- Zope-Dev - Zope lists

buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
by buildbot＠zope.com 24 Dec '05

24 Dec '05

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: The web-page 'force build' button was pressed by '': Build Source Stamp: None Blamelist: BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

zope 2.9b2 and sessions
by Florent Guillaume 23 Dec '05

23 Dec '05

I'm in the middle of debugging important session machinery problems with the current zope 2.9 branch. (ReadConflictErrors happening when everything should be mvcc). Could the 2.9b2 release please hold until this can be resolved? FWIW I have a semi-reproducible testcase so I'm making progress. I hope by Saturday night it will be over -- but I'm having to learn the TemporaryStorage code at the same time. Florent -- Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D +33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com fg(a)nuxeo.com

2 1

buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin2
by buildbot＠zope.com 23 Dec '05

23 Dec '05

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin2. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 2446 Blamelist: andreasjung,urbanape BUILD FAILED: failed failed slave lost sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin2
by buildbot＠zope.com 23 Dec '05

23 Dec '05

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin2. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 2442 Blamelist: andreasjung,urbanape BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot
by buildbot＠zope.com 23 Dec '05

23 Dec '05

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 2442 Blamelist: andreasjung,urbanape BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot

1 0

Zope tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed
by Zope tests summarizer 23 Dec '05

23 Dec '05

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Dec 22 12:01:01 2005 UTC to Fri Dec 23 12:01:01 2005 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Unit Tests. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.2 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Dec 22 21:13:41 EST 2005 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-December/003833.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope-2_6-branch Python-2.1.3 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Dec 22 21:03:10 EST 2005 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-December/003826.html Subject: OK : Zope-2_6-branch Python-2.3.5 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Dec 22 21:04:41 EST 2005 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-December/003827.html Subject: OK : Zope-2_7-branch Python-2.3.5 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Dec 22 21:06:11 EST 2005 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-December/003828.html Subject: OK : Zope-2_7-branch Python-2.4.2 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Dec 22 21:07:41 EST 2005 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-December/003829.html Subject: OK : Zope-2_8-branch Python-2.3.5 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Dec 22 21:09:11 EST 2005 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-December/003830.html Subject: OK : Zope-2_8-branch Python-2.4.2 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Dec 22 21:10:41 EST 2005 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-December/003831.html Subject: OK : Zope-2_9-branch Python-2.4.2 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Thu Dec 22 21:12:11 EST 2005 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-December/003832.html

1 0

Zope 2.10: Wiki started
by Andreas Jung 23 Dec '05

23 Dec '05

I created a wiki for the 2.10 development: <http://www.zope.org/DevHome/Projects/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/Zope2.10/FrontP…> Feel free to contribute and comment. Andreas

2 1

zope-2.9 r40780 make install doesn't finish, files missing from bin
by Jeff Kowalczyk 23 Dec '05

23 Dec '05

I didn't receive any feedback on zope-general, but it could just be a problem with my environment that fails silently. Can anyone confirm that this isn't pilot error before I file a bug? Thanks. --- I'm having some trouble with the 'make install' stage of Zope-2.9 svn. Using python-2.4.2 on Gentoo linux. Zope-2.9.0b1 installed fine, but I needed the fix for get_transaction() ASAP. URL: svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/2.9 Revision: 40853 # ./configure --prefix=/usr/lib/zope-2.9.0 # make # make install (...) copying lib/python/zope/app/recorder/zope.app.recorder-configure.zcml -> /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/zopeskel/etc/package-includes copying lib/python/zope/app/pluggableauth/zope.app.pluggableauth-configure.zcml -> /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/zopeskel/etc/package-includes copying lib/python/zope/app/securitypolicy/securitypolicy-meta.zcml -> /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/zopeskel/etc/package-includes copying lib/python/zope/testbrowser/testbrowser-ftesting.zcml -> /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/zopeskel/etc/package-includes copying lib/python/zope/formlib/formlib-configure.zcml -> /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/zopeskel/etc/package-includes copying lib/python/zope/app/securitypolicy/securitypolicy.zcml -> /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/zopeskel/etc [ -f /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/bin/python ] || ln -sfn "/usr/bin/python" /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/bin/python Zope binaries installed successfully. Now run '/usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/bin/mkzopeinstance.py' This leaves (most visibly) many missing files in /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/bin/. Only the 'python' symlink, and 'zconfig zconfig_schema2html zdctl.py zdrun.py' are installed there. Other files may be missing if they came afterwards, I don't have information on that. Is this line indicating a terminating error in make install? [ -f /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/bin/python ] || ln -sfn "/usr/bin/python" /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/bin/python Subsequent runs don't resume installing the remaining files: # make install "/usr/bin/python" "/home/jtk/software/svn/Zope/setup.py" \ build_ext -i \ install --home="/usr/lib/zope-2.9.0" running build_ext running build_headers running install running build running build_py running build_scripts running install_lib running install_headers running install_scripts changing mode of /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/bin/zconfig to 755 changing mode of /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/bin/zconfig_schema2html to 755 changing mode of /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/bin/zdctl.py to 755 changing mode of /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/bin/zdrun.py to 755 running install_data [ -f /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/bin/python ] || ln -sfn "/usr/bin/python" /usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/bin/python Zope binaries installed successfully. Now run '/usr/lib/zope-2.9.0/bin/mkzopeinstance.py' Thanks for any insight on the issue. I don't think I want to run Zope in-place from the working copy.

12 35

What use cases are driving "make install" from a checkout?
by Jim Fulton 22 Dec '05

22 Dec '05

I'd like to step back and see if we can agree on what is driving the desire for "make install". I'll note that one reason is that it worked this way before, but I don't think that that is a good enough reason to delay the release. I'll note one use case: - A Zope deployer wants to deploy an unreleased version of Zope because they need some feature or bug fix that hasn't been released yet. Can anyone think of other use cases? Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:jim@zope.com Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org

4 4

[RfC] Removal of old stuff in Zope 2.10
by Andreas Jung 22 Dec '05

22 Dec '05

Hi, for next release we plan to replace several parts with the corresponding components from Zope 3 (e.g. ZPT´). Philipp is working on a proposal on that issue. In addition I would like to get rid of some old stuff that is no longer maintained and buggy: - ZopeTutorial (could be ripped off without implications and made available for download on zope.org) - HelpSys - from a programmers view pretty much useless and not very helpful. I consider to replace it with something more useful (not sure we can re-use apidoc from Zope 3 in some way, perhaps the inclusion of Dieter's Docfinder might be more useful for programmers) - Gadfly(DA) - do we really need this? We discussed this already. In my opinion the purpose of Gadfly is only educational but nothing that one really needs or uses for production. It could be removed and made available for download on zope.org. And my favourite enemy in Zope: ZClasses :-) I would like to mark them _clearly_ as an obsolete feature (DeprecationWarning, Warnings in the ZMI and the Zope Book). I _don't_ propose to remove them at some point but ppl should be aware that they are using one of the most-scary components in Zope (please no further discussion about the pros and cons of ZClasses..this discussion took already place already a bunch of times on the list). -aj

19 51