- Zope-Dev - Zope lists

Handling instance specific configuration files with buildout
by Charlie Clark 18 Nov '09

18 Nov '09

Hi, thanks to Hanno's help I'm up and running with buildout. Having spent the last couple of years tied to to some frozen Zope and CMF checkouts it's quite refreshing to be able to try newer components with our own. :-) There is, however, one thing I haven't quite worked out how to do is add stuff to the instance's "etc" folder. We have some configuration files which are instance specific which we have so far kept in in etc/config. Do I need to create a recipe that does this for this part? Charlie -- Charlie Clark Managing Director Clark Consulting & Research German Office Helmholtzstr. 20 Düsseldorf D- 40215 Tel: +49-211-600-3657 Mobile: +49-178-782-6226

3 6

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 18 Nov '09

18 Nov '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Nov 17 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Nov 18 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Nov 17 20:39:48 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013035.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Nov 17 20:41:48 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013036.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Nov 17 20:43:48 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013037.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Nov 17 20:45:49 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013038.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Nov 17 20:47:49 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013039.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Nov 17 20:49:49 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013040.html

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] Setuptools / Distribute
by Charlie Clark 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

Am 17.11.2009, 16:35 Uhr, schrieb Attila Oláh <attilaolah(a)gmail.com>: > One minor note, if you use the new bootstrap.py provided by distribute > ( http://python-distribute.org/bootstrap.py ), and you try to > bootstrap a project where the system-wide setuptools is older (on many > systems it's still 0.6c9), it will fail, asking you to upgrade to > 0.6c11, which will force you to bootstrap inside a virtualenv (which > is silly) in case you don't have access to upgrade the system-wide > setuptools. Although this behavior might have changed in the last > week, the distribute folks are doing a real good job. I was using the most recent versions from MacPorts: fuchsia:trunk charlieclark$ port info py26-pip py26-pip @0.6 (python, www) Description: pip is a replacement for easy_install. It uses mostly the same techniques for finding packages, so packages that were made easy_installable should be pip-installable as well. Homepage: http://pip.openplans.org/ Library Dependencies: python26, py26-setuptools Platforms: darwin License: unknown Maintainers: arthurk(a)macports.org, openmaintainer(a)macports.org fuchsia:trunk charlieclark$ port info py26-distribute py26-distribute @0.6.8 (python, devel) Description: Distribute is a fork of the Setuptools project. It is intended to replace Setuptools as the standard method for working with Python module distributions. Homepage: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/distribute/ Library Dependencies: python26 Conflicts with: py26-setuptools Platforms: darwin License: unknown Maintainers: nomaintainer(a)macports.org I had to deinstall distribute. Charlie -- Charlie Clark Managing Director Clark Consulting & Research German Office Helmholtzstr. 20 Düsseldorf D- 40215 Tel: +49-211-600-3657 Mobile: +49-178-782-6226

1 0

Setuptools / Distribute
by Charlie Clark 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

Hi, I'm about to migrate my first Zope to project to buildout. Does it matter whether I use setuptools or distribute? And is there any preference for one over the other? Charlie -- Charlie Clark Managing Director Clark Consulting & Research German Office Helmholtzstr. 20 Düsseldorf D- 40215 Tel: +49-211-600-3657 Mobile: +49-178-782-6226

2 2

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Nov 16 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Nov 17 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Nov 16 20:39:53 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013029.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Nov 16 20:41:53 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013030.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Nov 16 20:43:53 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013031.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Nov 16 20:45:53 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013032.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Nov 16 20:47:53 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013033.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Nov 16 20:49:53 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013034.html

1 0

Contributing initgroups upstream
by exarkun＠twistedmatrix.com 16 Nov '09

16 Nov '09

Hi, I've just contributed a patch to CPython adding os.initgroups based on this extension module: http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/src/initgroups/ The CPython ticket is here: http://bugs.python.org/issue7333 I don't think there should be any licensing issues, as the ZPL is pretty permissive and the code is very short. However, if there are, could the code in question be relicensed for CPython under the Python license? Thanks, Jean-Paul

5 6

Merging the zope.component's conditional support for zope.security
by Fabio Tranchitella 16 Nov '09

16 Nov '09

Hello, I'd like to finally merge my branch which adds conditional support for zope.security, removing the hard dependency between zope.component[zcml] and zope.security. The branch also contains the hook's branch Thomas discussed on the list, and it is available here: svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope.component/branches/conditional-zope.secu… The only package in the ZTK failing tests with this branch is zope.sendmail (it is importing PublicPermission from zope.component.zcml); I will fix it after merging into the trunk. Does anybody has objections? Thanks, Fabio

3 7

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 16 Nov '09

16 Nov '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Nov 15 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Nov 16 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Nov 15 21:03:31 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013023.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Nov 15 21:05:31 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013024.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Nov 15 21:07:31 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013025.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Nov 15 21:09:36 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013026.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Nov 15 21:11:36 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013027.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Nov 15 21:13:42 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013028.html

1 0

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 15 Nov '09

15 Nov '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Nov 14 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Nov 15 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Nov 14 20:39:14 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013017.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Nov 14 20:41:14 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013018.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Nov 14 20:43:14 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013019.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Nov 14 20:45:14 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013020.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Nov 14 20:47:14 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013021.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Nov 14 20:49:14 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013022.html

1 0

Vote on PyPI comments
by Chris Withers 13 Nov '09

13 Nov '09

Hi All, Apologies for the cross post, but I'm not sure this has received the publicity it deserves... PyPI grew a commenting and rating system a while back, apparently in response to requests from users. However, since it's been rolled out, there's been a backlash from package maintainers who already have mailing lists, bug trackers, etc for their packages and don't want to have to try and keep track of yet another support forum. The arguments for and against are listed here: http://wiki.python.org/moin/PyPIComments To resolve the future of the commenting and rating system, a vote has been set up so everyone can have their say. To vote, please log in to: http://pypi.python.org/pypi ...and follow the instructions you'll be presented with. I would like to remain neutral on this, and for me that means giving package authors the ability to choose whether they want to receive comments, ratings or neither rather than either forcing package authors to accept comments and ratings or abandoning the idea of comments and ratings completely. The closest option to that is: "Allow package owners to disallow comments (ratings unmodified)" I hope the majority of you feel the same way... Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

1 0