- Zope-Dev - Zope lists

zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 42
by Zope tests summarizer 30 Nov '11

30 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-28 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-29 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [1] winbot / zope.keyreference_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 [2] winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 [3] winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 [4] winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 [5] winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED winbot / zope.keyreference_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/053374.html [2] FAILED winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/053375.html [3] FAILED winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/053376.html [4] FAILED winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/053377.html [5] FAILED winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/053378.html

3 3

Re: [Zope-dev] Fwd: [Checkins] SVN: zope.app.folder/trunk/ Conform to repository policy
by Tres Seaver 30 Nov '11

30 Nov '11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/29/2011 11:48 AM, Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Zvezdan Petkovic > <zvezdan(a)zope.com> Date: 2011/2/2 Subject: Re: [Checkins] SVN: > zope.app.folder/trunk/ Conform to repository policy To: Gediminas > Paulauskas <menesis(a)pov.lt> > > > I noticed your checkins similar to this: > > On Dec 28, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: > >> Log message for revision 119203: Conform to repository policy ... >> Modified: zope.app.folder/trunk/setup.py >> =================================================================== >> --- zope.app.folder/trunk/setup.py 2010-12-28 17:10:33 UTC (rev >> 119202) +++ zope.app.folder/trunk/setup.py 2010-12-28 19:12:47 >> UTC (rev 119203) @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ >> ############################################################################## >> >> # >> -# Copyright (c) 2006 Zope Corporation and Contributors. +# >> Copyright (c) 2006 Zope Foundation and Contributors. > > > This is right. The copyright holder is the Foundation now. > > >> # All Rights Reserved. # # This software is subject to the >> provisions of the Zope Public License, @@ -21,13 +21,13 @@ def >> read(*rnames): return open(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), >> *rnames)).read() >> >> -version = '3.5.2 dev' +version = '3.5.2dev' >> >> setup(name='zope.app.folder', version=version, - author='Zope >> Corporation and Contributors', + author='Zope Foundation and >> Contributors', > > > This is NOT right. This code was written in Zope Corporation and that > does not change with the transfer of the copyright. The author is not > equal to the copyright holder. > > Please read this thread here and Christian Theune admission that he > was wrong about checking for author in his conformance scripts. > > https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2010-May/040514.html > > So, can we please stop changing authors. For the package in question here ('zope.app.folder'), ZC is in *now* way an author: 'svn log' says that the majority of people who ever checked into the package was not ZC employees at any point. That change was from one piece of boilerplate (used when ZC was the copyright holder) to another piece (after the transfer). For such a collectively-originated work, the ZF is a much better placeholder than ZC: it exists to represent the collective interests of the Zope development community. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7VSTEACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7WWACgh+S/BgX5YRxsajcvkqRrI/sq Wr0AoKFOb4DrSNZHx7Z9iCZcHvT760M4 =faMk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: zope.catalog/trunk/ Fix ZPL version in file headers
by Tres Seaver 29 Nov '11

29 Nov '11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/29/2011 11:47 AM, Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: > 2011/11/29 Tres Seaver <tseaver(a)palladion.com>: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 11/29/2011 10:39 AM, Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: >> >>> =================================================================== >>> >>> - --- zope.catalog/trunk/setup.py 2011-11-27 22:25:03 UTC (rev 123517) >>> +++ zope.catalog/trunk/setup.py 2011-11-29 15:39:53 UTC (rev >>> 123518) @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ >>> >>> setup(name = 'zope.catalog', version = '3.8.2dev', - >>> author='Zope Foundation and Contributors', + author='Zope >>> Corporation and Contributors', >>> author_email='zope-dev-CWUwpEBWKX0(a)public.gmane.org', >>> description='Cataloging and Indexing Framework for the Zope >>> Toolkit', long_description=( >> >> >> Hmm, that doesn't look right: ZC transferred all ownership of code >> to the foundation. > > I've got mails from people in Zope Corporation where they complained > that author is changed without reason. Copyright is transferred to > Foundation, but author is still the Corporation. Since there was no > release with changed author, I reverted this change. "Zope Corp." didn't write the code for either zope.catalog or zope.app.catalog (from which it was drawn): all that code is written by individuals, many of whom were not employees of ZC at the time. If there *is* a single (primary) author, then listing that *person* as author is fine, but otherwise the Foundation works better than ZC as a "collective author". Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7VFC4ACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ6jOwCfaXPIkmDhLA1LRRk6/QQ651zl 5oIAoMiPk7suvs9iM1K8Lk9zePOuHITU =4Osf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: zope.catalog/trunk/ Fix ZPL version in file headers
by Tres Seaver 29 Nov '11

29 Nov '11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/29/2011 10:39 AM, Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: > =================================================================== > --- zope.catalog/trunk/setup.py 2011-11-27 22:25:03 UTC (rev 123517) > +++ zope.catalog/trunk/setup.py 2011-11-29 15:39:53 UTC (rev 123518) > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ > > setup(name = 'zope.catalog', version = '3.8.2dev', - author='Zope > Foundation and Contributors', + author='Zope Corporation and > Contributors', author_email='zope-dev(a)zope.org', > description='Cataloging and Indexing Framework for the Zope Toolkit', > long_description=( Hmm, that doesn't look right: ZC transferred all ownership of code to the foundation. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7VAAwACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4BDgCgzfOYy018Zmzh8lztNyrKcBvn Yb8Ani8tjtOOX83aJTZS8HIEvY1ekRxK =o2pe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

zope-tests - OK: 46
by Zope tests summarizer 29 Nov '11

29 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-27 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-28 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results --------------

1 0

Mailing lists moved
by Jens Vagelpohl 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Hi all, I moved all mailing lists to a newer server this weekend. If anyone is noticing any problems please talk to me off-list. jens

1 0

zope-tests - FAILED: 4, OK: 46
by Zope tests summarizer 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-26 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-27 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux [1] Total languishing bugs for zope2: 5 [2] Total languishing bugs for zope: 71 [3] Total languishing bugs for zopeapp: 1 [4] Total languishing bugs for zopetoolkit: 205 ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED Total languishing bugs for zope2: 5 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/053257.html [2] FAILED Total languishing bugs for zope: 71 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/053256.html [3] FAILED Total languishing bugs for zopeapp: 1 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/053251.html [4] FAILED Total languishing bugs for zopetoolkit: 205 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/053255.html

1 0

zope-tests - OK: 46
by Zope tests summarizer 27 Nov '11

27 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-25 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-26 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results --------------

1 0

zope-tests - OK: 46
by Zope tests summarizer 26 Nov '11

26 Nov '11

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-24 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-25 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results --------------

1 0

"server accept() threw an exception" in log
by Malthe Borch 25 Nov '11

25 Nov '11

I had many of these in the instance log; googling around, I found this: https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/2002-September/122392.html But it seems the patch attached to a post in that thread never made it to the repo. It's now almost ten years later, so this sort of incident must be pretty rare. The question remains, should the patched be applied? \malthe

2 1