April 2009 - Zope-Dev

zdaemon is alpha?
by Chris Withers 09 Apr '09

09 Apr '09

Hey All, http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zdaemon indicates that zdaemon is alpha. I would have though it would be marked as stable, given how long its been around? Is there a reason for that? If not, I'll change it on trunk... Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

4 5

Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 09 Apr '09

09 Apr '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Apr 8 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Apr 9 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 8 21:02:08 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011426.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 8 20:47:52 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011419.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 8 20:49:56 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011420.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 8 20:51:57 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011421.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 8 20:53:58 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011422.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 8 20:55:59 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011423.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 8 20:57:59 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011424.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 8 21:00:00 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011425.html

3 2

running all Zope 2 tests on trunk?
by Chris Withers 09 Apr '09

09 Apr '09

Hey All, Is this buildout sufficient to run all the Zope 2 tests on trunk: [buildout] parts = test extends = http://svn.zope.org/*checkout*/Zope/tags/2.12.0a1/versions-zope2.cfg develop = Zope # Zope is a checkout of: # svn+ssh://chrisw@svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/trunk [test] recipe = zc.recipe.testrunner eggs = Zope2 cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

1 0

Announcing: Zope 4.0 project
by Tres Seaver 08 Apr '09

08 Apr '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On behalf of the Zope community, I am pleased to announce the creation of the "Zope 4.0" project. After extensive discussion with the Zope wizards in conclave at PyCon 2009, the new project's website has been launched: http://zopefour.org/ Enjoy! Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJ01VR+gerLs4ltQ4RAiljAKCACB9aMtI3YnsXPZss4hdEDrA7FACgsqv7 3jR6FQeEy0qpX4D4NOX+HsA= =q8Fu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

8 35

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...
by Chris Withers 08 Apr '09

08 Apr '09

Gary Poster wrote: > > Within the constraints above, then, in line with your original proposal, > I think we'd be fine with "Zope Framework," and "Zope 2." We certainly > don't need Zope-3-the-tarball, if that's what you meant. Zope Framework (and maybe even ZF4) seems to have general agreement. "Zope 2" can't stay as is, because people stick in in the chain of: Zope 1, Zope 2, Zope 3, Zope Framework 4 ...so there will be confusion. "Zope Standard 4.0" is my current choice, on the basis that I've not heard any complaints against it yet and I know Andreas hates Zope Classic ;-) > As a related aside, I personally think that Plone should be featured here. Indeed. ZF4 as the base for ZS, Plone, Grok and Repoze works for me :-) Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

2 2

Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 08 Apr '09

08 Apr '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Apr 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Apr 8 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Apr 7 20:58:56 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011418.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Apr 7 20:44:48 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011411.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Apr 7 20:46:50 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011412.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Apr 7 20:48:51 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011413.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Apr 7 20:50:51 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011414.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Apr 7 20:52:53 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011415.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Apr 7 20:54:53 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011416.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Apr 7 20:56:54 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011417.html

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: zope.fixers/trunk/zope/fixers/ Added a fixer for implementsOnly. Currently the decorator is called implementer_only. I'm not happy with
by Tres Seaver 07 Apr '09

07 Apr '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lennart Regebro wrote: > Log message for revision 98979: > Added a fixer for implementsOnly. Currently the decorator is called implementer_only. I'm not happy with > that name, but we can easily change it until we make a first release of a Python 3 compatible > zope.interface. Maybe something like 'soleImplementor'? Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJ2472+gerLs4ltQ4RAp1sAKClR2lMxuNJQEqkWLd8/SM8/NEELACeNRai C1Wwd3am7kKNGUTwvp5aaVI= =TO6+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 07 Apr '09

07 Apr '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Apr 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Apr 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Apr 6 21:02:44 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011410.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Apr 6 20:48:34 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011403.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Apr 6 20:50:35 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011404.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Apr 6 20:52:38 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011405.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Apr 6 20:54:38 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011406.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Apr 6 20:56:39 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011407.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Apr 6 20:58:39 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011408.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Apr 6 21:00:41 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011409.html

2 1

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: z3c.ptcompat/trunk/ - Added support for browser:addform, browser:editform, browser:form,
by Stephan Richter 07 Apr '09

07 Apr '09

On Monday 06 April 2009, Sidnei da Silva wrote: > I've done as you asked, and made the import conditional. > > However, I can't see how this can be conditional at all (in fact, I > couldn't setup an environment to test it!) due to the fact that > zope.app.form is a dependency for zope.app.security and zope.formlib, > which apparently get pulled by zope.app.publisher, which z3c.ptcompat > depends on. I could be wrong though, so please correct me! Mmh, that sucks. Really zope.app.publisher and zope.app.security should not pull in zope.app.form. While we have those unfortunate dependencies now, we should not try to stengthen them. I am still convinced that z3c.ptcompat should only handle PT compatibility not any high-level features. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter Web Software Design, Development and Training Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter"

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zope.app.generations/trunk/src/zope/app/generations/README.txt made blocks consistent
by Benji York 06 Apr '09

06 Apr '09

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Baiju M <mbaiju(a)zeomega.net> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Michael Howitz <mh(a)gocept.com> wrote: >> Am 05.04.2009 um 22:00 schrieb Baiju M: >>> >>> In reStructuredText, I think two colons "::"" is required to make it >>> source text ? >> >> No, double colons mark literal blocks [1]. >> Doctest blocks are marked by ">>>" at the beginning of the line. [2] >> >> [1] >> http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#literal-… >> [2] >> http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#doctest-… > > Why we cannot use literal blocks for source code ? > >From the above documentations, I can see that it works for doctest. > And we have used it in many places. Also in PyPI > (long_description), it looks better. Please see http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2008-August/033010.html (adding zope-dev and removing checkins) -- Benji York Senior Software Engineer Zope Corporation

3 3