May 2009 - Zope-Dev - Zope lists

zope.app.component 3.8.2 release
by Alexander J Smith 22 May '09

22 May '09

I released a new version of zope.app.component to fix a bug introduced in the recently deprecation of its metadirectives. Packages that were broken by this should use this new version. -- Alex Smith Software Engineer Zope Corporation

2 1

Zope Tests: 8 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 22 May '09

22 May '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu May 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri May 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu May 21 21:01:38 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011761.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu May 21 21:03:42 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011762.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu May 21 21:05:55 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011763.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu May 21 21:08:01 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011764.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu May 21 21:10:03 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011765.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu May 21 21:12:11 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011766.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu May 21 21:14:12 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011767.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu May 21 21:16:13 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011768.html

1 0

zope.app.component is now deprecated
by Martijn Faassen 21 May '09

21 May '09

Hi there, I've factored more bits out of zope.app.component; the last bits could go into zope.component. zope.app.component is now deprecated. I've made new releases of zope.app.component and zope.app.interface, along with zope.component. If a package depends on zope.app.component, try to fix the dependencies to point to the underlying packages. These are: zope.component [zcml] (zope:view, zope:resource directives) zope.security (various require directives) zope.componentvocabulary (component vocabularies) zope.site (site folder functionality) You can study zope.app.component's BBB code to see what needs to be modified. Hopefully this will allow us to untangle the overall import dependency story some more soon. Regards, Martijn

1 0

Zope Tests: 8 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 21 May '09

21 May '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed May 20 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu May 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed May 20 21:05:02 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011753.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed May 20 21:07:07 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011754.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed May 20 21:09:08 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011755.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed May 20 21:11:09 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011756.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed May 20 21:13:12 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011757.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed May 20 21:15:13 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011758.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed May 20 21:17:16 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011759.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed May 20 21:19:16 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011760.html

1 0

Availability of windows binaries for zope.container on Python 2.5
by Alec Munro 21 May '09

21 May '09

Hi List, Just trying to install Grok, and as seems to be the tradition, some package updates have resulted in requiring a Visual Studio compiler to be installed. In this case, it seems to be zope.container 3.8.2. Is there a possibility of making a binary for this available? Thanks, Alec

3 5

Zope 2.12.0 beta 1 released
by Andreas Jung 20 May '09

20 May '09

Hi there, I tagged and released Zope 2.12.0 beta 1 today (basically identical with the latest alpha but it includes ZODB 3.9.0 beta 1). I will cut an official 2.12 release branch at the time of the beta 2 release (except someone needs the trunk to be open for new developments). In general: the current trunk is closed for new features or other major changes until I cut the release branch. Ask on the zope-dev list if you are in doubt. The further release schedule basically depends on the ZODB release schedule since Zope 2.12.0 final will be released with ZODB 3.9.0 final. Andreas -- ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: info(a)zopyx.com - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376 Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, Handelsregister A 381535 Geschäftsführer/Gesellschafter: ZOPYX Limited, Birmingham, UK ------------------------------------------------------------------------ E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting

7 14

(REMINDER) Updated e-mail addresses due this week
by Tres Seaver 20 May '09

20 May '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 (Please forgive the crosspost, and follow up to me directly with questions, rather than CC'ing the lists). In order to complete the transition of copyrights from Zope Corporation to the Zope Foundation, we need to refresh all committer agreements, and therefore need to be able to reach all committers via a valid e-mail address. If you have ever made a checkin to the the Zope CVS or subversion repositories, please verify that your profile information on www.zope.org is up to date (the e-mail address, in particular). The Zope Foundation board will be sending out a request for the new forms within the next week: committers who do not make a timely reply to that request will have their checkin access suspended until they complete the form. If you know a committer who is unlikely to receive this e-mail via one of the cross-posted lists, please forward this e-mail to them Thank you for your cooperation, and for your continued support of Zope! Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKFBUK+gerLs4ltQ4RAhcoAKCx2v+rVe7i8mNy991CesILn9Xq6gCfePKa zCxBX/6d6a6DvUO1Jh+cdnU= =n4Cc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Zope Tests: 8 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 20 May '09

20 May '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue May 19 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed May 20 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue May 19 20:47:27 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011745.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue May 19 20:49:31 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011746.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue May 19 20:51:32 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011747.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue May 19 20:53:33 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011748.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue May 19 20:55:33 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011749.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue May 19 20:57:33 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011750.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue May 19 20:59:35 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011751.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue May 19 21:01:35 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011752.html

1 0

Why does restrictedTraverse() in Zope 2 not respect IPublishTraverse adapters?
by Martin Aspeli 20 May '09

20 May '09

Hi, There's currently a funny inconsistency in Zope's Traversable class. If you have a URL like http://localhost:8080/path/to/@@aview/foo, and @@aview implements IPublishTraverse (and, I presume, if there's a custom IPublishTraverse adapter for any other path component), URL traversal will work fine, but calling to.restrictedTraverse('@@aview/foo') or some variant thereof will fail, because (un)restrictedTraverse() does not respect custom IPublishTraverse adapters. I can kind of see why it's done like this since it's called I*Publish*Traverse, but it is a pain. Note that namespace traversal (like ++skin++) works fine with restrictedTraverse(). I don't think it'd be hard to implement this, but: - is this a bug? - is there a reason not to do this? Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book

5 5

movedaddedremoved branches of zope.container and zope.lifecycleevent
by Chris McDonough 19 May '09

19 May '09

I've created two codependent branches of zope.container and zope.lifecyclevent: http://svn.zope.org/zope.container/branches/movedaddedremoved/ http://svn.zope.org/zope.lifecycleevent/branches/movedaddedremoved/ The intent was to move ``IObjectMovedEvent``, ``IObjectAddedEvent``, ``IObjectRemovedEvent`` interfaces and ``ObjectMovedEvent``, ``ObjectAddedEvent`` and ``ObjectRemovedEvent`` to the ``zope.lifecycleevent`` event package. Merging this would allow us to reduce dependencies on zope.container in other packages (instead, those packages would just depend on zope.lifecycleevent, which has very few dependencies). zope.intid is one such package (although it still will have one niggling dependency on "IContained" from zope.container even after it started to import event stuff from zope.lifecycleevent) I don't know if merging this stuff is reasonable. I do understand the difference between "lifecycle events" and "container events" and the events I moved out are definitely container events. I just wonder if it matters to be completely correct terminology-wise here. The other alternative is to create another package. - C

3 11