- Zope-Dev - Zope lists

CatalogBrains since Zope2.7.1b1
by Eric Brun 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

Hi, I have a problem with 'getObject' method of CatalogBrains class on Zope271b1 : it's return None. But with a Zope2.7.0 my object is correctly find and returned. The permissions are right. is there any bug here ? Thanks Eric Brun Ingénieur de développement eric.brun(a)pentila.com Pentila Bâtiment Euclide 73370 Le Bourget du Lac Savoie Technolac http://www.pentila.com

6 6

Email marketing
by bn＠hotmail.com 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

1 0

Zope Collector issue #1384
by Simon Eisenmann 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I just submitted issue #1384 to zope.org's collector but got this error message: Email notice error: '(110, 'Connection timed out')' Therefore i send the note of this collector issue to the dev list. See the issue at: http://zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1384 Cheers, ~ Simon *** snip *** len(LazyCat) doesnt work when tried to read more elements as in the LazyCat before: ~From time to time we had some problems with doing Zcatalog based OR searches. To do this we simply add one catalog result to the other. An addition of LazyMap's produces a LazyCat object. In some conditions our application raised "AttributeError: LazyCat instance has no attribute '_seq'". Today i looked into this in detail and found the problem in the LazyCat implementation. So the problem is that when you iterate over more LazyCat list elements that there are actually in the list an IndexError is raised. This is fine of course. But afterwards you are no longer able to get the length of this LazyCat, because the error above is raised. You need to read the length of a LazyCat _before_ you have code which probably could raise an IndexError of this list. To test this behavior use the following script on a ZCatalog: """ catalog = context.portal_catalog res1 = catalog(SearchableText="admin") res2 = catalog(SearchableText="icoya") res = res1 + res2 for x in range(6): ~ try: print "x", x, res[x] ~ except: pass print "len", len(res) return printed """ In this case the real length of the res LazyCat is 5 .. so i iterate to 6 which raises an IndexError. Afterwards it's no longer possible to retrieve the length of this (now borked) LazyCat. If i had read the length before the iteration, all works perfectly, since the implementation "remembers" the len if it was computed once. So if this is to be fixed then the implementation of the LazyCat length method has to be changed slightly to check for the missing _seq attribute and then use the self._data for length retrieval. *** snip *** - -- Simon Eisenmann [ mailto:simon@struktur.de ] [ struktur AG | Junghansstraße 5 | 70469 Stuttgart ] [ T. +49.711.896656.68 | F.+49.711.89665610 ] [ http://www.struktur.de | mailto:info@struktur.de ] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFA2+yqcKXkdvrBGTARAnZYAKCinwA7HLamr0ZTzVQNgi8oCpkh+QCeK31k zqaOTHEqiUN9D8hYxgq4AwM= =kEId -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Undeliverable Mail
by Postmaster 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

Requested action not taken: virus detected Original message follows. Message-ID: <1SomeRandomStuffGoesHere(a)orotech.net> From: zope-dev(a)zope.org To: <postmaster(a)orotech.net> Subject: SPAM: something for you Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 06:51:22 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="SomeRandomStuffGoesHere" X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 212.54.103.34 with no reverse DNS entry. X-Declude-Sender: zope-dev(a)zope.org [212.54.103.34] X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for spam. X-Spam-Tests-Failed: REVDNS, SPAMHEADERS, WEIGHT10 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --SomeRandomStuffGoesHere Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You have spam! Subject: something for you From: zope-dev(a)zope.org Tests Failed: REVDNS, SPAMHEADERS, WEIGHT10 To view the E-mail, just click the attachment. --SomeRandomStuffGoesHere Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="spam.eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="spam.eml" Received: from orotech.net [212.54.103.34] by orotech.net (SMTPD32-8.12) id AB35B3D00CA; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 02:50:29 -0400 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web (http://www.drweb.net) From: zope-dev(a)zope.org To: postmaster(a)orotech.net Subject: something for you Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:49:37 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="00380126" Message-Id: <200406250250468.SM01504(a)orotech.net> --00380126 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit that is bad --00380126 --00380126-- --SomeRandomStuffGoesHere--

1 0

A Virus was Detected in a document you sent.
by donotreply＠onyxes.com 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

If you did not send a message to onyxes.com you were probably the victim of e-mail spoofing. Email spoofing Mass-mailing worms often use a technique called "spoofing." When a mass-mailing worm performs its email routine, it randomly selects an email address from somewhere on the infected computer. It then uses that random email address in the From field, and emails an infected email to other email addresses it finds on the infected computer. There have been many cases reported where users of computers receive complaints that they sent an infected message to someone. Because the mass-mailing worm does not use the email address of the infected computer in the email it sends, there is no way to know where the infected email came from. (Symantec Anti-Virus Research Center website) We recommend that you check your computer for virus. Below is the information: The infected component in the scanned document was deleted. Violation Information: The attachment message.pif contained the virus W32.Netsky.P@mm and was deleted. The filename extension of attachment message.pif violated the content filtering rule Delete Attachment and was deleted.

1 0

(no subject)
by 真的 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

1 0

(no subject)
by 免费 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

1 0

(no subject)
by 快看 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

1 0

RE: [Zope.Com Geeks] Re: [Zope-dev] zope-dev list policies
by Tim Peters 24 Jun '04

24 Jun '04

[Ken Manheimer] > I noticed this when it went initially went by, but didn't have time to > follow up. The upshot is that there is absolutely no way *under the > current arrangement* that this is going to happen. I can see a way to > swing it, requiring earnest volunteer effort. Here are the details. I think you have something different in mind than was being discussed. "Members only" comes in several flavors. You seem to have the "... and non-member posts are held for moderator review" flavor in mind. That wasn't suggested. Two other flavors were: - "... and non-member posts are rejected". No messages are held for moderator review then. A would-be poster with a legitimate email address gets an auto-generated rejection reply msg. Since most rejection msgs would go to bogus addresses on spam and virus email, m.z.o gets another bounce back for most attempts to send a rejection reply. - "... and non-member posts are discarded". No messages are held for moderator review then. Non-member posts go to the bit bucket, without comment or recourse. > Being the administrator of many of the zope lists (probably over ten and > below twenty), i am already dismayed by the challenge of the typically > thirty to one hundred held spam messages, bounces, and other effluvia i > have to handle *per day*. I do not know how many of the legitimate list > messages would additionally be held and require more attention (with the > current mailman implementation, it takes a lot more fuss to approve a > held message than to discard it), but the load is already untenable, so > one more is too many. > > There is an option, however. It's possible to add moderators to lists, > separate from list administration privileges. I would be willing to set > the lists to hold non-member postings, *if* there were volunteer > moderators that would actually take care of some significant portion of > the load - ie, i would not have to approve one non-member (alternate > address) posting. (I would not mind occasionally approving a > non-member/alt-addr posting if the volunteers reduced the spam/bounce > handling efforts in the process.) In my (limited but real <wink>) experience, this doesn't work. Without a single clear owner, postings held for review eventually grow to unmanageable bulk. Nobody enjoys the moderation task, it does consume time, and when there are multiple moderators they all eventually reach a point of believing that "someone else" can handle it for a while. After a few days go by like that, a co-moderator who is able to make some time logs in and finds such a backlog that they decide they have more urgent work to attend to. Then it snowballs out of control. We had a clear example of this about a month ago, when the backlog of python-help messages waiting for review reached thousands. At that point the only realistic option was to discard all of them, effectively making python-help the "... and non-member posts are discarded" list flavor. The only "... and non-member posts are held for review" list I moderate that works is the PSF Board mailing list. That works because I'm the only moderator, legit traffic on it is very light, and I know enough Visual Basic to automate the reject/approve process without leaving Outlook <wink>. > ... > That's the situation. Are there people that would be willing to > volunteer for moderation duties? (Say which lists when you reply - and > make sure to cc me directly, since i can't read most of the lists i > moderate.) The rub is that mailing lists are open 24 hours per day, 365.2425 days per year, and virus/spam traffic keeps increasing. Good intentions get crushed by that reality.

3 3

BP server
by Bill 24 Jun '04

24 Jun '04

1 0