- Zope-Dev - Zope lists

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 29 Feb '08

29 Feb '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Feb 28 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Fri Feb 29 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Feb 28 21:59:19 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009180.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Feb 28 22:00:49 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009181.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Feb 28 22:02:20 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009182.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Feb 28 22:03:50 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009183.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Feb 28 22:05:21 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009184.html

1 0

Re: SVN: zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/ Removed 'shared-blob-dir' from blobstorage section
by Christian Zagrodnick 28 Feb '08

28 Feb '08

Hi On 2008-02-27 21:00:39 +0100, Nikolay Kim <fafhrd(a)datacom.kz> said: > Log message for revision 84351: > Removed 'shared-blob-dir' from blobstorage section could you tell me why you've removed the shared-blob-dir option? One could argue to remove the whole blob support from the recipe, but just removing the shared option is not useful IMHO. > > Changed: > U zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/CHANGES.txt > U zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/zc/recipe/filestorage/__init__.py > > -=- > Modified: zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/CHANGES.txt > =================================================================== > --- zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/CHANGES.txt 2008-02-27 19:49:55 UTC (rev 84350) > +++ zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/CHANGES.txt 2008-02-27 20:00:37 UTC (rev 84351) > @@ -2,6 +2,12 @@ > CHANGES > ======= > > +1.1.0 (2008-??-??) > +------------------ > + > +- Removed 'shared-blob-dir' from blobstorage section. > + > + > 1.0.0 (2007-11-03) > ------------------ > > > Modified: zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/zc/recipe/filestorage/__init__.py > =================================================================== > --- > zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/zc/recipe/filestorage/__init__.py 2008-02-27 > 19:49:55 UTC (rev 84350) > +++ > zc.recipe.filestorage/trunk/zc/recipe/filestorage/__init__.py 2008-02-27 > 20:00:37 UTC (rev 84351) > @@ -41,12 +41,10 @@ > blob_dir = os.path.join(buildout['buildout']['directory'], > blob_dir) > options['blob-dir'] = blob_dir > - shared = options.get('shared-blob-dir', 'no') > > options['zconfig'] = template % dict( > path=path, > - blob_dir=blob_dir, > - shared=shared) > + blob_dir=blob_dir) > > def install(self): > if self.make_part: > @@ -70,7 +68,6 @@ > <zodb> > <blobstorage> > blob-dir %(blob_dir)s > - shared-blob-dir %(shared)s > <filestorage> > path %(path)s > </filestorage> -- Christian Zagrodnick gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstrasse 29 · 06112 halle/saale www.gocept.com · fon. +49 345 12298894 · fax. +49 345 12298891

1 0

buildout 'versions' and 'develop' conflict
by Christophe Combelles 28 Feb '08

28 Feb '08

Hi, It seems that the 'versions' information in a buildout has a priority over 'develop'? What I wanted is to use the exact versions of the KGS: extends = http://download.zope.org/zope3.4/versions.cfg versions = versions Then for a particular egg (say, z3c.menu), use a develop-egg instead: develop = . z3c.menu However the develop-egg is never used, because of the version information. Shouldn't the 'develop' directive have a priority? Or is there another way to to what I want? thanks, Christophe

12 46

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 28 Feb '08

28 Feb '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Feb 27 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Thu Feb 28 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Feb 27 20:57:40 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009175.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Feb 27 20:59:10 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009176.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Feb 27 21:00:40 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009177.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Feb 27 21:02:10 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009178.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Wed Feb 27 21:03:41 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009179.html

1 0

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 27 Feb '08

27 Feb '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Feb 26 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Wed Feb 27 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Feb 26 20:59:59 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009170.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Feb 26 21:01:29 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009171.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Feb 26 21:02:59 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009172.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Feb 26 21:04:29 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009173.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Feb 26 21:06:00 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009174.html

1 0

Re: buildout 'versions' and 'develop' conflict
by Fred Drake 26 Feb '08

26 Feb '08

[Originally sent to Martin only; meant to send to the list.] On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Martijn Faassen <faassen(a)startifact.com> wrote: > Meanwhile, you're satisfied already with actually looking at setup.py of > the develop package and then repeating the version number *too*. It's > fascinating how people look differently at these things, isn't it? Heh. We have buildouts where multiple versions of a package are used by different parts of what's built. There's a real value in separating the meanings of "develop" and version requirements. We also typically work with the following settings, just to make sure we don't leave any information out of our build configuration: [buildout] allow-picked-versions = false use-dependency-links = false Having to repeat on ocaission isn't wonderful, but it's actually pretty unusual, and far better than leaving something out that can't be recovered later. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller

1 0

Zope Tests:
by Zope Tests Summarizer 26 Feb '08

26 Feb '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Feb 25 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Tue Feb 26 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were no messages.

1 0

zc.recipe.filestorage bug
by Nikolay Kim 26 Feb '08

26 Feb '08

Hello, Seem zc.recipe.filestorage has bug in blob-dir for this buildout config [var] recipe = zc.recipe.filestorage blob-dir = parts/varblobs zc.recipe.filestorage generates <zodb> <blobstorage> blob-dir ../parts/varblobs shared-blob-dir no <filestorage> path ../parts/var/Data.fs </filestorage> </blobstorage> </zodb> But 'shared-blob-dir' defined only for 'zeoclient'

1 0

Zope Tests: 5 OK
by Zope Tests Summarizer 25 Feb '08

25 Feb '08

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Feb 24 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Mon Feb 25 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Feb 24 21:17:21 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009165.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Feb 24 21:18:51 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009166.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Feb 24 21:20:21 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009167.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Feb 24 21:21:51 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009168.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Feb 24 21:23:21 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-February/009169.html

1 0

Mailinglists on Launchpad
by Christian Theune 25 Feb '08

25 Feb '08

Hi, Launchpad started the beta tests for their mailing list offers. A while ago we discussed this option for future hosting of the mailing lists. The current implementation has the restriction that the mailing lists can not be hosted using custom domains (@zope.org). I was contacted by Barry as I'm a beta tester who is somewhat representing the Zope developers for the LP team to find out whether we're interested in starting to test their service. Any opinions? Christian PS: Here's a link to the current documentation of the service: https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle (saale) - germany www.gocept.com - ct(a)gocept.com - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 - fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development

6 7