February 2009 - Zope-Dev

Can somebody upload a zope.app.zcmlfiles 3.5.3 release?
by Tres Seaver 06 Feb '09

06 Feb '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ... or grant me the PyPI role needed? http://svn.zope.org/zope.app.zcmlfiles/tags/3.5.3 Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJijb/+gerLs4ltQ4RAnEHAKDJnCwofSVkkPnWbkuGgCtYk3tOzwCfQ0c1 cDnFqEDDoA/tqzTcJHc4LqU= =oFZo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

6 11

Plans for Zope 2.12
by Andreas Jung 06 Feb '09

06 Feb '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, based on an earlier Zope 2.12 thread http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2008-October/033572.html I propose that we get out an alpha version of Zope 2.12 by end of February. http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2008-October/033572.html Major changes: - - dropping Python 2.4 support officially (Python 2.4 is no longer officially supported by the Python developers so we can not safely support it) - - focus on Python 2.6 support for the final release (although there are still some tests failing - more than with Python 2.5). Possibly focus on Python 2.5 support for the alpha phase. Not sure if we want to support Python 2.5 and 2.6 officially at the same time. With the current classification of Python versions within the configure script I would suggest: TARGET=Python 2.6.X ACCEPTABLE=Python 2.5 Python 2.4.X would be basically not acceptable but could be used at your own risk using the --with-python option. - - complete eggification (apparently pretty much done) - - reducing Zope 3 dependencies (apparently pretty much done) - - removing ZClasses completely - - ship with ZODB 3.9 (currently in alpha stage) Rough edges/open points I encountered so far: - - RestrictedPython security audit: such an audit has been made by Stefan and Sidnei. I am not qualified to speak about the correctness of the audit. I assume they know what they were doing. Unless objections one might consider this issue as resolved - if not, please speak up. - - creation of some skripts e.g. "mkzeoinstance" when easy_install-ing the Zope 2 source distro does not seem to work or it is still missing - - how do to a "traditional" SVN checkout of the Zope 2 and the related Zope 3 modules? The Zope2.buildout maintains its dependencies through a KGS - the old-style SVN checkout uses svn:external. I think there is a need for having both and don't know of a save way for keeping the svn:externals and the KGS in sync (without additional manual effort). Andreas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkl3KWoACgkQCJIWIbr9KYyKOwCfVI+gU1AZsIstWies9BVRGr4l +LcAn1MBC0jsed690vpeU2TJzYUz6xQ+ =YZQ/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

12 27

Zope Tests: 6 OK, 4 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 06 Feb '09

06 Feb '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Feb 5 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Feb 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 10 messages: 10 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=6) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 5 21:10:39 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011031.html Subject: FAILED (failures=7) : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 5 21:12:09 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011032.html Subject: FAILED (failures=6) : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 5 21:16:41 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011035.html Subject: FAILED (failures=7) : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 5 21:18:11 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011036.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 5 21:04:34 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011027.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 5 21:06:09 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011028.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 5 21:07:39 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011029.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 5 21:09:09 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011030.html Subject: OK : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 5 21:13:39 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011033.html Subject: OK : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 5 21:15:09 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011034.html

1 0

Differing case for Buildout on Windows
by Sidnei da Silva 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

I've been constantly bitten by a very annoying bug: depending on how you call buildout on Windows, a full rebuild might be triggered, if only the case differs. For example, all the following calls cause buildout to think settings have changed and that things need to be rebuilt. Note only the drive letter changes: c:\Python24\python.exe bin\buildout-script.py -c c:\src\some-project\buildout.cfg c:\Python24\python.exe bin\buildout-script.py -c C:\src\some-project\buildout.cfg C:\Python24\python.exe bin\buildout-script.py -c c:\src\some-project\buildout.cfg C:\Python24\python.exe bin\buildout-script.py -c C:\src\some-project\buildout.cfg Now, I'm wondering what is the best way to fix it. I originally thought of fixing the data as it comes into buildout, but that would cause existing buildouts to all possibly trigger a rebuild. I'm now thinking of fixing the place where buildout detects that the path has been changed as to normalize the path. Thoughts? -- Sidnei da Silva Canonical Ltd. Landscape · Changing the way you manage your systems http://landscape.canonical.com

2 1

dependency cleanup progress report
by Martijn Faassen 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Hi there, After a lot of work we have progress to report on the dependency reduction front: http://faassen.n--tree.net/blog/view/weblog/2009/01/29/0 It's been a lot of work to get this far and there's a huge amount of work to be done still, but there is progress! The second dependency graph is against the trunks of all the packages, as we haven't done the releases yet to make this real. We will look into this tomorrow. We also need to document the various procedures we have been using to do this work so that others can jump in and help us. Regards, Martijn

3 4

Zope Tests: 6 OK, 4 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Feb 4 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Feb 5 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 10 messages: 10 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=6) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 4 21:10:42 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011021.html Subject: FAILED (failures=7) : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 4 21:12:12 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011022.html Subject: FAILED (failures=6) : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 4 21:16:43 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011025.html Subject: FAILED (failures=7) : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 4 21:18:14 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011026.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 4 21:04:32 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011017.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 4 21:06:12 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011018.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 4 21:07:42 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011019.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 4 21:09:12 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011020.html Subject: OK : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 4 21:13:43 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011023.html Subject: OK : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 4 21:15:13 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011024.html

1 0

[KGS 3.4.0] missing python-cjson?
by Sebastien Douche 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Needed by z3c.formjs: ... Getting required 'python-cjson' required by z3c.formjs 0.4.0. -- Sebastien Douche <sdouche(a)gmail.com>

1 0

Fwd: [Checkins] SVN: zope.app.broken/trunk/setup.py zope.app.appsetup is only a test dependency
by Martijn Faassen 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Hi there, This kind of stuff should really be discussed on zope-dev, so I forwarded this here as I didn't see it. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Wolfgang Schnerring <ws(a)gocept.com> Date: Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:12 AM Subject: Re: [Checkins] SVN: zope.app.broken/trunk/setup.py zope.app.appsetup is only a test dependency To: Checkins(a)zope.org Cc: faassen(a)startifact.com * Michael Howitz <mh(a)gocept.com> [2009-02-03 20:20]: > Am 29.01.2009 um 14:37 schrieb Wolfgang Schnerring: >> Log message for revision 95431: >> zope.app.appsetup is only a test dependency > > Why did you move zope.app.appsetup to the test-extra? Besides in the test it > is also used in configure.zcml. So I think it should be declared in the > install requirements. This is strange. You're right, unfortunately, appsetup *is* used outside of the tests. My only explanation is that grep fooled me, because I was convinced this was a proper change to make. I've reverted the change. This probably will cause zope.container to pull in the whole world again :-(, but I don't see a quick way around this, so this will need more careful investigation. Wolfgang

1 0

Zope Tests: 6 OK, 4 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Feb 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Feb 4 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 10 messages: 10 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=6) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 3 21:08:00 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011011.html Subject: FAILED (failures=8) : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 3 21:09:30 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011012.html Subject: FAILED (failures=6) : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 3 21:14:03 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011015.html Subject: FAILED (failures=8) : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 3 21:15:33 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011016.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 3 21:01:57 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011007.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 3 21:03:29 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011008.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 3 21:04:59 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011009.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 3 21:06:29 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011010.html Subject: OK : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 3 21:11:00 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011013.html Subject: OK : Zope[2.buildout]-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Feb 3 21:12:30 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011014.html

1 0

"zope3docs"
by Christian Theune 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

Hi, I've created a project in SVN labelled "zope3docs" and thought I'd let you know what I intend to start doing there. On the sprint last week we came to the conclusion that the current state how Zope 3 and its development process are documented is inadequate: documentation is scattered over many places, none of which can be referred to as "canonical" or "official" as they are (or at least seem) mostly outdated. I started to gather the existing material on how our development process works (including my memory) and try to combine it into a coherent whole without having the distractions of the cruft in the various old places. I also try hard to stay out of the tool business. ;) My short-term goal is to produce a document that I can pass to new developers with reasonable confidence that they know roughly how to move in our community. In the long term I'd also like to incorporate documentation about Zope 3 components themselve there. I'd be happy to get feedback on this and I'll probably come up with some questions if I can't find an answer in the existing documents. Christian -- Christian Theune · ct(a)gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development

6 6