- Zope-Dev - Zope lists

Request for updated e-mail addresses
by Tres Seaver 24 Apr '09

24 Apr '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 (Please forgive the crosspost, and follow up to me directly with questions, rather than CC'ing the lists). In order to complete the transition of copyrights from Zope Corporation to the Zope Foundation, we need to refresh all committer agreements, and therefore need to be able to reach all committers via a valid e-mail address. If you have ever made a checkin to the the Zope CVS or subversion repositories, please verify that your profile information on www.zope.org is up to date (the e-mail address, in particular). The Zope Foundation board will be sending out a request for the new forms within the next month: committers who do not make a timely reply to that request will have their checkin access suspended until they complete the form. If you know a committer who is unlikely to receive this e-mail via one of the cross-posted lists, please forward this e-mail to them Thank you for your cooperation, and for your continued support of Zope! Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJ8eCz+gerLs4ltQ4RAkk5AJ9Fh9Mm7IzHmBxHRgSRSvFat728GgCeMOr6 Kz94Hbg2KGZqpjtd1XCmBOk= =8gi4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Zope Tests: 8 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 24 Apr '09

24 Apr '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Apr 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Apr 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Apr 23 20:53:24 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011539.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Apr 23 20:55:37 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011540.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Apr 23 20:57:37 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011541.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Apr 23 20:59:37 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011542.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Apr 23 21:01:38 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011543.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Apr 23 21:03:38 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011544.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Apr 23 21:05:38 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011545.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Apr 23 21:07:40 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011546.html

1 0

Zope 2.12.0a2 released
by Andreas Jung 24 Apr '09

24 Apr '09

I just released Zope 2.12.0a2: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Zope2/2.12.0a2 The problems I reported earlier this week with Acquistion/Extension class on a 64bit Linux system could not be reproduced on another system. Working easy_install support is still lacking. I think we will follow the approach providing a dedicated index (as Tres pointed out several times in former postings). The regarding the 'old-style' source tar-ball. My suggestion is to drop it. Supported, documented and recommended installation methods should be - zc.buildout (working) - virtualenv + easy_install (see above) Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind regards, Andreas Jung --- ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: info(a)zopyx.com - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376 Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, Handelsregister A 381535 Geschäftsführer/Gesellschafter: ZOPYX Limited, Birmingham, UK ------------------------------------------------------------------------ E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting

6 18

Designs for zope2.zope.org available - Feedback welcome
by Andreas Jung 23 Apr '09

23 Apr '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, I happy to be able to present three different Designs for the upcoming Zope 2 microsite. All designs were developed by Alma Ong of Clearnoodle.com. Find the designs here http://zope2.zopyx.de/designs and please leave some comment until May 25th 2009. After that we will review the comments and make the final choice. "We" are: Robert Rottermann (Redcor) Gerhard Hug (Redcor) Alma Ong (Clearnoodle) Andreas Jung (ZOPYX) Alan Runyan (Enfold) Andreas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAknpfdwACgkQCJIWIbr9KYwypwCbBnsQ2bXFhrljWmjsfHTojUmZ bTsAoOXhofQJnUDDqzivTku88sYzJ2ZT =QoJU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 5

Proposal: Remove the dependency of zope.app.exception on zope.formlib
by Michael Howitz 23 Apr '09

23 Apr '09

Hi, zope.app.exception depends on zope.formlib to use the NamedTemplate for the Unauthorized view. As zope.formlib has many dependencies I propose to depend on z3c.template to get a named template. (Even z3c.layer.pagelet depends on zope.app.exception (for the Unauthorized view) and so it depends on zope.formlib.) I implemented the proposal in svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/ zope.app.exception/branches/icemac_no_formlib (I also added a minimized patch of my changes to this e-mail.) Any comments on this implementation? Should I do the include <include package="z3c.template" file="meta.zcml" /> in zope.app.exception's configure.zcml or only in the ftesting.zcml? Yours sincerely, -- Michael Howitz · mh(a)gocept.com · software developer gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 8 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development

3 4

Zope Tests: 8 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 23 Apr '09

23 Apr '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Apr 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Apr 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 22 20:50:14 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011531.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 22 20:52:16 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011532.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 22 20:54:20 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011533.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 22 20:56:20 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011534.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 22 20:58:21 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011535.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 22 21:00:21 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011536.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 22 21:02:21 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011537.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.1 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Apr 22 21:04:21 EDT 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-April/011538.html

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] Request to mailing list Foundation-Info rejected
by Lacko Roman 23 Apr '09

23 Apr '09

Hi, Could someone explain me what that message means ? > -----Original Message----- > From: foundation-info-bounces(a)mail.zope.org [mailto:foundation-info- > bounces(a)mail.zope.org] > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 6:59 PM > To: Lacko Roman > Subject: Request to mailing list Foundation-Info rejected > > Your request to the Foundation-Info mailing list > > Posting of your message titled "Zope Committer Agreement" > > has been rejected by the list moderator. The moderator gave the > following reason for rejecting your request: > > "No reason given" > > Any questions or comments should be directed to the list administrator > at: > > foundation-info-owner(a)mail.zope.org I have have followed instructions at http://docs.zope.org/developer/becoming-a-contributor.html Thanks in advance Roman

2 1

zope.documentetemplate breaks with unicode
by Jens W. Klein 23 Apr '09

23 Apr '09

We're using zope.documenttemplate for ArchGenXML code generation. If we feed it with unicode-strings it breaks while joining its rendered parts, see http://zope3.pov.lt/trac/browser/zope.documenttemplate/trunk/ src/zope/documenttemplate/pdocumenttemplate.py#L335 I know, DTML is rarely used, but for code-generation its fine. Is this a bug or does DTML not support unicode? regards Jens -- Jens W. Klein - Klein & Partner KEG - BlueDynamics Alliance

2 1

People in the "Zope 3" and "ZMI" teams
by Martijn Faassen 22 Apr '09

22 Apr '09

Hi there, Just so we don't lose track of who are interested in maintaining Zope 3 (and/or the ZMI). I've distilled the following list of people who are interested in helping maintain Zope 3. This might mean making sure existing apps work, maintaining or replacing the ZMI, and working on making sure installation works. We can work out these details over time. I've sorted it all more or less in the order of perceived commitment, based on my statements and wild guesses on my part, I might be completely wrong. If you want to help, please reply to this thread and indicate your support. I'd suggest if you want to help you talk to the people nearer to the top of the list. But what typically works better is for the people on this list to tell zope-dev what they're doing, and how others could help them with particular bits, on a regular basis. Yusei TAHARA ------------ Concerning the ZMI: "For me, the ZMI is useful to managing local components, security settings, making views for ad hoc changes etc. I think it could be an optional package like grokui.admin. I'm interested in maintenance it." I'll note that Yusei is planning to start work on rearranging the ZMI into a smaller set of packages (by moving code into "zmi.core") soon. Please help him if you're interested! Fabio Tranchitella ------------------ "If the question was "who is interested in zope3, the application server, and willing to maintain it", I'd answer "me"." Concerning the ZMI: "We use the ZMI to manage applications, where applications are instances of a content object stored in the ZODB. All in all, we manage applications in a similar way we manage plone sites in zope2.x. If this specific feature is going to be removed, I'm willing to support and maintain it." Uli Fouquet ----------- On a UI for installation of apps, possibly to be shared inside the Zope Toolkit: "I'd be willing to help" He adds: "although I don't feel qualified enough to drive such a process." Stephan Richter --------------- "I have no problem keeping the Zope 3 KGS releases alive." Concerning the ZMI: "I have not used the ZMI since 2 years now and I am still considering myself writing Zope 3 apps." Concerning a documentation website for Zope 3: "I am not interested about that." Albertas Agejevas ----------------- "I'm very interested that existing applications that use the the zope.app server remain usable with future versions of Zope Toolkit libraries, or Zope 3 KGS if you will." He also adds: "I'm not interested in documentation or maintaining the installation story on any platform, that is attracting new users" Roger Ineichen -------------- "I'm willing to help to find a way to move the old code parts to a newer and better concept." Roger also says he's interested in maintaining the ZMI in some form or find something new to migrate to. "I will help to support such a Zope Toolkit management app which will allow to get rid of the zmi part." I'm not sure what he means with "the old code" He adds: "Note, I don't use this code in my own projects and I don't propose to do that just for fun. But if someone proposes to do it, I'm willing to help." Baiju M ------- "I am interested to maintain the packages necessary to create a simple application out of the box." He adds: "This is just an academic interest :)" Regards, Martijn

3 11

SVN Write access procedure
by Behrang Dadsetan 22 Apr '09

22 Apr '09

Hi! After 8-9 years of admiring Zope and using it now and then, I finally got myself to contribute to the grok project. I hope to contribute even more in the near and mid-term future. We seem to have an issue with the documentation for becoming an SVN Contributor. Here are the steps I followed and the dead-end I got to. Following diverse people's advice, I followed the instructions from http://www.zope.org/DevHome/Subversion/ImpatientPeoplesGuideToRequestingCom… which basically points to http://docs.zope.org/developer/becoming-a-contributor.html I filled out the form, scanned it and mailed the scan to foundation-info(a)zope.org as mentioned in the contact details of the foundation on the 18th of April. Shortly afterwards, I received an automated response: Subject: Your message to Foundation-Info awaits moderator approval [snip] The reason it is being held: Message body is too big: 1817623 bytes with a limit of 40 KB [snip] After this was a lengthy silence. So I followed the next step from becoming-a-contributor.html which says to nag Jim Fulton. The problem is Jim never heard of this process and never saw my initial request. He was suprised the DevHome/ImpatientPeopleGuide.. was modified. Any suggestions what the new process should be? Is the Zope foundation now responsible for giving SVN Write access now that the form is about sharing copyright with the Foundation? If so, who can one nag within the Zope Foundation? We need to update the documentation of this procedure once we figured it out :) Thanks! Ben.

4 3