January 2009 - Zope-Dev

adapting to None
by Chris Withers 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Hi All, I have a need to be able to adapting certain objects to None, eg: def some_adapter(obj): if something: return None return somethingelse This is tricky, since returning None from an adapter results in a TypeError. I eventually came up with the idea of having a subclass of Interface do what I needed: empty = object() class IFieldType(Interface): def __call__(self,*args,**kw): r = Interface.__call__(*args,**kw) if r is empty: return None return r I suspect this would work with the python implementation of Interface, but it certainly doesn't with the C implementation. What am I doing wrong and how can I achieve what I'm after? cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

5 13

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Jan 8 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Jan 9 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Jan 8 20:30:17 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010801.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Jan 8 20:31:49 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010802.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Jan 8 20:33:19 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010803.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Jan 8 20:34:50 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010804.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Jan 8 20:36:20 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010805.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Jan 8 20:37:50 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010806.html

1 0

bug in zope.testing 3.7.1?
by Chris Withers 09 Jan '09

09 Jan '09

Hi Guys, Line 396 of doctest.py contains code which is, at best, platform-specific (and so a bug) or, more likely, irrelevent. I have the following code that runs the tests in all my package's docs: def test_suite(): suite = unittest.TestSuite() for path in \ glob(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__),'..','docs','*.txt')): suite.addTest( DocFileSuite(path, optionflags=REPORT_NDIFF|ELLIPSIS) ) return suite ...which runs fine on Windows (which makes me think that whole ValueError raise is bogus) and yet fails on Linux. Does anyone know why that raise is there? cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

3 3

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 08 Jan '09

08 Jan '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Jan 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Jan 8 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Jan 7 20:29:55 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010795.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Jan 7 20:31:25 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010796.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Jan 7 20:32:56 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010797.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Jan 7 20:34:26 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010798.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Jan 7 20:35:56 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010799.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Jan 7 20:37:26 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010800.html

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zope.viewlet/trunk/ Removed the dependency on `zope.app.publisher` by moving four simple helper functions into this package and making the interface for describing the ZCML content provider directive explicit.
by Michael Howitz 08 Jan '09

08 Jan '09

Am 08.01.2009 um 08:23 schrieb Christian Theune: > On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 14:45 -0500, Hanno Schlichting wrote: >> Log message for revision 94597: >> Removed the dependency on `zope.app.publisher` by moving four >> simple helper functions into this package and making the interface >> for describing the ZCML content provider directive explicit. > > I dislike the redundancy that got introduced by copying those four > functions. Could it be an idea to move the code and the interface over to the new zope.browser package to avoid the redundancy or is it too far away from "browser code"? Yours sincerely, -- Michael Howitz · mh(a)gocept.com · software developer gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 8 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.selenium/trunk/src/zc/selenium/resources/scripts/user-extensions.js re-added comment action (which was lost by the selenium upgrade I think).
by Benji York 07 Jan '09

07 Jan '09

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Christian Zagrodnick <cz(a)gocept.com> wrote: > > On 07.01.2009, at 14:34, Benji York wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Christian Zagrodnick <cz(a)gocept.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Log message for revision 94571: >>> re-added comment action (which was lost by the selenium upgrade I think). >> >> Can you think of a test that would have prevented this? It's somewhat >> difficult with the nature of Selenium and its extension mechanism. > > A selenium test would be easy :) > > In fact I wonder why zc.selenium doen't actually provide a bin/selenium for > self-testing. Sounds good to me. -- Benji York Senior Software Engineer Zope Corporation

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.selenium/trunk/src/zc/selenium/resources/scripts/user-extensions.js re-added comment action (which was lost by the selenium upgrade I think).
by Benji York 07 Jan '09

07 Jan '09

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Christian Zagrodnick <cz(a)gocept.com> wrote: > Log message for revision 94571: > re-added comment action (which was lost by the selenium upgrade I think). Can you think of a test that would have prevented this? It's somewhat difficult with the nature of Selenium and its extension mechanism. > Changed: > U zc.selenium/trunk/src/zc/selenium/resources/scripts/user-extensions.js > > -=- > Modified: zc.selenium/trunk/src/zc/selenium/resources/scripts/user-extensions.js > =================================================================== > --- zc.selenium/trunk/src/zc/selenium/resources/scripts/user-extensions.js 2009-01-07 12:25:09 UTC (rev 94570) > +++ zc.selenium/trunk/src/zc/selenium/resources/scripts/user-extensions.js 2009-01-07 12:27:10 UTC (rev 94571) > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ > -// User extensions can be added here. > -// > -// Keep this file to avoid mystifying "Invalid Character" error in IE > +// Add a comment action that ignores its arguments > +Selenium.prototype.doComment = function(text, text) { > +}; > > _______________________________________________ > Checkins mailing list > Checkins(a)zope.org > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/checkins -- Benji York Senior Software Engineer Zope Corporation

1 0

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 07 Jan '09

07 Jan '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Jan 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Jan 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Jan 6 20:29:22 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010789.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Jan 6 20:30:53 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010790.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Jan 6 20:32:24 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010791.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Jan 6 20:33:54 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010792.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Jan 6 20:35:24 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010793.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Jan 6 20:36:54 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010794.html

1 0

Sorting for zope.index
by Dan Korostelev 06 Jan '09

06 Jan '09

Hello, fellow zope developers :) I made a "nadako-sorting" branch of zope.index to add sorting support for zope indexes. I defined a new IIndexSort interface that specifies a "sort" method that takes document ids and returns an iterable of those ids, sorted by indexed value. It supports optional "limit" and "reverse" arguments. It also raises KeyError if you pass a docid that is not indexed by this index. Can someone review the interface definition and make any suggestions/objections? I also made an implementation for the FieldIndex that may not be too optimal, but I'm currently most interested in clean and universal IIndexSort definition that any index could efficiently implement. If there's no objections, I'd like to merge it to trunk and start adding sorting features for zope.app.catalog/z3c.indexer, as well as zc.catalog indexes. Thanks in advance! -- WBR, Dan Korostelev

3 8

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 06 Jan '09

06 Jan '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Jan 5 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Jan 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Jan 5 20:30:18 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010783.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Jan 5 20:31:48 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010784.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Jan 5 20:33:19 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010785.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Jan 5 20:34:49 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010786.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Jan 5 20:36:19 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010787.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Jan 5 20:37:49 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-January/010788.html

2 1