November 2011 - Zope-Dev

zope-tests - FAILED: 8, OK: 39
by Zope tests summarizer 11 Nov '11

11 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-09 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-10 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [1] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit [2] Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux [3] Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux [4] Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux [5] Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux [6] Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux [7] Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [8] winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052455.html [2] FAILED Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052465.html [3] FAILED Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052466.html [4] FAILED Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052452.html [5] FAILED Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052450.html [6] FAILED Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052459.html [7] FAILED Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052454.html [8] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052453.html

2 1

zope-tests - OK: 46
by Zope tests summarizer 10 Nov '11

10 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-08 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-09 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results --------------

2 1

Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
by Chris Withers 09 Nov '11

09 Nov '11

Any idea what mx1.emailsrvr.com doesn't like? Is it Bejni's address, the email in question or that isn't coming from server1.simplistix.co.uk? cheers, Chris (trying again to get around the crazy zope.org obsession with banning .eml attachments - ie: Thunderbird and others forwarded messages) ------------------------------------------ This is the mail system at host server1.simplistix.co.uk. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system <benji(a)zope.com>: host mx1.emailsrvr.com[98.129.184.3] said: 550 5.7.1 <benji(a)zope.com>: Relay access denied. (in reply to RCPT TO command)

3 2

zope-tests - FAILED: 2, OK: 45
by Zope tests summarizer 09 Nov '11

09 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-07 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-08 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux [1] Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [2] winbot / zope.testing_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052357.html [2] FAILED winbot / zope.testing_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052360.html

2 1

zope.testrunner and nose count doctests differently
by Chris Withers 08 Nov '11

08 Nov '11

Hi All, I'm experimenting with using nose as an alternative to zope.testrunner so I can take advantage of the junit and cobertura compatible xml output offered. However, it appears that doctest counting is different between the two: $ bin/test -m testfixtures.tests.test_docs Running zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests tests: Set up zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests in 0.000 seconds. Ran 316 tests with 0 failures and 0 errors in 0.136 seconds. Tearing down left over layers: Tear down zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests in 0.000 seconds. $ bin/nosetests testfixtures/tests/test_docs.py ................ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 16 tests in 0.134s Does anyone knows why this count is different? What code is counting differently? I'm paranoid that nose might not be running some tests that zope.testrunner is. If you want to take a look at the code, it's here: https://github.com/Simplistix/testfixtures zope.testrunner is used on the master branch, nose on the nose branch. Any help gratefully received! cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

7 10

Re: [Zope-dev] [TIP] zope.testrunner and nose count doctests differently
by Chris Withers 08 Nov '11

08 Nov '11

Hi All, On 07/11/2011 22:25, Michael Foord wrote: > On 07/11/2011 19:51, Mark Sienkiewicz wrote: >> On 11/07/11 12:53, Chris Withers wrote: >>> The only hiccup is that nose doesn't respect a test_suite function by >>> default, so I wrote a plugin to make it do the right thing: >>> >>> Nose people: any idea *why* nose doesn't respect this method? Mark has somewhat misdirected the thread here, either that or I've got in a muddle, anyway, the issue at hand is that nose ignores TestCase.countTestCases(). Any nose people know what that is? > unittest doesn't *require* you to write a test_suite either - the point > of test_suite is to allow you to *customize* the set of tests that are > collected automatically when a test module is loaded. So if you are > providing a test_suite it is because the default automatic collection > strategy isn't enough for you. This is true now, but I'm pretty sure when unittest was introduced, you had to provide a test_suite function for test discovery to work. Of course, that's the dim and distant past and so doesn't really matter. However, the fact that nose ignores a test_suite method is a bug, plain and simple ;-) cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

1 0

zope.schema and Python 3
by Brian Sutherland 08 Nov '11

08 Nov '11

I've managed to port zope.schema to Python 3.2 on a branch (jinty-python3). It gives up Python 2.5 compatibility and depends on six (http://packages.python.org/six/) Any objections to me merging this branch? -- Brian Sutherland

4 8

zope-tests - FAILED: 1, OK: 46
by Zope tests summarizer 08 Nov '11

08 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-06 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-07 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [1] winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052312.html

2 1

New ZTK-Release?
by Michael Howitz 07 Nov '11

07 Nov '11

Hi all, after having the buildbots green again, I think it would be a good point in time for a series new ZTK releases: * 1.0.5 (yes, there are even on the 1.0 branch version updates), * 1.1.3, * 1.2c1 (a new release branch from the trunk) Who is in charge for the ZTK releases? Is there still the ZTK team? Yours sincerely, -- Michael Howitz · mh(a)gocept.com · software developer gocept gmbh & co. kg · Forsterstraße 29 · 06112 Halle (Saale) · Germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 8 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development

2 1

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 3, OK: 45
by Tres Seaver 07 Nov '11

07 Nov '11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/07/2011 08:11 AM, Stephan Richter wrote: > On Monday, November 07, 2011 07:32:04 AM Tres Seaver wrote: >>>> Same as it ever was: who was it again who feels responsible >>>> for maintenance on z3c.form? >>> >>> I am maintaining z3c.form, just not the Windows release, since >>> I have (a) no suitable setup and (b) really no interest to do >>> so. >> >> OK, cool. The test failure here doesn't appear to be related to >> Windows (I think Hanno pinned lxml to work around earlier >> failutres) >> >> http://winbot.zope.org/builders/z3c.form_py_265_32/builds/334/steps/test/log >> >> >> s/stdio > > Fixed. It turned out that this test pointed out a bug in Chameleon > that has now been fixed. So all I needed to do is remove the test. > :-) Easy enough. > > I applied the fix to trunk, which is where this test was failing > from, right? Correct. Thanks very much -- I think tomorrow we should see a completely green board for the first time in a looooong time. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk632YUACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7EnQCggmPL/lTr/AKvZcL16Xv3Ca/N NtgAn01QCkCI4L6/kGwC5BKQIgEhhBO7 =2Kwk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0