- Zope-Dev - Zope lists

Re: [Zope-dev] Future of ZClasses
by Lennart Regebro 09 Oct '06

09 Oct '06

On 9/27/06, Andreas Jung <lists(a)zopyx.com> wrote: > It's definitely time to work on a replacement. Yes. And here is my short vision of that. Comments are appreciated. 1. We have a base content class used to create content objects. This has the concept of type, pretty much like CMFs portal_type. The type is defined in the ZODB. 2. On the type you can set marker interfaces, that enables adapters with different functionality, such as indexing awareness, and whatnot. These adapters are written in diskbased pythons. Hence any type of basic functionality like this still needs to be disk-based. 3. Each type also has schemas and forms, templates and python scripts in the ZODB. The schemas and forms are to generate edit and create forms, the python scripts act like methods on a view, and the templates as, well, templates. 4. When you then run into a thing you can't do through the web you are not stuck. If you want to add new event handler for your type, you can write a new functionality adapter on disk, and then enable it via marker interfces for your type. If you python scripts security becomes a hindrance, you can easily move that to disk by making another marker interface and building views for that. We could even have a button "Export to disk module" which exports the current templates + scripts to a view + methods + templates all on disk. This combines and easy plug-and-play attitude with TTW programming without providing a dead end. -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/

4 17

Maintainer of Zope 2 Windows builds?
by Andreas Jung 09 Oct '06

09 Oct '06

Who is currently in charge or who feels responsible for the Windows builds? Andreas

4 4

buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin2
by buildbot＠zope.com 08 Oct '06

08 Oct '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin2. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 8060 Blamelist: andreasjung,baijum,flox BUILD FAILED: failed compile sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
by buildbot＠zope.com 08 Oct '06

08 Oct '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 8061 Blamelist: andreasjung,baijum,flox,jim BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
by buildbot＠zope.com 08 Oct '06

08 Oct '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 8060 Blamelist: andreasjung,baijum,flox BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
by buildbot＠zope.com 08 Oct '06

08 Oct '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 8056 Blamelist: alga,andreasjung,baijum,faassen,fdrake,flox,jim,schwendinger,shh,tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin2
by buildbot＠zope.com 08 Oct '06

08 Oct '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin2. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 8055 Blamelist: alga,andreasjung,baijum,faassen,fdrake,flox,jim,jukart,schwendinger,shh,tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed compile sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
by buildbot＠zope.com 08 Oct '06

08 Oct '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 8055 Blamelist: alga,andreasjung,baijum,faassen,fdrake,flox,jim,jukart,schwendinger,shh,tseaver BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

I Like ZClasses as a separate product, I like Democracy Better
by Christopher Lozinski 07 Oct '06

07 Oct '06

I do like the idea of ZClasses as a separate product. Actually I think all of Zope should be an assembly of separate products. I would love to see multiple flavors of Zope each as an assembly of separate products. If we make ZClasses a separate product, does that mean we can get our own mailing list for ZClasses. Maybe a separate web site, wiki, etc? Maybe the 4 or 5 companies who care about ZClasses can get together and fund the upgrade. I am still not sure if the next version of my application will be in Zope 3 or not, but if it is, I see it as a completely separate code base. Accordingly, this rapid evolution of Zope, to make it compatible with Zope 3 drives a lot of us nuts. We would prefer to just see a stable Zope 2, and an incompatible Zope 3. But I get no say in the matter. Open source is good, democratic source would be better. I am not trying to upset people with this email message. I just want to present a different point of view. Chris

4 3

buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
by buildbot＠zope.com 07 Oct '06

07 Oct '06

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 8051 Blamelist: andreasjung BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0