December 2009 - Zope-Dev

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 12 Dec '09

12 Dec '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Dec 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Dec 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Dec 11 20:38:39 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013179.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Dec 11 20:40:39 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013180.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Dec 11 20:42:39 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013181.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Dec 11 20:44:39 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013182.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Dec 11 20:46:39 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013183.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Dec 11 20:48:39 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013184.html

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] [Python-Dev] Unittest/doctest formatting differences in 2.7a1?
by Lennart Regebro 12 Dec '09

12 Dec '09

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 21:36, <exarkun(a)twistedmatrix.com> wrote: > Certainly. Perhaps Zope would like to add something to the community > builders page. The Zope Component Architecture would be nice to test like that. Much of the rest of Zope needs massaging between python versions, so that may not be useful. http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/community/trunk/ So anyone who cares to can check to see if their changes have broken things right away, instead of only finding out 6 or 12 or 18 months later. :) Cc:ing zope-dev for opinions. -- Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64

2 1

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 11 Dec '09

11 Dec '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Dec 10 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Dec 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Dec 10 20:38:25 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013173.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Dec 10 20:40:25 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013174.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Dec 10 20:42:25 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013175.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Dec 10 20:44:25 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013176.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Dec 10 20:46:25 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013177.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Dec 10 20:48:25 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013178.html

1 0

z3c.sqlalchemy 1.0.11
by Christophe Combelles 11 Dec '09

11 Dec '09

Hi, There is no tag for z3c.sqlalchemy 1.0.11 http://svn.zope.org/z3c.sqlalchemy/tags/?rev=106375 and the latest package on PyPI is 1.0.12. No other earlier versions. We have an application in production with z3c.sqlalchemy 1.0.11. I don't know how the paquage we use was generated, but we needed to regenerate it, and we found that the revision for 1.0.11 is r78477 May I commit a tag for this version? It would also be good that earlier packages be generated and uploaded to PyPI. I can do it if someone gives me admin access to it. regards, Christophe

3 3

Upcoming Zope releases
by Andreas Jung 10 Dec '09

10 Dec '09

My plan is to release new releases of Zope 2.9 - 2.12 on December 22nd. Andreas -- ZOPYX Ltd. & Co KG \ zopyx group Charlottenstr. 37/1 \ The full-service network for your D-72070 Tübingen \ Python, Zope and Plone projects www.zopyx.com, info(a)zopyx.com \ www.zopyxgroup.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting

1 0

script to help with dependency cleanup
by Reinout van Rees 10 Dec '09

10 Dec '09

Hi, With all the dependency cleanup going on in the ZTK (and grok 1.1alpha) we wanted to try it out with our internal packages. So: removing unneeded dependencies from code. "If you import from it, you must mention it as a dependency in your setup.py", so the setup.py needs cleaning up, too. To make that easier, I made z3c.dependencychecker that gives you a handy report on what to add or remove. Be careful and do some grepping of your own, too. And run the tests. And watch out for the obvious naming problems like PIL/Imaging and ZODB/persistence/btree. Anyway: 1.0 is just out: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/z3c.dependencychecker I've already fixed up grok's grokcore packages with this (and our intenral ones), so it is tested on a reasonable set of packages. Reinout

1 0

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 10 Dec '09

10 Dec '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Dec 9 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Dec 10 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Dec 9 21:19:41 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013167.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Dec 9 21:21:41 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013168.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Dec 9 21:23:41 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013169.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Dec 9 21:25:51 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013170.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Dec 9 21:27:51 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013171.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Dec 9 21:29:56 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013172.html

1 0

Baiju's book on ZCA
by Christophe Combelles 09 Dec '09

09 Dec '09

Hi all ! I've finished translating Baiju's book into french (A Comprehensive Guide to Zope Component Architecture). The bzr branch is here: https://code.launchpad.net/~ccomb/zcadoc/book-fr I've also generated some HTML and PDF output: http://ccomb.gorfou.fr/static/zcadoc/zca-fr.pdf http://ccomb.gorfou.fr/static/zcadoc/zca-fr.html The english version needs more contributions, it has not been updated for a few months and some new chapters are not finished. It would be great that some volonteers help reviewing and completing this book. Christophe

1 0

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 09 Dec '09

09 Dec '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Dec 8 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Dec 9 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Dec 8 20:38:27 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013161.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Dec 8 20:40:27 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013162.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Dec 8 20:42:27 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013163.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Dec 8 20:44:27 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013164.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Dec 8 20:46:27 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013165.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Dec 8 20:48:27 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-December/013166.html

1 0

ZCA proposal
by Gary Poster 08 Dec '09

08 Dec '09

I think I could get fully behind the following proposal that others have made (Shane I think was one of several?). IFoo.adapt(...) IFoo.utility(...) = Why? = - This is a significant improvement in terms of being memorable, as far as I'm concerned. It's also briefer, which is related. - It uses the terms we've already taught. - It is entirely backwards compatible. We don't have to poll the world and hope we didn't miss anyone. - We can make the call syntax for ``adapt`` take multiple arguments. - It is symmetric-ish. - It would potentially allow a place to hang debug/analysis calls, as I showed earlier, but let's not have that debate yet. I can put those somewhere else if I need to. = Why not tuple multi-adaptation in the __call__? = I'm somewhat surprised that some who have been loudest about not breaking backwards compatibility are OK with breaking this, given the two reports from the very small sample we have here of users. I think it is unnecessarily risky for minimal gain, particularly when we have another reasonable option. = But Gary, I thought you didn't like ``adapt``? = No, I don't. I think it is a hindrance to understanding, and I would prefer ``instance``, for example (or maybe ``create``?). That said, people disagree with me. Going along with ``adapt`` but getting this new syntax gets me a lot of improvements from my perspective. I think people on the Launchpad team would be happy with this. I would explain ``adapt`` as "look, it's a factory," but, oh well. Progress usually means compromise. = But Gary, I thought you didn't like ``utility``? = No, I don't. I already gave up on that one, since I didn't have an answer better than "singleton" and I acknowledge that it is not great (either, for different reasons). Gary

11 18