- Zope-Dev - Zope lists

Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Feb 15 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Feb 16 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Feb 15 20:58:43 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011120.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Feb 15 20:44:25 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011113.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Feb 15 20:46:35 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011114.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Feb 15 20:48:35 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011115.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Feb 15 20:50:35 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011116.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Feb 15 20:52:42 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011117.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Feb 15 20:54:42 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011118.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Feb 15 20:56:42 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011119.html

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] [dev] five.localsitemanager: dependencies
by Tres Seaver 15 Feb '09

15 Feb '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Charlie Clark wrote: > Am 12.02.2009 um 14:45 schrieb yuppie: > >> install_requires=[ >> 'setuptools', >> 'Zope2 >= 2.12.dev', >> ], >> >> Is that the right way to resolve that issue? Could it cause any >> trouble >> if I would check in that change? > > > Only for someone wishing to use it totally outside of a Zope context. Given that package's job in life, I strongly doubt that we need to worry about anybody using it outside of a Zope2 app. In fact, I think it might be a good idea just to fold the package back into Zope2 (I don't recall why it ever shipped separately). > I'm not that familiar with Buildout but I would have thought that any > direct import dependencies should be listed - and zope.location > doesn't seem to be (neither are zope.event or zope.site for that > matter). OTOH the condition >= seems to be being incorrectly > interpreted. If this is a bug then it should be filed. The transitive dependencies of another dependency don't need to be listed: the problem Yuppie was fixing was a set of over-specific dependencies, now redundant in the new, egg-centric world of Zope 2.12. I think another fix would be to move the Zope2 import to the top of the list, so that its own, more specific dependencies would be installed first: however, I don't see much win over Yuppie's fix. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJlxyD+gerLs4ltQ4RAnMhAKCVNpXav5TpO17EQDJKPeIE/JLC1wCfVzWY maFcuCWJJY09WMDwxsYz4G4= =wJCe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 4

Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 15 Feb '09

15 Feb '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Feb 14 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Feb 15 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Feb 14 21:02:52 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011112.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Feb 14 20:48:38 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011105.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Feb 14 20:50:44 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011106.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Feb 14 20:52:44 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011107.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Feb 14 20:54:45 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011108.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Feb 14 20:56:45 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011109.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Feb 14 20:58:52 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011110.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Feb 14 21:00:52 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011111.html

1 0

Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 14 Feb '09

14 Feb '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Feb 13 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Feb 14 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Feb 13 20:59:58 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011104.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Feb 13 20:45:47 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011097.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Feb 13 20:47:53 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011098.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Feb 13 20:49:53 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011099.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Feb 13 20:51:53 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011100.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Feb 13 20:53:56 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011101.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Feb 13 20:55:57 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011102.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Feb 13 20:57:57 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011103.html

1 0

Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 13 Feb '09

13 Feb '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Feb 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Feb 13 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 12 21:03:41 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011096.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 12 20:49:35 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011089.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 12 20:51:38 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011090.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 12 20:53:38 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011091.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 12 20:55:38 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011092.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 12 20:57:38 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011093.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 12 20:59:41 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011094.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 12 21:01:41 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011095.html

1 0

OpenSpace@PyCon 2009 about Zope/Repoze/Grok/Deliverence etc.
by Lennart Regebro 13 Feb '09

13 Feb '09

Lots of things have happened in the Zope universe the last couple of years, and are still happening, some of which are turning Zope inside out, from a monolithic ghetto to a componentized agile speed monster. People outside the Zope world doesn't know about it, and although the Zope community mostly seems to be on the same page, I think it would be nice if we get as many as possible together to discuss the status and where things are going. And, if we don't have anything to discuss, we can drop off to some bar and toast at how great Zope is. :-) So, I propose to have an Open Space session at PyCon, Chicago, March 27-29 . As this is a part of the "unconference" bit of PyCon, you don't have to sign up, but you can say if you are coming here anyway, just so we get a feeling for the interest. And although we can't decide when to do this yet, if you are only able to go to PyCon certain days, say so here, so we'll know when we can get the most participants. -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64

9 14

Translations for zope packages.
by Dan Korostelev 13 Feb '09

13 Feb '09

Nowadays, when we have a fully egg-based setup, the translations in the zope.app.locales package make no sense anymore as it's very hard to maintain them and it just wrong (to me at least) to have a separate centralized translations package for a hundred of eggs. The zope.i18n >= 3.5.0 have a feature of merging multiple message catalogs registered for the same domain. So we have two options here: a) Continue use the "zope" translation domain for all packages and make each package provide own message catalog to be merged into "zope" domain. b) Make every package provide its own translation domain. So say zope.container will have and register its own domain named "zope.container". Either option is fine with me, however b) helps to avoid msgid clashes, whle a) allows us to reuse msgids. I'd like to hear community opinion on that and after we decide which option to choose I volunteer to migrate current zope.app.locales translations to every egg that have msgids, previously translated by zope.app.locales. However, that's kinda pain in the ass and I'll gladly accept any help on that. :-) -- WBR, Dan Korostelev

6 11

zopeproject and KGS
by Baiju M 13 Feb '09

13 Feb '09

Hi, What about using zope 3.5 development KGS in the trunk of zopeproject ?. To maintain zopeproject 0.4.2, we can create 0.4 branch. Regards, Baiju M

1 0

z3c.form 2.0
by Dan Korostelev 12 Feb '09

12 Feb '09

So here's a little review on current status of z3c.form. Mostly based on items from CHANGES.txt for 2.0 release :) I may forget something, so I'll reply to myself if something suddenly comes in my mind. And sorry for my English, i'm quite in hurry now. :-) FileWidget - It doesn't clear the bytes value if no new file is uploaded now, which is nice. But there's also should be a way to clear current value if the field is not required. I've added that to the TODOS.txt. I think that should be done before release to make the widget actually functional out of box. TextLinesWidget - Works. I've fixed a case when a field has tuple in its _type, so it hopefully will work in any case now. MultiWidget - Probably needs some review as it does the updateWidgets thing on "value" property setting, which seems fishy to me. It works however. I've added the check for min_length and max_length and conditional buttons in the browser version. One thing I'd like to see is that it generate a default number of input rows based on field's minimal length if there's any. Also, another thing that would be nice is to have a way to reorder values for orderable fields. However this can wait for next release. I've added that to the TODOS.txt. ObjectWidget/ObjectMultiWidget - ??? I didn't checked that out, so it would be nice if its author reviewied it and wrote here about its status. Source support - Seems to work fine. I've checked that out in my sandbox instance with zc.sourcefactory's context-less and context-based sources. However, there was some backward-incompatible refactorings (class renames) done to sequence data converters that breaks the z3c.pt benchmarking suite. This may also break end-users' code so we probably want to fix the compatibility. z3c.pt support - ??? I don't use the z3c.pt myself, so I didn't really checked that out. As I said before, the benchmarking suite is borked. Also, there's a strange bug with macros (see below). Also, we need to migrate to z3c.ptcompat instead of z3c.pt.compat (UPDATE: the merge was done while I was writing this). Tests - All are passing. However there was a failure with z3c.pt, I've described before. I don't know what's wrong there, but found a little workaround. See my comment in the tests/simple_groupedit.pt file. (UPDATE: tests are now borked again as a result of merging z3c.ptcompat branch while I was writing this). Translations - I've updated the template and the russian translation to be complete. I don't expect any msgid changes, so I think translators should review their translations and commit them right now :) Also, I wanted to add browser widget attributes like "klass" or "onclick" to adaptable values. This will require some work to make browser widgets automatically add their adaptable values to _adapterValueAttributes before calling parent's "update" method. I'm not sure that I'll be doing that very soon as it isn't very important. So this is definetely not a reason to wait with the release. One more thing I'd like to do is to add "klass" and "id" to the forms themselves so one could easily customize the visual appeal of the forms. But it's probably should be done in z3c.formui's subclasses and not in z3c.form's base classes. I'd like to hear the community opinion on that though. -- WBR, Dan Korostelev

7 26

Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 12 Feb '09

12 Feb '09

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Feb 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Feb 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 11 21:06:29 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011088.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 11 20:51:44 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011081.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 11 20:53:49 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011082.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 11 20:55:49 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011083.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 11 20:57:49 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011084.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 11 21:00:20 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011085.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 11 21:02:20 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011086.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Wed Feb 11 21:04:21 EST 2009 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2009-February/011087.html

1 0