October 2008 - Zope-Dev

acquisition of REQUEST?
by Jürgen Herrmann 30 Oct '08

30 Oct '08

hi there! i'm searching for the code where acquisition of "aPersistent.REQUEST" is handled in zope 2.10? can someone please point me in the right direction here? i searched the code for 2 hours now and can't find it... thanks in advance and best regards, jürgen herrmann

2 1

Zope Tests: 4 OK, 1 Failed, 1 Unknown
by Zope Tests Summarizer 30 Oct '08

30 Oct '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Oct 29 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Thu Oct 30 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=3) : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Oct 30 03:18:23 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010393.html Unknown ------- Subject: UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Oct 30 03:16:53 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010392.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Oct 30 03:10:52 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010388.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Oct 30 03:12:22 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010389.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Oct 30 03:13:52 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010390.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Oct 30 03:15:22 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010391.html

1 0

problem with using webDAV between MS Word and Zope
by Wayne Glover 29 Oct '08

29 Oct '08

hi all, i am using plone 3+ with zope ope-2.10.5-final I am trying to use webDAV between Word and Zope. This works fine for OO (yes i know - don't use Word! Not an option) I have searched far and wide and have found the 'solution' at (https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/143725) however, i can't get it to work for me with this installation _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ The changes suggested by the bug fix at the link are as follows: *** /usr/local/zope-2.8.4/lib/python/webdav/Resource.py 2006-06-13 16:35:29.000000000 -0500 --- /usr/local/zope-2.8.4/lib/python/webdav/Resource.py.orig 2006-06-13 16:20:17.000000000 -0500 *************** *** 197,203 **** self.dav__init(REQUEST, RESPONSE) RESPONSE.setHeader('Allow', ', '.join(self.__http_methods__)) RESPONSE.setHeader('Content-Length', 0) - RESPONSE.setHeader('MS-Author-Via', 'DAV') RESPONSE.setHeader('DAV', '1,2', 1) RESPONSE.setStatus(200) return RESPONSE --- 197,202 ---- *************** *** 594,606 **** def manage_DAVget(self): """Gets the document source""" # The default implementation calls manage_FTPget ! # some things have manage_FTPget's that take REQUEST and RESPONSE ! # -- mengel 2006-06-13 ! try: ! res = self.manage_FTPget() ! except: ! self.manage_FTPget({},{}) ! return res def listDAVObjects(self): return [] --- 593,599 ---- def manage_DAVget(self): """Gets the document source""" # The default implementation calls manage_FTPget ! return self.manage_FTPget() def listDAVObjects(self): return [] _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Note that what it is doing is forcing a response of 'MS-Author-Via', 'DAV') what this is supposed to do is force Word to accept webDAV vs. it's only silly thing. good in theory, but i couldn't get it to work After revising the file on the zope server, i then tried Word webDAV. I monitored the network traffic to look for the OPTIONS response telling Word to use webDAV. see attached txt file which has tcp stream while i tried to save .doc file. Note that, in the above change, the "RESPONSE.setHeader ('MS-Author-Via', 'DAV') is supposed to be returned by Zope to force Word to work with webDAV, but this does not happen. This has been driving me crazy and any help would be greatly appreciated. Note: i have attached the zope 'resource.py' as i have modified it based on the above link. plz let me know if you can see what is wrong. Thanks, Wayne Glover TechnicalMedia, Inc.

2 1

Zope Tests: 4 OK, 2 Unknown
by Zope Tests Summarizer 29 Oct '08

29 Oct '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Oct 28 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Wed Oct 29 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Unknown ------- Subject: UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Oct 29 04:24:18 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010386.html Subject: UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Oct 29 04:25:48 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010387.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Oct 29 04:18:16 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010382.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Oct 29 04:19:48 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010383.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Oct 29 04:21:18 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010384.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Oct 29 04:22:48 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010385.html

1 0

Zope Tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 28 Oct '08

28 Oct '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Oct 27 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Tue Oct 28 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=3) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Oct 27 22:12:19 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010380.html Subject: FAILED (failures=3) : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Oct 27 22:13:49 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010381.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Oct 27 22:06:18 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010376.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Oct 27 22:07:48 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010377.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Oct 27 22:09:18 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010378.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Oct 27 22:10:48 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010379.html

1 0

Zope Tests: 4 OK, 1 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 27 Oct '08

27 Oct '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Oct 26 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Mon Oct 27 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=3, errors=4) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 26 22:03:25 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010375.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 26 21:57:24 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010371.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 26 21:58:54 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010372.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 26 22:00:25 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010373.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 26 22:01:55 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010374.html

2 2

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/AccessControl/tests/actual_python.py 'any' and 'all' are not builtins in Python 2.4.
by Tres Seaver 27 Oct '08

27 Oct '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: > Is this a typo? Yes, thanks for the catch. > On Oct 27, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: > >> def f13(): >> - assert any([True, True, True]) == True >> - assert any([True, False, True]) == True >> - assert any([False, False, False]) == False >> + try: >> + all > > I thinks this should be "any" instead of "all". > >> + except NameError: >> + pass # Python < 2.5 >> + else: >> + assert any([True, True, True]) == True >> + assert any([True, False, True]) == True >> + assert any([False, False, False]) == False >> f13() > > Arguably, if there's an "all", there will be "any", so it will work > the same, but looks a little strange to try for "all" and then use > "any" in assertion. > > Best regards, > > Zvezdan > - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJBh4o+gerLs4ltQ4RAtGGAJ45034n4Wyzc0ZjTHC2WMlA8p8auwCfWKhw BN0IJVXPJKAoJmPgj8Q4/Vw= =08ye -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/zope/ - Revert to an older zope.testing. New one is way too new
by Tres Seaver 27 Oct '08

27 Oct '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sidnei da Silva wrote: > Log message for revision 92597: > - Revert to an older zope.testing. New one is way too new Before: > testing svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope.testing/tags/3.5.3/src/zope/testing After: > testing svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope.testing/tags/3.5.6/src/zope/testing Unless I'm seeing things, this is a bump to a newer version. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJBI4t+gerLs4ltQ4RAp5GAJwKox2PLxkNr7RNzq1BLFCWCH6cXACdEJJu GBp7u0bYrOsFTbcE+Fze1Gs= =qccz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Proposal: Make Zope2 smaller
by Hanno Schlichting 26 Oct '08

26 Oct '08

Hi. I'd like to get feedback on an idea I had recently. Problem Zope2 currently includes large parts of Zope 3. Not all of the zope.* and zope.app.* packages are maintained or are in use. Still Zope 2 includes large amounts of them and thus implicitly advertises them to be used. In addition they blow up the installed code size and add a long term maintenance burden. The move to gain Python 2.6 compatibility has shown some of this and I expect to see more work in moving to Python 3 at a later stage. Assumption Zope 2.12 will most probably see two kind of distributions. One is a Zope2 egg, consisting of one large Zope2 egg which pulls in everything that has been eggified on their own as dependencies. This includes the ZODB and all zope.* and zope.app.* packages. The second distribution is a tradtional tarball, which exactly matches the current distribution format. Proposal I'd like to change the egg distribution alone and introduce one setuptools extra to it. The old tarball distribution would stay the same. The standard Zope2 egg install would only include those zope.* and zope.app.* packages which it actually requires. The extra would be called 'zope_app' and pull in all zope.* and zope.app.* packages which we did include so far, but are not actually required to run Zope 2. For example: extras_require = dict( zope_app = [ 'zope.app.rotterdam', 'zope.app.<...>', ], ), Rational Any package that does require any of the zope.* or zope.app.* packages can define those as an explicit dependency itself. The zope_app extra makes the transition phase easier, in which packages do not yet declare all their dependencies. In the long run, the extra can be dropped entirely. This proposal makes it possible to get a smaller, well-defined Zope2 egg. The first egg release of Zope2 gives us an opportunity to do this move without breaking backwards compatibility. While Zope 2 has included large parts of Zope 3, it never exactly included all of it. As Zope 3 is not likely to see an ongoing monolithic release, I don't see a reason for Zope 2 to include Zope 3 in the monolithic fashion we do so far. Implementation This is not yet implemented but should be quite easy. Figuring out the exact packages which are required by Zope 2 is to be done. Questions / Comments / Feedback Are more than welcome. Hanno

4 3

New zope.interface release
by Hanno Schlichting 26 Oct '08

26 Oct '08

Hi, I just released a new zope.interface 3.5.0 to be found at http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.interface I uploaded a zipped source distribution and (as we have C extensions) Windows installers for Python 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6. Please contact me, if you find problems with it. Hanno

1 1