- Zope-Dev - Zope lists

Zope Tests: 4 OK, 1 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 27 Oct '08

27 Oct '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Oct 26 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Mon Oct 27 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=3, errors=4) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 26 22:03:25 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010375.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 26 21:57:24 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010371.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 26 21:58:54 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010372.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 26 22:00:25 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010373.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Oct 26 22:01:55 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010374.html

2 2

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/AccessControl/tests/actual_python.py 'any' and 'all' are not builtins in Python 2.4.
by Tres Seaver 27 Oct '08

27 Oct '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: > Is this a typo? Yes, thanks for the catch. > On Oct 27, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: > >> def f13(): >> - assert any([True, True, True]) == True >> - assert any([True, False, True]) == True >> - assert any([False, False, False]) == False >> + try: >> + all > > I thinks this should be "any" instead of "all". > >> + except NameError: >> + pass # Python < 2.5 >> + else: >> + assert any([True, True, True]) == True >> + assert any([True, False, True]) == True >> + assert any([False, False, False]) == False >> f13() > > Arguably, if there's an "all", there will be "any", so it will work > the same, but looks a little strange to try for "all" and then use > "any" in assertion. > > Best regards, > > Zvezdan > - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJBh4o+gerLs4ltQ4RAtGGAJ45034n4Wyzc0ZjTHC2WMlA8p8auwCfWKhw BN0IJVXPJKAoJmPgj8Q4/Vw= =08ye -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: Zope/trunk/lib/python/zope/ - Revert to an older zope.testing. New one is way too new
by Tres Seaver 27 Oct '08

27 Oct '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sidnei da Silva wrote: > Log message for revision 92597: > - Revert to an older zope.testing. New one is way too new Before: > testing svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope.testing/tags/3.5.3/src/zope/testing After: > testing svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope.testing/tags/3.5.6/src/zope/testing Unless I'm seeing things, this is a bump to a newer version. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver(a)palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJBI4t+gerLs4ltQ4RAp5GAJwKox2PLxkNr7RNzq1BLFCWCH6cXACdEJJu GBp7u0bYrOsFTbcE+Fze1Gs= =qccz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Proposal: Make Zope2 smaller
by Hanno Schlichting 26 Oct '08

26 Oct '08

Hi. I'd like to get feedback on an idea I had recently. Problem Zope2 currently includes large parts of Zope 3. Not all of the zope.* and zope.app.* packages are maintained or are in use. Still Zope 2 includes large amounts of them and thus implicitly advertises them to be used. In addition they blow up the installed code size and add a long term maintenance burden. The move to gain Python 2.6 compatibility has shown some of this and I expect to see more work in moving to Python 3 at a later stage. Assumption Zope 2.12 will most probably see two kind of distributions. One is a Zope2 egg, consisting of one large Zope2 egg which pulls in everything that has been eggified on their own as dependencies. This includes the ZODB and all zope.* and zope.app.* packages. The second distribution is a tradtional tarball, which exactly matches the current distribution format. Proposal I'd like to change the egg distribution alone and introduce one setuptools extra to it. The old tarball distribution would stay the same. The standard Zope2 egg install would only include those zope.* and zope.app.* packages which it actually requires. The extra would be called 'zope_app' and pull in all zope.* and zope.app.* packages which we did include so far, but are not actually required to run Zope 2. For example: extras_require = dict( zope_app = [ 'zope.app.rotterdam', 'zope.app.<...>', ], ), Rational Any package that does require any of the zope.* or zope.app.* packages can define those as an explicit dependency itself. The zope_app extra makes the transition phase easier, in which packages do not yet declare all their dependencies. In the long run, the extra can be dropped entirely. This proposal makes it possible to get a smaller, well-defined Zope2 egg. The first egg release of Zope2 gives us an opportunity to do this move without breaking backwards compatibility. While Zope 2 has included large parts of Zope 3, it never exactly included all of it. As Zope 3 is not likely to see an ongoing monolithic release, I don't see a reason for Zope 2 to include Zope 3 in the monolithic fashion we do so far. Implementation This is not yet implemented but should be quite easy. Figuring out the exact packages which are required by Zope 2 is to be done. Questions / Comments / Feedback Are more than welcome. Hanno

4 3

New zope.interface release
by Hanno Schlichting 26 Oct '08

26 Oct '08

Hi, I just released a new zope.interface 3.5.0 to be found at http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.interface I uploaded a zipped source distribution and (as we have C extensions) Windows installers for Python 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6. Please contact me, if you find problems with it. Hanno

1 1

Zope Tests: 5 Failed
by Zope Tests Summarizer 26 Oct '08

26 Oct '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Oct 25 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Sun Oct 26 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Oct 25 20:59:16 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010366.html Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Oct 25 21:00:46 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010367.html Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Oct 25 21:02:16 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010368.html Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Oct 25 21:03:46 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010369.html Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Oct 25 21:05:16 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010370.html

1 0

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 25 Oct '08

25 Oct '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Oct 24 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Sat Oct 25 11:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Oct 24 20:56:52 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010361.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Oct 24 20:58:23 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010362.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Oct 24 20:59:53 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010363.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Oct 24 21:01:23 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010364.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri Oct 24 21:02:53 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010365.html

1 0

Blobs and modes
by Benji York 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

Is there a good reason blobs don't support "b" or "t" in the mode strings passed to "open"? I'm refactoring some code that expects a file-like object to use blobs and it wants to pass "wb" as the mode (which is a sane thing to do). I'll add support for "b" and "t" to the blob code if no one objects. -- Benji York Senior Software Engineer Zope Corporation

5 5

ZopePublication Competing writes/reads
by Hermann Himmelbauer 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

Hi, Just by chance, I pressed the reload button of my browser for quite some time, so that my Zope3-based site was reloaded over and over. I was surprised to find the following in the logs: 2008-10-20T18:45:15 WARNING ZopePublication Competing writes/reads at /BSPSite/act/s/info: database conflict error (oid 0x0733, class zope.session.session.SessionData) Can someone explain me why this happens, if this is something dangerous or if I can forget about it? I tested the site with Apache Bench (ab2), with many concurrent requests and could not reproduce the problem. So my wild guess is the following: I use session.PersistentSessionDataContainer for my session, so every request will probably read/write to some Zope3 container/btree. And then, for some reasons these reads/writes compete, which leads to the above warning. If I use AB2, there's no cookie, thus no session, hence the problem does not arise. On the other hand, the zope root site (the Rotterdam ZMI) seems not to have this problem, as it seems, I can't trigger this warning message with fast reloads. I'm unsure if I should just ignore that or do something about it. Any hints? Best Regards, Hermann -- hermann(a)qwer.tk GPG key ID: 299893C7 (on keyservers) FP: 0124 2584 8809 EF2A DBF9 4902 64B4 D16B 2998 93C7

6 8

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Oct 23 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Fri Oct 24 11:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Oct 23 20:55:28 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010356.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Oct 23 20:56:58 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010357.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Oct 23 20:58:28 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010358.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Oct 23 20:59:58 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010359.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Oct 23 21:01:28 EDT 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-October/010360.html

1 0