- Zope-Dev - Zope lists

RE: [Zope-dev] tree tag _extraordinary_ namespace ugliness.
by Michel Pelletier 21 Jan '00

21 Jan '00

Good research folks, sounds to me like an extra namespace is being pushed onto itself like you conjecture. I'll talk to Jim about it and we should fix it soon. -Michel > -----Original Message----- > From: Benno Rice [mailto:benno@netizen.com.au] > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 9:27 PM > To: Anthony Baxter > Cc: zope-dev(a)zope.org; jim(a)digicool.com > Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] tree tag _extraordinary_ namespace ugliness. > > > (Sorry about sending this multiple times. I goofed.) > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 01:41:14PM +1100, Anthony Baxter wrote: > > Ok, this is making my brain hurt. > > > > Say I have something like the following: > > > > <dtml-let id="top"> > > <dtml-tree id=id branches_expr="somefunc(parent_id=id)"> > > foo foo foo. > > </dtml-tree> > > </dtml-let> > > [snip of the rest of problem desc and tentative fix.] > > Works for me. I was trying to to a <dtml-tree> within a <dtml-in> and > was seeing pretty much the same namespace weirdness. All > fixed by applying > the following diff to lib/python/TreeDisplay/TreeTag.py in > Zope 2.1.2 on > FreeBSD/i386 4.0-CURRENT. > > *** TreeTag.py.old Fri Jan 21 13:22:48 2000 > --- TreeTag.py Fri Jan 21 13:22:57 2000 > *************** > *** 238,249 **** > 'tree-colspan': colspan, > 'tree-state': state } > > - md._push(InstanceDict(self, md)) > md._push(treeData) > > try: > tpRenderTABLE(self,id,root,url,state,substate,diff,data,colspan, > section,md,treeData, level, args) > ! finally: md._pop(2) > > if state is substate and not (args.has_key('single') > and args['single']): > state=state or ([id],) > --- 238,248 ---- > 'tree-colspan': colspan, > 'tree-state': state } > > md._push(treeData) > > try: > tpRenderTABLE(self,id,root,url,state,substate,diff,data,colspan, > section,md,treeData, level, args) > ! finally: md._pop(1) > > if state is substate and not (args.has_key('single') > and args['single']): > state=state or ([id],) > > -- > Benno Rice "No, no. > We're *sweet* and > XNFP Aries Dark Subculture- *innocent* > evil bastards." > friendly Internet Geek > benno(a)netizen.com.au > "Defend your joy" > > _______________________________________________ > Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev(a)zope.org > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > (Related lists - > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) >

1 0

LICENSE.txt: license has been certified as Open Source(tm)?
by Holger Blasum 21 Jan '00

21 Jan '00

Hi, zope is exciting. Closely before becoming too enamoured, let me ask a newbie question (possibly FAQ) for clarification on this (obvious) snippet... LICENSE.txt >Zope Public License (ZPL) Version 1.0 >------------------------------------- > >Copyright (c) Digital Creations. All rights reserved. > >This license has been certified as Open Source(tm). (tm) - Uhh, well Open Source is not a trademark: "``Open Source'' is not and cannot become a trademark." Eric S. Raymond, President, President Board of Directors, OSI (OSI had previously applied for it) 16 June 1999 (http://www.opensource.org/press_releases/certified-open-source.html) But maybe this when LICENSE.txt was written in the dark ages where OSI still applied for that trademark, so perhaps it was intended to mean "certified by OSI" ? Or whom or what has been the certifier mentioned in the license (I feel not sure whether par. 5 would pass very strict criteria, but on the other hand par. 7 alleviates it) ? Again let me emphasize that I think Digital Creations is doing a really cool job; this is not necessarily political overcorrectness (but might be of some importance for the marketing guys if we go for it), just being curious, ;-) -- Holger Blasum 80336 Muenchen, Germany

2 1

how to determine if an object is put at top level?
by Ava 21 Jan '00

21 Jan '00

Hello, I want to determine if an object has been *created* either in the toplevel or lower in the hierarchy. How can I do this *reliably* ? I found this code in Zope: def isTop(self): try: return self.aq_parent.aq_base.isTopLevelPrincipiaApplicationObject except: return 0 This *doesn't* work if the object is acquired. e.g. if the object's id is my_ob in the top level: when browsing http://server/my_ob, my_ob notice that it is at top level when browsing http://server/subfolder/my_ob, my_ob *does not* notice that it is at top level with the above code. How can I make this work? My product dynamically create content based on the fact that it either at the top level or not. When the product is created, the url is http://server/manage_addProduct/myproduct, and then it is *not* at the top level from the product's point of view. However, the parameters to initialize the product are dependent on whether it is at the toplevel or not. Thanks for any input. Please write to me directly to minf7(a)educ.univ-reunion.fr (I'm not on the list) Regards, Jephte CLAIN minf7(a)educ.univ-reunion.fr

1 0

ZClasses: invalid id, but id doesn't exist
by Bill Anderson 21 Jan '00

21 Jan '00

OK, working on a new product, added a ZClass, inheriting from CatalogAware. Adding a propertysheet, no problem. Adding various properties .... all is fine until I try to add a property called 'summary'. There is no variation of it anyhwere within the product heirarchy (in fact, this is the first thing added!). I'ver even tried deleting the product and starting over. Nada. Any help greatly appreciated. Bill ANderson -- In flying I have learned that carelessness and overconfidence are usually far more dangerous than deliberately accepted risks. -- Wilbur Wright in a letter to his father, September 1900

2 2

tree tag _extraordinary_ namespace ugliness.
by Anthony Baxter 21 Jan '00

21 Jan '00

Ok, this is making my brain hurt. Say I have something like the following: <dtml-let id="top"> <dtml-tree id=id branches_expr="somefunc(parent_id=id)"> foo foo foo. </dtml-tree> </dtml-let> The 'id' the first time through will be the id of the surrounding document, _not_ the value in the 'let' tag. Looking at TreeTag.py, we can see (this is around about line 260 or 270... the line numbers in my version are way off the standard version) treeData={'tree-root-url': root, 'tree-colspan': colspan, 'tree-state': state } md._push(InstanceDict(self, md)) ## problem line md._push(treeData) try: tpRenderTABLE(self,id,root,url,state,substate,diff,data,colspan, section,md,treeData, level, args) finally: md._pop(2) (I've added '## problem line' to point out the problem.) This is pretty bogus - it screws up the namespace "stack" pretty badly. This was added in version 1.22 of TreeDisplay.py, the commit comment is revision 1.22 date: 1998/04/08 17:45:32; author: jim; state: Exp; lines: +73 -27 Major rerrangement of namespace management. Switches to short-circuit rendering. New expand, which needs to be tested. Now check security of items, and new skip_unauthorized attr. New branches_expr. I've commented out the line above, and changed the md._pop to only pop the top item. Things still work for me, and it fixes the bogosity I was seeing. Can someone explain to me what the above is supposed to be doing, and why removing it might be bad? If it's just a speedup to put stuff closer to the top of the multimapping, then it should probably die, but maybe it has some deeper purpose... I haven't submitted this to the collector, as I'm not convinced that it's actually a bug yet. Anthony

2 2

RE: [Zope-dev] Vocabulary
by Michel Pelletier 20 Jan '00

20 Jan '00

> -----Original Message----- > From: Robin Becker [mailto:robin@jessikat.demon.co.uk] > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 10:26 AM > To: zope-dev(a)zope.org > Subject: [Zope-dev] Vocabulary > > > The latest checkins seem to have inserted an import Vocaulary in to > ZCatalog which is breaking as I don't seem to have Vocabulary.py > anywhere. My bad, I'll fix it. -Michel

2 1

RE: [Zope-dev] ZCatalog.py: where is 'Vocabulary'?
by Michel Pelletier 20 Jan '00

20 Jan '00

it should be fixed now. Can you test? -Michel

1 0

RE: [Zope-dev] ZCatalog.py: where is 'Vocabulary'?
by Michel Pelletier 20 Jan '00

20 Jan '00

> -----Original Message----- > From: Anthony Baxter [mailto:anthony@interlink.com.au] > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 7:38 AM > To: zope-dev(a)zope.org > Subject: [Zope-dev] ZCatalog.py: where is 'Vocabulary'? > > > > r1.48 of ZCatalog.py in the CVS started referring to a 'Vocabulary' > module. This isn't in CVS anywhere. Michel? I got the bugfix ZCatalog.py mixed up with the partial searching ZCatalog.py. I'll fix it. -Michel

1 0

Vocabulary
by Robin Becker 20 Jan '00

20 Jan '00

The latest checkins seem to have inserted an import Vocaulary in to ZCatalog which is breaking as I don't seem to have Vocabulary.py anywhere. -- Robin Becker

1 0

ZCatalog.py: where is 'Vocabulary'?
by Anthony Baxter 20 Jan '00

20 Jan '00

r1.48 of ZCatalog.py in the CVS started referring to a 'Vocabulary' module. This isn't in CVS anywhere. Michel? Anthony

1 0