May 2012 - Zope-Dev - Zope lists

zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 41
by Zope tests summarizer 28 May '12

28 May '12

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-05-26 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-27 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux [1] Repository policy check found errors in 336 projects [2] Total languishing bugs for zope2: 13 [3] Total languishing bugs for zope: 74 [4] Total languishing bugs for zopeapp: 1 [5] Total languishing bugs for zopetoolkit: 209 ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED Repository policy check found errors in 336 projects https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063594.html [2] FAILED Total languishing bugs for zope2: 13 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063592.html [3] FAILED Total languishing bugs for zope: 74 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063591.html [4] FAILED Total languishing bugs for zopeapp: 1 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063588.html [5] FAILED Total languishing bugs for zopetoolkit: 209 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063589.html

1 0

Re: [Zope-dev] Remove zmi_views menus from zope.file?
by Leonardo Rochael Almeida 27 May '12

27 May '12

Hi Uli, Not sure if you wanted to remove zope-dev from copy on purpose, but what we talk about below is probably of general interest... On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Uli Fouquet <uli(a)gnufix.de> wrote: > Hi Leo, > > nice to hear from you, I hope you are well :-) I'm fine, thanks for asking! :-) Hope you're doing fine as well... > On Sun, 27 May 2012 16:16:43 +0200 Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: > >> IMHO: >> >> Move to a conditional include of a menu.zcml that (or include a >> menu.zcml file that conditionally) registers the browser menus for >> zmi_views and release a new minor version, declaring an extra >> dependency on the packages that provides zmi_views. With this, release >> a new minor version that will be backward compatible, due to the >> conditional. >> >> Then release a new major version that removes the include and the >> conditional. Add to README the instructions for manually including >> menu.zcml if this functionality is needed. >> >> If you get tired, do just one of the above :-) > > Yep, I planned in the same direction. The problem, however, is the > condition. The 'condition:zcml' directive, AFAICS, only asks for > existence of packages or features. But in the zope.file (or zmi_views) > case I'd have to ask for zope.app.menus.zmi_views (which wouldn't be a > package nor a feature). > > Furthermore if one asks for a package as condition, that could be wrong > as people could define a zmi_views menu elsewhere and then the > registrations should be included (okay, on the other hand one could tell > them to include the menus.zcml manually then). I guess we could argue that whoever provides the zmi_views menu should provide a respective feature. > Oh, and I haven't found out yet, which package exactly normally provides > the zmi_views menu. Do you know it by any chance? I tried to locate it as well, but failed. What I could discover is that whichever distribution provides this will likely include a <menu id="zmi_views" ...> directive somewhere. Since you mentioned on the grok list that previous versions of grok could work with zope.file, then perhaps you can search the eggs/ directory for this directive. Good hunting, and please keep us informed. Cheers, Leo

3 2

Remove zmi_views menus from zope.file?
by Uli Fouquet 27 May '12

27 May '12

Hi there, zope.file still registers browser menus for `zmi_views` in its browser.zcml. This is a problem if you don't have/want the ZMI but want to use zope.file otherwise (IMHO it also means an undeclared dependency, as none of the packages zope.file declares to depend on really provides this browser menu AFAICS). I see that it is easy to register such a menu yourself but it annoys and confuses people new to Grok/Zope. I'd therefore like to remove these registrations from zope.file, make it at least conditional, or move it to some `menu.zcml` or similar, not included automatically by z3c.autoinclude and friends. Is there a reason why that shouldn't happen? If not: what way would be the best in your opinion (removal/conditional/menu.zcml)? Best regards, -- Uli

2 1

zope-tests - FAILED: 1, OK: 40
by Zope tests summarizer 26 May '12

26 May '12

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-05-24 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-25 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit [1] Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063520.html

4 4

zope-tests - OK: 40, UNKNOWN: 1
by Zope tests summarizer 25 May '12

25 May '12

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-05-23 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-24 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux [1] FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063488.html

1 0

zope-tests - OK: 40, UNKNOWN: 1
by Zope tests summarizer 24 May '12

24 May '12

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-05-22 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-23 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux [1] FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063447.html

2 1

zope.i18n plural form support
by Thomas Massmann 23 May '12

23 May '12

Hi, I added the plural form support (see a corresponding ticket here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope.i18n/+bug/161985) in a separate branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~thomas-massmann/zope.i18n/plural. This code was mainly implemented during the 2012 Plonekonf in Munich. It is already in "production" since 3 months in a project I'm developing right now. Please note that zope.i18nmessageid needs to be taken from this branch to work: https://code.launchpad.net/~thomas-massmann/zope.i18nmessageid/plural. Extracting plural messages is supported by xgettext by default. Zope tools like i18nduder have to be adjusted (they don't support ungettext right now). I already adjusted lingua by Wichert Akkerman (https://github.com/tmassman/lingua) - the pull request is still open. Cheers, Thomas

4 7

zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1
by Zope tests summarizer 23 May '12

23 May '12

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-05-20 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-21 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux [1] FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [2] ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit [3] ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit [4] ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [5] winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32 [6] winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063362.html [2] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063350.html [3] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063352.html [4] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063351.html [5] FAILED winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063340.html [6] FAILED winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063339.html

3 4

zope-tests - FAILED: 2, OK: 41, UNKNOWN: 1
by Zope tests summarizer 23 May '12

23 May '12

This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-05-21 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-22 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux [1] FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [2] winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32 [3] winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063405.html [2] FAILED winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063383.html [3] FAILED winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063382.html

1 0

zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.
by Jim Fulton 22 May '12

22 May '12

The declaration-syntax warnings in the zope.interface 4.0.0 are annoying and mostly pointless. There will be enough pain in porting applications to Python 3, avoiding the surprise of having to use a different interface-declaration syntax will not be of any consequence. While the deprecation warning may provide some tiny benefit, the annoyance, especially for applications or libraries that still support Python 2.5 far outweights the benefit. I propose that these deprecation warnings be removed. Jim -- Jim Fulton http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton Jerky is better than bacon! http://www.dublinstore.com/

5 12