November 2009 - Zope-Dev

Merging the zope.component's conditional support for zope.security
by Fabio Tranchitella 16 Nov '09

16 Nov '09

Hello, I'd like to finally merge my branch which adds conditional support for zope.security, removing the hard dependency between zope.component[zcml] and zope.security. The branch also contains the hook's branch Thomas discussed on the list, and it is available here: svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope.component/branches/conditional-zope.secu… The only package in the ZTK failing tests with this branch is zope.sendmail (it is importing PublicPermission from zope.component.zcml); I will fix it after merging into the trunk. Does anybody has objections? Thanks, Fabio

3 7

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 16 Nov '09

16 Nov '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Nov 15 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Nov 16 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Nov 15 21:03:31 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013023.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Nov 15 21:05:31 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013024.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Nov 15 21:07:31 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013025.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Nov 15 21:09:36 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013026.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Nov 15 21:11:36 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013027.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Nov 15 21:13:42 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013028.html

1 0

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 15 Nov '09

15 Nov '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Nov 14 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Nov 15 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Nov 14 20:39:14 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013017.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Nov 14 20:41:14 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013018.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Nov 14 20:43:14 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013019.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Nov 14 20:45:14 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013020.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Nov 14 20:47:14 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013021.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Nov 14 20:49:14 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013022.html

1 0

Vote on PyPI comments
by Chris Withers 13 Nov '09

13 Nov '09

Hi All, Apologies for the cross post, but I'm not sure this has received the publicity it deserves... PyPI grew a commenting and rating system a while back, apparently in response to requests from users. However, since it's been rolled out, there's been a backlash from package maintainers who already have mailing lists, bug trackers, etc for their packages and don't want to have to try and keep track of yet another support forum. The arguments for and against are listed here: http://wiki.python.org/moin/PyPIComments To resolve the future of the commenting and rating system, a vote has been set up so everyone can have their say. To vote, please log in to: http://pypi.python.org/pypi ...and follow the instructions you'll be presented with. I would like to remain neutral on this, and for me that means giving package authors the ability to choose whether they want to receive comments, ratings or neither rather than either forcing package authors to accept comments and ratings or abandoning the idea of comments and ratings completely. The closest option to that is: "Allow package owners to disallow comments (ratings unmodified)" I hope the majority of you feel the same way... Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

1 0

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 13 Nov '09

13 Nov '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Nov 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Nov 13 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Nov 12 20:38:56 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013005.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Nov 12 20:40:56 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013006.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Nov 12 20:42:56 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013007.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Nov 12 20:44:56 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013008.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Nov 12 20:46:56 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013009.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Nov 12 20:48:56 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013010.html

1 0

Zope 2.12 - one more ZPublisher event
by Martin Aspeli 12 Nov '09

12 Nov '09

Hi, In Zope 2.12 ZPublisher we have a good set of events now, which provide useful hooks for modifying the response before or after publication. However, I'd like to add one more. ;-) Basically, we have IPubFailure, but this is sent *after* transaction.abort() and endInteraction(). This means that it's impossible to read from the ZODB when trying to deal with a failure. I'd like to add an event before that, IPubBeforeAbort, which mirrors IPubBeforeCommit in being sent before the transaction is aborted. I can do this on Zope trunk + 2.12 branch if no-one objects. Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book

2 3

Zope Tests: 6 OK, 1 Unknown
by Zope Tests Summarizer 12 Nov '09

12 Nov '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Nov 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Nov 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 1 from Carlos.Solis, 6 from Zope Tests. Unknown ------- Subject: Automated Acceptance Test From: Carlos.Solis Date: Wed Nov 11 12:37:04 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/012998.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Nov 11 20:39:01 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/012999.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Nov 11 20:41:01 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013000.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Nov 11 20:43:01 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013001.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Nov 11 20:45:01 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013002.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Nov 11 20:47:01 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013003.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Nov 11 20:49:01 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/013004.html

1 0

Automated Acceptance Test
by Stefan H. Holek 11 Nov '09

11 Nov '09

You may have more luck on zope-dev (cc'd). :-) Stefan On 11.11.2009, at 18:37, Carlos.Solis wrote: > Dear all, > > > > I’m trying to find an open source project that in the current > version uses automated acceptance tests, but that in previous > versions it did not. I think that this is the case between Zope 3 > and Zope 2, but I’m not sure. I would like to know if > Zope.testbrowser was used for automated acceptance test in the > creation of Zope 3. In addition, I would like to know if this was > included in the evolution of Zope 2 that use Zope 3 technology. > > > > Best regards > > Carlos Solis > -- Stefan H. Holek stefan(a)epy.co.at

1 0

Zope Tests: 6 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 11 Nov '09

11 Nov '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Nov 10 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Nov 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Nov 10 20:38:35 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/012992.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Nov 10 20:40:35 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/012993.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Nov 10 20:42:35 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/012994.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Nov 10 20:44:35 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/012995.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Nov 10 20:46:35 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/012996.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.2 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Nov 10 20:48:35 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-November/012997.html

1 0

Packing and GC versus packtime
by Christian Theune 10 Nov '09

10 Nov '09

Hi, I'm wondering: Scenario 1: I pack a storage to a time T and append X transactions after that Scenario 2: I append X transactions to a storage and then pack it to time T. Will those scenarios end up with the same result? I can imagine GC to get in the way, but I'm not sure about how it does its thing exactly. The question can also be phrased as: Are the operations "pack" and "append transaction" for storages commutative? Christian -- Christian Theune · ct(a)gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development

4 5