September 2009 - Zope-Dev

Zope Tests: 8 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 21 Sep '09

21 Sep '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Sep 20 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Sep 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Sep 20 20:44:20 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012592.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Sep 20 20:46:20 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012593.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Sep 20 20:48:20 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012594.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Sep 20 20:50:20 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012595.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Sep 20 20:52:20 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012596.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Sep 20 20:54:20 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012597.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Sep 20 20:56:20 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012598.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Sep 20 20:58:20 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012599.html

1 0

Zope Tests: 8 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 20 Sep '09

20 Sep '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Sep 19 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Sep 20 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Sep 19 20:44:10 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012584.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Sep 19 20:46:10 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012585.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Sep 19 20:48:10 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012586.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Sep 19 20:50:10 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012587.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Sep 19 20:52:10 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012588.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Sep 19 20:54:10 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012589.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Sep 19 20:56:10 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012590.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Sep 19 20:58:10 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012591.html

1 0

Zope Tests: 8 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 19 Sep '09

19 Sep '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Sep 18 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Sep 19 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Sep 18 20:49:35 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012576.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Sep 18 20:51:35 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012577.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Sep 18 20:53:35 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012578.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Sep 18 20:55:35 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012579.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Sep 18 20:57:35 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012580.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Sep 18 20:59:35 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012581.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Sep 18 21:01:35 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012582.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Sep 18 21:03:35 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012583.html

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: Zope/trunk/ Cloned ``ZopeVocabularyRegistry`` from ``zope.app.schema``.
by Tres Seaver 18 Sep '09

18 Sep '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hanno Schlichting wrote: > Wouldn't it make sense to move the VocabularyRegistry class into > zope.schema instead of forking it? Nope -- the implementation uses zope.component, which would create a cycle. The fork is really fine here: it is truly only six lines of code (plus tests, docstrings, module headers, etc.). My tests are clearer and more comprehensive, too. :) Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKtA8E+gerLs4ltQ4RAmSeAJ9Nd2FrgfS3t1OAkeA/KaOW4/IV+ACfRTXQ YDYMnUC9s2MS5CIs5qt3wb4= =2hPX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Proposal: rip twisted integration out of Zope2
by Tres Seaver 18 Sep '09

18 Sep '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Two modules do a really complicated and ugly conditional import dance to try and make twisted availabe as an alternative to ZServer. I propose we nuke that dance on the Zope trunk: at this point, we should prefer to do WSGI well, and leave integrating a specific external server out of the core. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKs63C+gerLs4ltQ4RAqGKAKDNnQDs4+2lr7V+H4/e44Rva1pjBgCgrjeC IKkSjsSZIVsBpP3BR1O3PIg= =k8h6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 5

z3c.hashedresource and cache response headers
by Jan-Wijbrand Kolman 18 Sep '09

18 Sep '09

Hi, We're trying to make an integration of z3c.hashedresource into Grok. While working on it we wondered how and where people using z3c.hashedresource set the caching headers for the resources referenced by the URLs generated by z3c.hashedresource. A few random thoughts about this: * zope.browserresource.file.FileResource will set cache response headers that are more or less hardcoded. Do people just use these values? * You probably only want to set "aggressive" cache response headers for resources that are referred to by the URLs generated by z3c.hashedresource. Maybe it is an idea to set these headers in the ++noop++ namespace handler? (although the name "noop" really isn't suitable anymore then - maybe it could be "++cache++" or something). Any ideas about this? regards, jw

2 3

Proposal: Move Products.five.form out to a new package
by Tres Seaver 18 Sep '09

18 Sep '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Most of the remaining zope.app dependencies in the Zope2 trunk are related to Products.five.form. I propose moving all that code out to a new package, e.g. 'five.forms', which can be included by anybody who uses that code. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKs653+gerLs4ltQ4RAhHwAKDHlDoq2u0DkPM9J1dP0163ieVJpgCdEU7M mtZzqX+J2VgKprh1NLJE9Uw= =6jSP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zope.app.security/trunk/ keep trunk version at 0. Update changes
by Hanno Schlichting 18 Sep '09

18 Sep '09

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Alex Chapman<achapman(a)zope.com> wrote: > Log message for revision 103721: > keep trunk version at 0. Update changes I think I've seen the practice of denoting the version on trunk as "zero" from Jim already. It is in conflict with http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/releasing-software.html though. The majority of packages still uses the "version='3.4.2dev'" scheme for trunk or branches. Pointing to the next release to be made with a dev marker. Are there any particular reasons, why this policy should be changed? Hanno

11 30

Zope Tests: 8 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 18 Sep '09

18 Sep '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Sep 17 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Sep 18 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Sep 17 20:44:25 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012568.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Sep 17 20:46:25 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012569.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Sep 17 20:48:25 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012570.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Sep 17 20:50:26 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012571.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Sep 17 20:52:26 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012572.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Sep 17 20:54:26 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012573.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Sep 17 20:56:26 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012574.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Sep 17 20:58:26 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-September/012575.html

1 0

Redesign suggestion for IReRaiseException
by Christian Theune 18 Sep '09

18 Sep '09

Hi, I'd like to suggest a redesign of the IReRaiseException. I found this when reviewing revision 103682 and stumbled over the naming of the interfaces and that the interface only mentions a __call__ to retrieve a fact. IMHO this pattern smells like we should design an interface like this: class IPublisherExceptionInfo(Interface): reraise = Attribute('A boolean indicating whether ' 'this exceptionshould be reraised') Advantage: I find it much easier to read from a conceptual level. Disadvantage: Composition of policy by bundling *many* attributes in this way will be harder. Oppinions? Christian -- Christian Theune · ct(a)gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development

2 4