- Zope-Dev - Zope lists

XML-RPC does not work under the paster process
by Michael Haubenwallner 26 May '09

26 May '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 When using paste.httpserver instead of twisted.wsgi server zope.publisher.xmlrpc.XMLRPCRequest.processInputs() hangs when reading 0 Bytes from the request (wsgi.input <socket._fileobject object>). As i found the zope.publisher.http.HTTPInputStream.readlines() signature was changed 3 years ago from readlines(self, hint=None) to readlines(self, hint=0) http://svn.zope.org/Zope3/trunk/src/zope/publisher/http.py?rev=66941&r1=669… Do you think we could revert the change? Bugs reported: zopeproject: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/283089 grokproject: https://bugs.launchpad.net/grok/+bug/332063 Regards Michael - -- http://blog.d2m.at http://planetzope.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJvRDVl0uAvQJUKVYRAuMZAJ0eZBKjoInmx5CigwgjUf2gDpQyXQCfTBh5 IVbnn5i1v5WAwGPJxUJWCZs= =+cQ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 6

How to include a <style media="print"....> CSS file?
by Hermann Himmelbauer 26 May '09

26 May '09

Hi, I'm currently to make my application printer-friendly, thus I'd like to include a print-CSS file. Currently, I include CSS-files like that: -------------------------------------------------------- <resourceLibrary name="bspskin-lib" layer="zbsp.skin.interfaces.IBSPLayer" > <directory source="lib" include="base.css" /> </resourceLibrary> -------------------------------------------------------- This creates the following code: -------------------------------------------------------- <style type="text/css" media="all">  </style> -------------------------------------------------------- What I'd like to have now is to include some other CSS-file with media="print". The zc.resourcelibrary code seems not to be able to handle this, so I'm curious how to do this: 1) Simply write this directly into my page template 2) Hack zc.resourcelibrary, e.g. add a ZCML-directive "media" 3) Use some other package I'm unaware of Any suggestions? Best Regards, Hermann -- hermann(a)qwer.tk GPG key ID: 299893C7 (on keyservers) FP: 0124 2584 8809 EF2A DBF9 4902 64B4 D16B 2998 93C7

3 2

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: zope.app.pagetemplate/tags/3.7.0/src/zope/app/pagetemplate/tests/test_simpleviewclass.py Coverage.
by Tres Seaver 26 May '09

26 May '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stephan Richter wrote: > On Monday 25 May 2009, Tres Seaver wrote: >> Log message for revision 100382: >> Coverage. > > On a tag? My bad: I switched a checkout to the tag to make a release. Note that I then further borked the tag by recopying the trunk there. I have since erased the tag and recopied from the trunk at the original revision. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKG0vw+gerLs4ltQ4RAnW6AJ9cMZNSFU5Aiw5XvKfkcfrF3jUS2ACeOnhT Yg0AnDllgXjc7cA/sE/xLBA= =po29 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

RFC: zope.app.pagetemplate.engine dependencies
by Tres Seaver 26 May '09

26 May '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Resolution #1 ============= Whereas: - - The 'zope.app.pagetemplate.engine' module pulls in nothing from 'zope.app' packages except some antique testing support in doctest; - - that module is potentially useful outside the scope of the Zope3 ZMI; therefore be it resolved: - - that we move the 'engine' module to 'zope.pagetemplate', along with its supporting scaffolding, and clean up the tests. Resolution #2 ============= Whereas: - - The 'evaluateInlineCode' support in the 'engine' module has no tests; - - its comments indicate that it exists to support 'zope.app.pythonpage', which doesn't even import the module; - - third-party consumers of the feature have a recently-released version of the egg which they can continue using indefinitely; therefore be it resolved: - - that we remove the code entirely, documenting the backward incompatibility in a new feature release. Resolution #3 ============= Whereas: - - In Zope2, the 'Products.PageTemplates.Expressions' module depends on the 'zope.app.pagetemplates.engine' module, but only uses its 'ZopeEngine' class; - - Zope2 further supplies its own context class (to avoid using the Zope3 security model); - - one remaining bit of non-overridden functionality is the Zope3- proxified 'getFunctionNamespace' wrapper, which probably won't work at all as intended; - - the other bit is the use of the AdapterNamespaces bit, which feeds into the 'getFunctionNamespace' bit; therefore be it resolved: - - that we forego using the 'ZopeEngine' class completely in Zope2, providing instead a forked / simplified implementation. Debate, anyone? Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKGsle+gerLs4ltQ4RAgNKAJwOyvPTdkV40l6YaE7LgXNvts9eagCdHlRF WYPBpVkAXT7nBhX9hSTj9rY= =5xWq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 6

Zope Tests: 5 OK, 3 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 25 May '09

25 May '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun May 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon May 25 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun May 24 20:57:53 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011790.html Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun May 24 20:59:55 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011791.html Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun May 24 21:01:55 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011792.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun May 24 20:47:37 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011785.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun May 24 20:49:41 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011786.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun May 24 20:51:45 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011787.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun May 24 20:53:46 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011788.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun May 24 20:55:52 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011789.html

2 1

package dependency refactoring progress report
by Martijn Faassen 25 May '09

25 May '09

Hi there, This is a progress report on the package dependency refactoring work. We've had a lot of people contribute to this process (thanks everybody!), and bit by bit we are able to make a serious impact on dependencies. Yay! Let's take for example zope.app.publisher, which a few weeks ago had a dependency structure like this: http://startifact.com/depgraphs/zope.app.publisher-before.svg (60 dependencies, including zope.app.form and zope.formlib). After a lot of work on a lot of packages, we now have a dependency structure like this: http://startifact.com/depgraphs/zope.app.publisher-after.svg (45 dependencies, no more form related stuff) Still a big graph, but a lot simpler nonetheless, and down 15 packages. So, due to the recent changes we've now managed to cut away zope.app.form and zope.formlib entirely from zope.app.publisher's dependency chain (except for the tests). The main dependency cycles we started out with in the big graph were these: http://startifact.com/depgraphs/zope_app_publisher_cycles.svg After some work we'd gotten it down to this: http://startifact.com/depgraphs/zope_app_publisher_cycles2.svg And by now the main cycles left are these: http://startifact.com/depgraphs/zope_app_publisher_cycles3.svg So, the only dependency cycles left in zope.app.publisher are these: zope.app.publisher <--> zope.app.publication <--> zope.app.http And also this (familiar) one: zope.container <--> zope.filerepresentation I need to do some more analysis to see what other complexities we have in the dependency chain in the ZTK. One obvious set of tasks is to continue evaluating dependencies of things like zope.app.publisher to see whether we cannot take out a few more. Just study the graph and see what can be done by examining the code: http://startifact.com/depgraphs/zope.app.publisher-after.svg For instance, what is zope.app.pagetemplate doing depending on zope.dublincore? What about its direct dependency on zope.container? Another set of tasks is to examine all the test dependencies we have, as those are way more complicated than the main dependencies. Ideally our test dependencies shrink to nothing as well. This will be a hard slog as we rewrite tests, but we can target one dependency at the time, too. Regards, Martijn

5 20

zc.buildout problem
by Adam GROSZER 24 May '09

24 May '09

Hello, Following just happened. The project has KGS 3.4 versions as a base, locally I wanted to override lxml to >= 2.1.1. [...snip...] extends = http://download.zope.org/zope3.4/3.4.0/versions.cfg versions = versions [versions] lxml >= 2.1.1 [...snip...] The bin/buildout -vvvvv output was: Installing 'zc.buildout', 'setuptools'. We have the distribution that satisfies 'zc.buildout==1.1.1'. We have the distribution that satisfies 'setuptools==0.6c9'. [...snip...] Configuration data: [...snip...] [versions] [...snip...] lxml = 1.3.6 lxml > = 2.1.1 [...snip...] Getting required 'lxml==1.3.6' We have the distribution that satisfies 'lxml==1.3.6'. [...snip...] I thought the local [versions] would override the inherited ones? If I put lxml = 2.1.1 buildout nicely picks 2.1.1 Is this a bug? -- Best regards, Adam GROSZER mailto:agroszer@gmail.com -- Quote of the day: Time is nature's way of making sure that everything doesn't happen at once.

3 2

[action required] Zope Contributor Agreement change
by Jens Vagelpohl 24 May '09

24 May '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Please exclude the mass-email, most of you will receive this more than once, we're hoping to catch any current contributor whose email address on zope.org is not current. Anyone who has svn.zope.org checkin privileges and has not received personal email with the content below, please read and follow the instructions, otherwise you may find yourself without access. Thanks! jens - ----------------------------------------------- You may be aware that the copyright for software stored in the software repositories on svn.zope.org has recently been assigned to the Zope Foundation, from the earlier copyright holder Zope Corporation. The old contributor agreements expressly assigned a joint copyright to Zope Corporation for any software checked into svn.zope.org repositories. With the Zope Foundation taking over these copyrights, the agreement with the contributors needs to change so that the Zope Foundation is the joint copyright holder for all new code coming into the repositories. For you as a contributor this means you need to submit a new contributor agreement[1] if you want to stay on as an active contributor to Zope and/or the other software hosted in the repositories on svn.zope.org. Here's how: - - download the new agreement[1] - - fill in the new agreement, and since you are a current contributor it is OK to enter Jim Fulton (jim(a)zope.com) as the required reference committer - - sign and date the agreement - - either scan the agreement and email it to foundation-info(a)zope.org, or fax it to the Zope Foundation fax number +1 (703) 842-8076 To ensure a timely copyright transition we ask you to submit the new contributor agreement no later than June 17, 2009. The Zope Foundation board will try to contact any contributor who has not replied at that point between June 18 and June 26, and on June 26 checkin access will be removed for those who have not sent in the new agreement. Thanks again for your support! Jens Vagelpohl Secretary, Zope Foundation Board of Directors [1] http://foundation.zope.org/agreements/ZopeFoundation_Committer_Agreement -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkoZOwkACgkQRAx5nvEhZLLfxwCglA45Oyk3fIr8uUasH5O4BQc9 VIEAnA2Tdk/Yh3C5bDlnIcaCklcQd/Ci =/wUA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Zope Tests: 8 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 24 May '09

24 May '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat May 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun May 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat May 23 20:47:53 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011777.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat May 23 20:49:56 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011778.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat May 23 20:52:04 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011779.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat May 23 20:54:04 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011780.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat May 23 20:56:04 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011781.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat May 23 20:58:06 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011782.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat May 23 21:00:06 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011783.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat May 23 21:02:08 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-May/011784.html

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.form 2.0 release?
by Malthe Borch 24 May '09

24 May '09

Hello Adam, –– The z3c.pt package shouldn't have difficult dependencies; it depends on zope.i18n >= 3.5 but reasons unknown to me (Hanno CC'ed). Note that the package no longer depends on ``lxml``. \malthe

4 9