. Thanks, Tim -- Timothy Cook, MSc Health Informatics Research & Development Services LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook Skype ID == timothy.cook ************************************************************** *You may get my Public GPG key from popular keyservers or * *from this link http://timothywayne.cook.googlepages.com/home* **************************************************************

1 0

Zope Tests: 3 OK, 2 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 05 Dec '08

05 Dec '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Dec 4 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Fri Dec 5 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Dec 4 20:28:38 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010595.html Subject: FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Dec 4 20:30:08 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010596.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Dec 4 20:22:37 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010592.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Dec 4 20:24:07 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010593.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Dec 4 20:25:37 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010594.html

1 0

[Fwd: Zope Tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed]
by Tres Seaver 05 Dec '08

05 Dec '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Any chance you can get these worked out? I looked at the Products.Five tests today, with the following observations: - Not as many tests fail if I run '-s Products.Five' as when I run the whole set: in particular, the first two in 'aqlegacy_ftest.txt' ('HTTPError', 'falcon.pt' not called) don't occur. - The next 'aqlegacy_ftest.txt' failure is because the content provider is not being acquisition wrapped. The remaining failure is likely due to the same cause (it is on the following line). - All the failing tests in Products.Five come from code which relies on zope.testbrowser, via the Products.Five.testbrowser shim. - The first failing zope.testbrowser test (README.txt line 1162) seems to be due to a change somewhere which contradicts the comment just below the example: "Here, the body is left in place because it isn't form data." - The testing requirements for zope.testbrowser itself are really snarled up: it pulls in basically all of Zope3. - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Zope Tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:00:03 +0100 From: Zope Tests Summarizer <zope-tests(a)epy.co.at> To: Zope-dev <zope-dev(a)zope.org> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.web.zope.devel Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Nov 28 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Sat Nov 29 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Test failures - ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=3) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Nov 28 20:38:21 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-November/010572.html Subject: FAILED (failures=3) : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Nov 28 20:39:51 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-November/010573.html Tests passed OK - --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Nov 28 20:32:16 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-November/010568.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Nov 28 20:33:51 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-November/010569.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Nov 28 20:35:21 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-November/010570.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Nov 28 20:36:51 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-November/010571.html _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev(a)zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJMWKt+gerLs4ltQ4RAh0MAJ4gBJZOdsRw+Q8ZqhOU+VlajxuC6wCgw0BP oCiVHZ0ig6wiItTk9clcBJU= =KihL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

8 14

Re: [Zope-dev] [Fwd: Zope Tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed]
by Tres Seaver 04 Dec '08

04 Dec '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sidnei da Silva wrote: > Hi Tres, > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Tres Seaver <tseaver(a)palladion.com> wrote: >> My hypothesis is that one or more of the 'svn:externals' changes Sidnei >> made to bring in 2.6-compatible packages is the culprit (maybe an >> interaction between several of them). I am attaching readable diff for >> each of 'lib/python', 'lib/python/zope', and 'lib/python/zope/app'. >> >> As an aside / vent: the reason for the now-removed EXTERNALS.txt files >> was to keep the canonical information about the externals in a diffable >> file: why subversion can't do a proper diff on its own line-oriented >> property is beyond me. Another benefit of an EXTERNALS.txt file was >> that it could be inspected in the web view of a directory, which isn't >> true for the svn:externals property itself. > > I agree with your analysis: it is certainly related to the changes in > externals, but maybe not for the reason you think! Last I looked at > this, I found out that the failing zope.testbrowser test did not exist > in the previous version of zope.testbrowser that we were pulling as > externals. So I think that means we are missing an upgrade to some > external that makes zope.testbrowser tests work when run standalone. > That's just my feeling though, and I don't have much right now to back > this claim. (CC'ing the newsgroup). OK, so the buildout.cfg for zope.testbrowser 3.5.1 (the version now linked into the Zope trunk) has: [versions] mechanize = 0.1.9 setuptools = 0.6c9 zope.testbrowser = zope.publisher = 3.5.1 zope.app.publication = 3.4.2 The version of zope.app.publication linked into the Zope trunk is 3.5.0 (bumped from 3.4.3). However, zope.app.publication is not listed as any kind of dependency in either version's setup.py. In fact, it isn't imported (or referenced in ZCML) anywhere other than in the buildout.cfg :(. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJOAoY+gerLs4ltQ4RAnkMAJ49XjAka9QWdnuLLIQO6rbqk/fWFgCeMlZ9 cYqP4W6I28xMOKGfTW20WTk= =iitF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: zope.app.publisher/trunk/ - Menu items registered with <browser:page/> were not re-registered after the
by Tres Seaver 04 Dec '08

04 Dec '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christian Zagrodnick wrote: > Log message for revision 93600: > - Menu items registered with <browser:page/> were not re-registered after the > first functional test layer ran. In any subsequent functional test layer the > items where not availabe (introduced in 3.5.0a3). > > I removed the "transient registry" for menuitems registered with the page > directives. Since no test fails without it and I have a test which fails with > it I feel quite comfortable. If this code is still required add a test case > and proper clean up code. > > > > > Changed: > U zope.app.publisher/trunk/CHANGES.txt > A zope.app.publisher/trunk/src/zope/app/publisher/browser/tests/menutestlayer.zcml > A zope.app.publisher/trunk/src/zope/app/publisher/browser/tests/test_menutestlayer.py > U zope.app.publisher/trunk/src/zope/app/publisher/browser/viewmeta.py > > -=- > Modified: zope.app.publisher/trunk/CHANGES.txt > =================================================================== > --- zope.app.publisher/trunk/CHANGES.txt 2008-12-04 05:11:53 UTC (rev 93599) > +++ zope.app.publisher/trunk/CHANGES.txt 2008-12-04 07:19:40 UTC (rev 93600) > @@ -8,6 +8,10 @@ > - Added possibility to specify custom item class in menuItem, subMenuItem > and addMenuItem directives using the ``item_class`` argument (LP #291865). > > +- Menu items registered with <browser:page/> were not re-registered after the > + first functional test layer ran. In any subsequent functional test layer the > + items where not availabe (introduced in 3.5.0a3). > + > 3.5.2a1 (2008-10-23) > ==================== That CHANGES.txt is out of whack: there is no 3.5.2a1 tag in SVN (nor should there be: we don't do alphas for bugfix-only micro-releases). Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJN9kV+gerLs4ltQ4RAvKCAJ9KuilO6CBxKjlVfQPDYpX/hMio7QCfQ/Ns Vwefmd1DgxW1xjPHxDX31fk= =vklM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Zope Tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 04 Dec '08

04 Dec '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Dec 3 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Thu Dec 4 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Dec 3 20:26:53 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010590.html Subject: FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Dec 3 20:28:23 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010591.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Dec 3 20:20:52 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010586.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Dec 3 20:22:22 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010587.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Dec 3 20:23:52 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010588.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Dec 3 20:25:22 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-December/010589.html

1 0

Update Zope2.9/2.10 pt_BR translation
by Rudá Porto Filgueiras 03 Dec '08

03 Dec '08

Hi, I did some work to update pt_BR zope.po translation. But I also want to make sure zope.pot is updated to merge new strings. I read this doc but I guess it apply only to Zope3 (Zope2 don't have i18nextract script)? http://svn.zope.org/zope.app.locales/trunk/src/zope/app/locales/TRANSLATE.t… Should I get Zope 3.2 branch to update these translations? And so on, to update Zope2.10 get Zope3.3 branch? One problem now to people that work with Plone2.5/3.x and use Zope3 packages lilke zope.schema and zope.formlib is the need to update translations. Regards, -- ===================================== Rudá Porto Filgueiras Weimar Consultoria http://python-blog.blogspot.com Hospedagem Plone, Django, Zope 3, Grok... http://www.pytown.com =====================================

1 0

zope.index
by Dan Korostelev 03 Dec '08

03 Dec '08

Hi people. I just removed zope.testing from the zope.index dependency and replaced zope.testing.doctest imports with plain python doctest and it seems to work with python 2.4 and 2.5 here. Now, it only depends on ZODB3 and zope.interface, which is nice :) Is there any objections on this? If no, can someone make a release on PyPI of this package? -- WBR, Dan Korostelev

6 7

zope.dottedname and releases
by Chris Withers 03 Dec '08

03 Dec '08

Hi All, How do I go about getting myself added to the Zope 3 packages so I can do releases to PyPI? (my PyPI username is chrisw) I'm not planning on doing this without getting consent from the powers that be (unless its trivial, as in this case) but it'd be handy to roll out releases if needed. The case in hand is zope.dottedname. After I'd released yet another package that does exactly the same thing (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/resolve) a friend told me about zope.dottedname and I thought I'd reduce the amount of duplicate code on PyPI. I merged my testcases into those for zope.dottedname and tidied up the docs a bit, no changes to the code at all. However, I'd like to role out a 3.4.3 release with these new docs in. Can I do it? Failing that, could someone else please? cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

2 2